Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

Obama Looks Presidential While McCain Looks for a Photo Op

September 26, 2008 12:17 PM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

Barack Obama was at the White House yesterday, looking presidential.

Maybe you remember "presidential." You know: smart, calm, patriotic.

Obama knew, going in, that it was a Republican setup. And that George W was just trying to help his sidekick, John McCain, to a third Bush term.

But when your country is in a fix and the president asks for your help, if you're a patriot you show up. You make the best of an awkward political situation. You do your homework. You ask relevant questions. You participate.

As opposed to, say, McCain.

Given the Republican nominee's untethered (there's that word again) performance in the last three weeks, during which he has swung wildly from Oblivious to Panicky by way of Blurt and Bluster, McCain's performance comes as no surprise.

But it is still instructive to review McCain's actions in the last two days, to see why the notion of him as president is now alarming even some Republicans.

After making the hasty announcement Wednesday that he was suspending his presidential campaign to rush to Washington and lead the bickering sides to a bipartisan agreement, McCain did no such thing. Instead, he spent Wednesday night and much of Thursday in New York, trying, self-servingly, to get on television.

If the Democrats are competent, David Letterman's taunt—Hey , John, do you need a ride to the airport?will echo through the next 40 days.

McCain finally arrived in the capital yesterday afternoon. Almost immediately, he discovered that the bailout deal (the one that he hoped to swoop in and seize credit for) was falling apart because of Republican opposition.

Did McCain roll up his sleeves and put his magical maverick bipartisan skills to work? Did he help get the members of his own party on board? Build a bridge or two across the aisle? Stick it to the Wall Street greedheads, as he had promised, by capping the money they can make in this bailout?

No. McCain closeted himself with his advisers and tried to find a way to salvage his rapidly deteriorating political position.

Then it was time for the White House photo op, which McCain had so coveted. And what does Mr. Suspend My Campaign for the Good of the Country do?

He goes AWOL.

"At the bipartisan White House meeting that Mr. McCain had called for a day earlier, he sat silently for more than 40 minutes, more observer than leader, and then offered only a vague sense of where he stood," the New York Times reported.

"Mr. McCain, whose support of the deal is critical if fellow Republicans are to sign on, declined to take a stand," another Times story noted.

"McCain declined to commit," said the Washington Post. "For much of yesterday, McCain shuttled between meetings and his Senate office but rarely came close to the Capitol suites and committee rooms where the talks were taking place."

Ultimately, McCain's pal, Sen. Lindsey Graham, admitted to reporters that McCain "knew little about the plan the nominee had come to Washington to try to shape."

At this point, Obama has two options. Both are pretty good. And not mutually exclusive.

He can leave Washington, blasting Bush and McCain for incompetence and insincerity, and promise the voters to clean house—big time—in January.

Or—and this is a long shot, probably requiring a really scary collapse of the markets that would force Republicans back to the table—Obama might do what McCain did not.

He can show he's worthy of the title "Mr. President."

He can step in, step up, and lead.

Tags: debates | presidential election 2008 | Barack Obama | John McCain

Tools: Share | | Comments (39) | Print

Reader Comments

MCCAIN/OBAMA

Ok, we all know that McCain was a POW and did his job as a soldier and everybody gives him that (by the way, my grandson is also in the marines) but does not qualify him to be president. His beliefs are very Bush-like whether he admits it or not. He wanted to get the women vote by chosing Palin as his running-mate, but we all know what a mistake that is. He keeps saying his a maverick. What exactly does that mean? I guess that means that he votes with Bush 90 per cent of the time. I guess that means that he can keep telling us lies (that have been proven to be lies) in every speech and keep pointing the finger for everything on Obama. He tried to take credit for the bailout before learning that it failed and then had to come back and explain his statement, again blaming Obama. Be carefull who you vote for especially when he keeps calling you "my friend."

MCCAIN/OBAMA

Ok, we all know that McCain was a POW and did his job as a soldier and everybody gives him that (by the way, my grandson is also in the marines) but does not qualify him to be president. His beliefs are very Bush-like whether he admits it or not. He wanted to get the women vote by chosing Palin as his running-mate, but we all know what a mistake that is. He keeps saying his a maverick. What exactly does that mean? I guess that means that he votes with Bush 90 per cent of the time. I guess that means that he can keep telling us lies (that have been proven to be lies) in every speech and keep pointing the finger for everything on Obama. He tried to take credit for the bailout before learning that it failed and then had to come back and explain his statement, again blaming Obama. Be carefull who you vote for especially when he keeps calling you "my friend."

Once Again

Just like the war strategy, the republicans have adopted Obama's plan, started to act on it, and will claim it for their own. Look at the E mail, written by Sen. Obama, that the Obama campaign sent out after the White House announced the bailout plan. Then look at the provisions that were added to the plan by the congress. Bush will do anything, and so will his partner McCain to get elected. The country is certainly not first here. Do you trust the old guard in the Congress to spend $700 Billion right now? Kennedy, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Stevens, Young, McCain, Byrd, and on and on, must be the folks you like. You keep sending them back.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Bush Airport Reflects Its Namesake

Could Houston's Bush Intercontinental airport be number one because of its name?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.