Why Newspapers Are Dying: Nobody Cares About Mona Sutphen but the Washington Post
By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog
Mona Sutphen.
Who is she?
The deputy White House chief of staff for policy.
Zzzzzzz.
Wake up! She got a huge write-up in the Style section of the Washington Post today. Color photo. Half the front page.
Wow! What have I missed? In what scandal is she enmeshed?
None. The reporter interviewed her friends, White House colleagues and mentors, and they all say she is a person of excellent character.
Ah. So surely the evil Republicans have made her a matter of controversy for her liberal beliefs?
Cannot really say. As far as we can tell, no Republicans or critics of the administration were interviewed for the story. Certainly none were quoted.
Well surely there is some outrageous anecdote on which to peg a profile. Did she fight in the Israeli army? Lose a finger in her youth? Does she curse like a sailor?
Well, there is one anecdote. The profile opens with a story about how the governor of Kansas once met Sutphen in the hallway and recognized her name.
Well why does the Post say we should care about her?
The story says that "as a respected foreign policy thinker in a job coordinating President Obama's vast domestic policy agenda, she embodies the way this administration blurs the line between the two, believing that issues such as public education, regulatory reform and economic recovery no longer stop at the water's edge."
Blecch. OK , why did the Post really give her so much space?
Getting her to return the newspaper's phone calls and leak stories may have something to do with it. Otherwise, why print the single most boring story ever to appear in an American newspaper, anywhere, ever?
And you wonder why newspapers are losing readers?
Not really.
On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.
- Read more by John Aloysius Farrell.
- Read more from the Thomas Jefferson Street blog.
- Read more about the media.
Tags: journalism | media | Washington Post
Tools: 
Share
|
| Comments (4) | Print
Reader Comments
Thank you, I just wanted to give a greeting and tell you I like your website very much.
The stuff on this web site is really witty adn cool wise
I am find your source via http://google.com
Ummm
Hey, were you at the front of the line when they were giving out frontal lobotomies?
I'd never heard of her but she speaks to a demographic other than your own, and maybe not everyone in the world sees the world through your eyes and in your shoes.
No doubt your comment was tongue in cheek (although maybe not huh), but reporting that you dont agree with the piece or its placement isnt a reason newspapers are losing readers, its rather because people like you make ridiculous statements which appear like someone removed your brain, or at least its thinking faculties
I guess i did laugh at you tho, so you did do something for me but cheap laughs are so scarping the barrel of journalism.
cheers
Post...Oh I can top that
Jack, that's nuttin, though I do like reading about the new team, controversial or not. Today the Post ran a Loudoun Extra story about a two-income family making six figures boo-hooing about a slight pay cut by one of the wage earners. Daddy, a car painter, took a 10 percent hit, maybe $6,000, and they make it sound like they are homeless. Examples: She can't get her fingernails AND toes done. He has to eat frozen shrimp. Here's that story:
http://loudounextra.washingtonpost.com/news/2009/apr/15/pay-cuts-sharpen-familys-focus/?local
advertisement
