Monday, November 9, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

Clarence Darrow and the Justice of Obama's Empathy Test

June 01, 2009 03:00 PM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

It's perhaps not surprising that President Obama, a community advocate, liberal hero, and lawyer from Chicago, should list "empathy" as an essential quality for a Supreme Court justice. The president's Hyde Park neighborhood is soaked in the spirit of America's greatest defense attorney, Clarence Darrow—a man whose character was defined by empathy.

Were he alive today, Darrow would endorse Obama's call for justices who empathize with their fellow human beings. And he would vehemently contest the conservative argument that, as columnist Charles Krauthammer puts it, empathy "stops at the courthouse door."

Darrow's great motivating force was "a strong emotional nature which has caused me boundless joy and infinite pain," he once confessed. "I had a vivid imagination. Not only could I put myself in the other person's place, but I could not avoid doing so."

Mary Field Parton, a onetime lover and longtime friend, recalled a visit to a newly opened prison with Darrow. She was startled when he started to weep. The stone and iron had been put in place by the same working class it was destined to imprison, he told her. "They build the jails to lock themselves up in."

Said Parton: "He always understood. No matter how bad, how wicked a person was... He just understood out of the greatness of his heart, and his knowledge of human nature and the temptations and the frustrations that made people act as they did."

Darrow was a determinist. He had an unshaken belief that men and women became who they were because of their genetic makeup, early childhood experiences, and social environment. "In my vocabulary," he wrote, "there is no such word as 'guilt' and no such thing as moral wrong."

He scorned the concept of "free will." He had nothing but contempt for judges who imposed conformity, or tried to regulate social behavior in the name of abstract principles. He recognized that the law, as often as not, was a construct designed to secure the rich and powerful. Society was "organized injustice," Darrow said. He would frown and groan, today, at the suggestion that justices be "strict constructionists."

"What society and commerce mean to teach is that the strong and cunning may and should overreach the weak," Darrow wrote, "but they must only take their victims' money in certain standardized ways."

"It is sheer nonsense," he said, "to think that the laws have much to do with conduct or virtue, or that they are made to be generally enforced, or that they are always right or just, or that they are ever equal."

In his famous trials, debates, and public speaking, and the often-delightful fiction he wrote, Darrow helped mold the modern liberal view of crime as a symptom, and of criminals as the creations of their environment. We are all shipwrecked sailors, clinging to a life raft, tossed by great forces we cannot control. The best we can do, he said, is to try to ease each other's suffering.

Darrow was born in a small town in Ohio, where his father was the village infidel—a Democrat and free-thinker in a community of churchgoing Republicans. Their home was filled with books, and he was raised on skeptics like Paine and Jefferson and Voltaire. He arrived in Chicago when he was 30, and almost immediately took to arguing for underdogs—the Haymarket bombing defendants, assassin Patrick Prendergast, and the great socialist labor leader Eugene Debs.

Darrow and his wife Ruby lived in a relatively modest but roomy Hyde Park apartment overlooking the University of Chicago, not far from Obama's home. He loved the view from his windows of Lake Michigan and Jackson Park, where he had played a small role, as a young municipal attorney, in the city's staging of the Columbian Exposition, the world's fair of 1893. After his death, Darrow's ashes were scattered in the park's lagoon.

Darrow had strong ties to the university where Obama would, years later, teach constitutional law, and where promising students still vie to be Clarence Darrow Scholars. He lectured at the university, and some of the school's instructors were regular attendees at Darrow's "Biology Club," an informal gathering he hosted to stay well-versed in the latest scientific and academic theory. (He also preserved the liberty of one professor who was prosecuted for adultery after being caught with an Army officer's wife during World War I.) Darrow's funeral was held, in 1938, in the university chapel.

Like others of Chicago's famous sons, Darrow fails to qualify for sainthood. His noblest victories—the Scopes Monkey Trial, Ossian Sweet, and Loeb & Leopold cases—came when he was almost 70 years old; much more of his professional life was spent in the bruising worlds of ward politics and violent labor disputes. He was at heart a 19th-century American—an unrelenting foe of the Robber Barons, but as prone as any man to what his friend, the novelist Brand Whitlock, called "the awful compulsion of the age, to make money." Darrow was a cheerful cynic who infuriated his liberal friends by joining and abandoning various causes, took women where he found them, and, like other lawyers of his era, was not beyond suborning witnesses and jurors.

Darrow gave himself little credit. He was as much an instrument of the great forces that made him as the criminals he defended or the judges he defied, he said.

"My sympathies always went out to the weak, the suffering and the poor. Realizing their sorrows, I tried to relieve them in order that I myself might be relieved," he wrote. "I know why I have taken this course—I could not help it. I could have had no comfort or peace of mind if I had acted any other way."

With Darrow's talents, another man or woman could have acquired great wealth and power—maybe even a Supreme Court seat. But, in the end, his famous cynicism was not Clarence Darrow's defining quality. Empathy was.

"Often my clients did not do the things with which they were charged," he said. "Sometimes they did do them, and then I tried to make courts and juries understand the reasons why."

Check out our political cartoons.

Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.

Tags: Supreme Court | Supreme Court justices | Barack Obama

Tools: Share | | Comments (4) | Print

Reader Comments

To Muser

Well stated, but I believe you reenforce my point. The weighing of unemotional and impartial facts and a logical reading of the Constitution would have eliminated slavery. You assume "empathy" would eliminate slavery; I believe empathy for the slave states maintained it. Bigotry is an emotion too.

Brad (below)

I'm inclined to question the scale as a symbol of justice at the Supreme Court level. You can put some stuff on either side of any scale and it will tip one way or another. But someone has to decide what's fair to be putting on either side in the first place and then announce with honesty which way the thing tilted.

There was NEVER anything to be "weighed" that would have justified the existence of slavery for even a single year after the constitution was ratified---and yet Lincoln found himself talking about "four score (plus)" years in which the Supreme Court had not found a way to strike it down.

We needed a bunch of Darrow types and did not get them---that's all. Now we have a chance to get one. I hope Sotomayor is really so inclined.

Thank Goodness Clarence Isn't Available

As a defender of the weak and down-trodden, Clarence Darrow was a wonderful person and a fine American; but he would have made a terrible Supreme Court Justice. Empathy may sound like a fine trait for a judge, but one man's empathy is another's tyranny - which is why justice is symbolized by a scale - unemotional and impartial. In any case this is a moot point, as a white male Darrow wouldn't satisfy Obama's primary criteria.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Voters' Top Priority: The Economy

Obama Democrats should stop rushing healthcare reform and address more important issues.

H1N1 Vaccine for Wall Street?

Another example of what's wrong with government run healthcare.

Healthcare Vote Delays a Bad Sign for Dems

Expect more waiting, and arm twisting, as vulnerable reps take the hint from voters.

Americans Want Jobs, Not Healthcare Reform

As the unemployment rate reaches double digits, the public makes its preference known.

California Candidates' Poor Voting Record

Couldn't Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have put a note in their BlackBerrys about voting?

Pelosi Cracks the Whip on Moderates

She's using fear of payback to push middle-of-the-road Democrats to vote for the House bill.

A Dollar a Day to Keep the Babies Away

North Carolina program aiding at-risk kids needs to go nationwide.

The New V Takes Swipes at Both Sides

Are they sniping at Obama? Sure? Bush too.

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.