Monday, November 9, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

The Facts About Barack Obama's and John McCain's Tax Plans—No Socialism Here

October 29, 2008 10:57 AM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

I've caught a little grief from folks who aren't pleased with the way I explained the differences between the McCain and Obama tax plans yesterday.

Some of it is ideological, from partisans wearing their Limbaugh-Hannity blinders, who simply refuse to recognize that, under Obama's plan, the mythical Joe the Plumber, married with two kids, and earning $200,000 a year WOULD GET A $6,474 TAX CUT!

Which just happens to be the identical tax cut that McCain is offering to that same upper-middle-class family.

Now, where I come from, families earning $200,000 a year are still making a lot of money. They may be annoyed at the country club assessment, or stretched by the cost of prep school tuition, or upset with the price of gasoline and auto insurance for the cars they have given their teenage children, but they are far from hurting. Yet Obama still wants to cut their taxes—significantly.

That, my friends, is not socialism.

Other critics, more reasonably, have asked why I used broad tax categories—the middle 20 percent, the richest 1 percent—in yesterday's post, since most folks don't know where they fit, percentagewise, in the universe of taxpayers.

Fair enough.

Here, from the same Tax Policy Center analysis that both sides in the argument are relying on, is how your average working family—two earners, with two children—would make out under the McCain and Obama plans.

(Note: The Tax Policy Center also has charts for seniors, single-earner families, and single taxpayers at its website.)

The big differences are at the top and the bottom of the charts. As noted above, both candidates treat the upper middle class the same.

But if you are Fred the unemployed construction worker, and Denise the house cleaner, with a combined income of $25,000 a year, McCain will give you nothing, while Obama cuts your (refundable) taxes by $1,287 per year.

If you are Hal the high school football coach, and Sally the bank teller, earning $100,000 a year, McCain gives you a $2,759 tax break, but Obama still gives you more—$3,043.

We've noted what Joe will get at $200,000 a year.

The biggest difference—and the real reason McCain is gibbering about "socialism" on the campaign trail—is in the upper brackets.

If you are Mike and Beth the Doctors, blessed, smart, and gifted enough to bring home $500,000 a year, McCain will leave your taxes as they are, and Obama will raise them by $6,727. That's almost real money, even for millionaires.

But is it enough, as you look around and see what has happened to your country, to make you vote Republican again? You, more than most, understand the challenges faced by your working-class patients. Consider: Obama merely repeals the Bush tax cuts, leaving you at what you were paying during the Clinton years.

Then, finally, we arrive at Boardwalk and Park Place, the real Spread the Wealth territory in Obama's plan.

Hello, Jeff the Titan of Wall Street, and Monica the corporate lawyer. (And Sean and Rush the blowhards.) You're making $2 million a year, with a house on the Vineyard and the kids on a glide path to Yale and Sweetbriar. And McCain will actually cut your taxes.

It's chump change for you—just $1,122. Why, you've spent more than that in a restaurant. But beware the evil socialist Obama. He wants you to kick in another $108,704 a year, from your cool $2 million, to finance the tax cuts he is planning to give to Fred and Denise, Hal and Sally...and even ol' Joe the Plumber.

Them, folks, is the facts.

  • Click here to read more by John Aloysius Farrell.
  • Click here to read more about taxes.
  • Click here to read more about John McCain.
  • Click here to read more about Barack Obama.
  • Click here to read more about Campaign 2008.

Tags: presidential election 2008 | taxes | Barack Obama | John McCain

Tools: Share | | Comments (164) | Print

Reader Comments

sssss

i hate writing

Proof of Socialism

"But beware the evil socialist Obama. He wants you to kick in another $108,704 a year, from your cool $2 million, to finance the tax cuts he is planning to give to Fred and Denise, Hal and Sally...and even ol' Joe the Plumber."

Exactly! Nailed it, Farrell. Letting the government take what someone has earned and then figuring out how they want to REDISTRIBUTE IT to the ones making $25000 or less. Good job. You just helped out the McCain fans even more. I, for one, am against Socialism. Call me greedy for being a Capitalist, but I'd rather work my way up than the government pandering to me (who makes less than $25000) and saying they'll give me money. What initiative do I have then to work? The government will constantly give me tax cuts and money for being poor. Gee, that makes loads of sense! Good job on the *epic fail.*

Long live socialism! Thanks to America for choosing someone who will kill our infrastructure... Proud to be an American now!

obama

dear,Obama u mka us pa a lo of taxes lik $20.00

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Voters' Top Priority: The Economy

Obama Democrats should stop rushing healthcare reform and address more important issues.

H1N1 Vaccine for Wall Street?

Another example of what's wrong with government run healthcare.

Healthcare Vote Delays a Bad Sign for Dems

Expect more waiting, and arm twisting, as vulnerable reps take the hint from voters.

Americans Want Jobs, Not Healthcare Reform

As the unemployment rate reaches double digits, the public makes its preference known.

California Candidates' Poor Voting Record

Couldn't Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have put a note in their BlackBerrys about voting?

Pelosi Cracks the Whip on Moderates

She's using fear of payback to push middle-of-the-road Democrats to vote for the House bill.

A Dollar a Day to Keep the Babies Away

North Carolina program aiding at-risk kids needs to go nationwide.

The New V Takes Swipes at Both Sides

Are they sniping at Obama? Sure? Bush too.

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.