The Best Way to Learn the History of the United States
By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog
I have a regret to share.
No, not about my Argentine mistress.
My sorrow is, sadly, far more mundane. It is that I got into this history gig somewhat late in life, and though I have been at it for 15 years, my amateur? undocumented? fledgling? status will forever keep me from being chosen to write a volume of the Oxford History of the United States.
But that won't stop me from reading, and recommending, these marvelous books.
The Oxford formula is simple. Take a great historian. Give them a contract, an "era" in U.S. history, and about 700 or 800 pages with which to play. Two late greats—C. Vann Woodward and Richard Hofstadter—hatched the idea, 40-plus years ago. The first volume was published in 1982.
And so we have had James McPherson on the Civil War (Battle Cry of Freedom), and David M. Kennedy on the Great Depression and World War II (Freedom From Fear), and James T. Patterson on the postwar era (Grand Expectations).
I've just finished Robert Middlekauff's wonderful study (the 2005 edition, revised and expanded) of the American Revolution (The Glorious Cause), which, with no intention of slighting the skills and heroism of Abe Lincoln, persuaded me that George Washington was, and must forever be, the Greatest American.
Now on my bedside stack: Daniel Walker Howe's What Hath God Wrought, the story of how the post-Revolution generations of Americans advanced, or bungled, the holy causes of freedom and liberty they inherited from the Founding Fathers. I need to read it fast. Due out in the fall is Empire of Liberty—the story of the Federalist and Jeffersonian era by Gordon S. Wood.
The series has had its ups and downs. It has failed repeatedly at producing a book on the post-Civil War era, one of our most turbulent, fascinating, and overlooked times. Three of the authors—McPherson, Kennedy, and Howe—won Pulitzer prizes, but occasionally, the historians assigned to the task have faltered, grown ill or died, or ended up writing quite another book. And so with The Age of Federalism, published by Oxford, Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick dazzled readers and historians and won a Bancroft Prize, but were not officially made part of the series.
A few critics have complained that the whole idea of the series is middlebrow, and the analysis unoriginal. In one sense they are right. Any volume that has to deal with an era, in encyclopedic fashion, runs a risk of reading like a James Michener novel, plodding through the years with paper heroes. The great dramas of battle, or political intrigue, are inevitably boiled down to unsatisfactory capsules. It takes an author of great skill, like the late Arthur Schlesinger Jr. did in his own history of the New Deal, to capture the essence of a politician or businessman in three or four unforgettable paragraphs.
For foreign policy mavens, the Oxford editors have deviated from their formula, and issued From Colony to Superpower, by George Herring, a study spanning all of our history, on American foreign relations. I'm not sure how I feel about this. I like the original chronological approach. And when the editors asked Patterson to expand his take on postwar America to include the Nixon and Reagan and Clinton eras (Restless Giant), I think the Oxford folks made a mistake.
History needs distance. Even in Grand Expectations, his story of the 1950s and 1960s, you can see Patterson struggling a bit. I have to think there is just too much locked away in the presidential libraries and letters and diaries and unpublished memoirs and E-mails of recent years to allow us to properly and objectively analyze our own history—and there are far too many dominoes still falling to let us make judgments on the Clintons, or Reagan. Heck, the Nixon library just released more tapes the other day.
But these are quibbles. This series is jammed full of revealing statistics on social and economic trends, and great anecdotes about heroic, and average, Americans. And if you're the kind of reader, as I am, who likes to collect books for their reassuring heft—to be there when you just have to have a name or date immediately summonable—they look great upon the shelf.
Check out our political cartoons.
Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.
Tags: history
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (2) | Print
Reader Comments
Dear France ,enclosed is one slightly used Statue
Be one of the wretched teeming on a far shore yearning to breathe free.Then get a leaf blower & wade across EL RIO .P.S Don't forget your pregnant wife and 12 children!
HISTORY IS NOT EASY TO GET A HANDLE ON
From a practical standpoint history can not be taught in school. Textbook authors and teachers twist and distort facts, offer opinion as truth and base much of their opinion on hindsight seen through p.c. glasses.
Unfortunately there is no practical way to teach history in schools - a general biased, and sometimes factually flawed over view is the best we can hope for. The alternative - research, or at the least, the need to read several books dealing with each event or period - would be far too time consuming.
In my second year of college I was required to take "History of the United States - Civil War Through Current Times". Between the first and second class I read the entire text and and found more than 70 errors; wrong dates, opinion disguised as fact, conclusions wrongly drawn - all thoroughly seasoned with p.c. judgments and 20-20 hindsight.
I gave the professor a paper (referenced and footnoted) explaining the problems. A week later I was called to his office and told that it wouldn't be possible to hand out a correction sheet to the class - the mistakes and personal opinion were to be taught as fact (No, his name wasn't Ward Churchill).
I told him he should change the course title to a "Course in Historical Philosophy Based Upon Personal Opinion - As Seen Through Politically Correct Hindsight". I got an A, but was banished to the library for the remainder of the course.
Over the years more than one professor "Gulaged" me to the library - Just wish the internet existed then - lugging all those books around was hard work.
advertisement




