Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

What Wasn't Said at the Barack Obama Press Conference

December 01, 2008 03:06 PM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

It's in the job description. As Russell Baker once said, a significant part of the life of a Washington reporter is sitting around outside a closed door, waiting for someone to come out and lie to you.

So when the capital's press corps gets the chance to call a politician on even the flimsiest of fibs, its members tend to cherish the moment.

And that was why President-elect Obama got repeated opportunities at today's press conference to admit that he's had a history with Hillary Rodham Clinton that—Maybe? Just might? Perhaps?—lead to rocky days ahead.

Had not she said all those nasty things about his un-reliability and lack of experience in a crisis during the campaign? Didn't he and his aides reply in kind, alleging that her foreign policy duties as first lady had been limited to funerals and teas?

The gotcha theme went on for too long, but the questions were good-naturedly posed, as was Obama's reply that, sure, in the heat of a campaign a politician can get a bit...excessive...when criticizing a foe.

And Obama sure wasn't making any other news when declining—properly—to say too much about the weekend's awful events in India.

I suppose we endure these somewhat pointless exercises because in every reporter's heart there a hope that once, just once, a politician will answer like this:

"Okay. You got me. You have cleverly recalled, and courageously reminded me, that on repeated occasions during the campaign I knowingly and unfairly characterized my opponent as a slimy worthless pretender to high office, thus revealing my own all-consu ming ambition, shameless disregard for truth and contempt for the voters.

"I can only hope that, by making a clean breast of things under your piercing and steely-eyed interrogation, I can somehow redeem myself. And that you the mighty defenders of America 's right to know will judge me mercifully, and accept my humble groveling as a sign of my contrition."

Yeah, right. That will happen soon.

Tags: media | Barack Obama | Hillary Clinton

Tools: Share | | Comments (6) | Print

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.