Saturday, November 28, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

Usernames Will Kill Facebook

June 12, 2009 03:40 PM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

Reader Comments

Oh look...

...another old dude, that doesn't understand that just becuase Google can see that your Facebook profile exists, doesn't mean that it can see everything on it.

Not understanding how to use privacy settings, and then publishing an article like this, makes you look like a top notch goon.

If one knows what one is doing on Facebook, one can have one's family and employers as friends, and still put those drunken crotch shots online without embarrassing oneself any more than one did when they were taken. It's not something I would recommend doing, but it is possible, if one doesn't ignore the privacy settings like the bumbling writer of this article did, one can be perfectly safe on Facebook from the clutches of the internet. In fact, most of your information is completely hidden by default, so if they aren't your "friend", the general public isn't going to see very much about you at all, even if they have your "username".

To Hattie in CA

You don't understand things like Facebook and Twitter because you're mature and know how to behave like such. There are actually people in their FORTIES who use these sites and have absolutely no clue how idiotic they look.

A Few Old Ladies

What a callous remark! Thanks to the insensitivity of public characters like yourself "old ladies" mean zero. In our extremely fragile economic situation the elderly are relegated to less importance than the family dog. Very likely those "old ladies" are too poor or overlooked by family or social services to hope for such a high-tech luxury as TV.

You and your loved ones are walking down the same path. As fortunes rise and fall, you may well end the same way unless you use your public position to raise societal awareness of the economic invitation to tragedy that beckons to all us travelers whether we feel as smug as yourself or not.

Author totall misses reality here...

1 These vanity id's simply make it easier for your friends and business assocuates to find you on Facebook. Profiles still remain private if a user so selects. Previously, a very long URL was the only ID available. LinkedIn provides a vanity URL already. So, this is not going to cause a sudden FB irrelevance.

2. The restriction of 1,000 is for pages, not profiles of regular users. So, all FB users have access to a vanity name.

3. Therefore, this predicted demise is very misguided. FB wild popularity will continue and only be enhanced.

FACEBOOK AND TWITTER ETC

I AM A VERY OLD LADY. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY THESE THINGS ARE SO WONDERFUL. PLEASE EXPLAIN.

'USER NAMES WILL KILL FACE BOOK'

R.I.P.

What an Amazingly Uninformed Assertion

Lame article.

That is all.

Facebook requiring minimum of 1000 fans

This evening while closely reading the Facebook FAQ regarding the ability to create a username that is appended to the Facebook URL, I also noticed the 1000 fan requirement. If you look closely they will eliminate this requirement by the end of this month. I believe this is to give the major brand holders a chance to claim their rightful names to minimize name squatters.

I ran into a problem as I maintain a site called http://www.ereader-pricesandreviews.com that I wanted to add as my user name but Facebook requires your new username to be closely associated to your current real name that you used to sign up with Facebook initially. Since in my case I only have a personal Facebook account, I cannot use my website name for the new username. If someone has a real name such as John Flowers or Joseph Pizza, Flowers or Pizza in the username would be equivalent to winning the lottery as that could be valuable for advertising purposes when found in a Google search result! They have also closed the registration of new Facebook accounts for a period of time, I think a few weeks also to prevent a "land grab" of multiple accounts and usernames. In the case of business Facebook accounts, they are allowing trademarked and proprietary words to be protected by the owners. They also have an infringement form that a user can submit to protect their rights on a trademarked or proprietary name.

Ok??

Keep in mind that people's profiles will still be privacy protected, all the settings each user sets will remain the same. There's also the option of removing your profile from public searches on sites other than Facebook, in the privacy settings page under "public search listing". I don't understand why people don't get this.

Dumb dumb article

This reminds me of the idiotic notion that being popular killed musical talent in the 90's.

Add your thoughts

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.
U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Thank You, Bob Dylan

He’s still touring around America like a rolling stone.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.