Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

Voters Still Trying to Get to Know Obama

September 12, 2008 04:34 PM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

Ace Democratic pollster Peter Hart says his latest state-of-the-campaign report is "not meant to be a pick-me-up for Obama supporters" and candidly reflects the fact that "the trend over the past three months has been good for the Republicans."

But if you read past the top lines of the recent public opinion surveys, Hart says, you'll find that Barack Obama has quietly been doing what he has to get done if he hopes to clinch the White House in November.

"The assumption in every survey is that if one side is doing well, the other side must be doing poorly. The truth is far from that, and one could easily make that case that the Obama campaign accomplished a great deal over the past month and has strategically put itself into a position to win this election," he says.

The horse race may still be neck and neck, but Obama is looking more and more presidential. If the election is going to turn on whether Americans believe that Obama has the right stuff for the Oval Office, as many political wise guys have been predicting, then he is quietly making the necessary progress.

"Once again, the Democrats seem to have done what they are famous for—start the summer with a lead, and begin the fall having squandered that lead," Hart acknowledges. Hart is the Democratic wizard for the bipartisan NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, which many in the business look to as the gold standard. The poll gave Obama a 6 point lead in June but just a 1 point lead in September.

"What Sarah Palin's candidacy has done is help the Republicans shift this election back to the one area where they are the most comfortable—the cultural wars," says Hart. The Democratic advantage in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Missouri, and Virginia has eroded. He "half-jokingly" wonders if "Palin's coattails can carry McCain into the Oval Office."

But to the Democrats, Hart offers this bit of encouragement. The hoopla about Palin has made this election much less about whether Obama has the experience to handle the job, thus changing "one of the key dynamics that was working for McCain."

"The closer the race, the more voters will be looking at the relative choice of McCain compared with Obama—this is a much better situation for the Democrats than a simple referendum on Obama," says Hart.

Positive feelings for Obama are at an all-time high. His supporters are excited about supporting him. He and McCain are running neck and neck when pollsters ask whether the voters would feel comfortable with them as president or are comfortable with their backgrounds and values.

Obama trounces McCain on the question of which candidate would improve America's standing in the world. And people are getting to like him.

When voters are asked who they would rather have over for dinner, they choose Obama (40 percent) over Palin (33) and Biden, with McCain running last at 15 percent.

"For two years, voters have been trying to take the measure of Barack Obama," Hart concludes. "They concede that he is a special and gifted person, and he has inspired many Americans as only a handful of leaders over the past half-century have done.

"For all this, the question remains, `Is he safe?' It is a simple yet all-encompassing question about his experience, his race, his leadership style, and his inner core," Hart says. In two weeks, the voters will begin to answer that question, as they watch Obama and McCain square off in the presidential debates.

For the next 53 days, "my best advice is to buckle up—it is going to be a bumpy ride," Hart says.

Tags: presidential election 2008 | voters | Barack Obama | polls

Tools: Share | | Comments (30) | Print

Reader Comments

Palin is "less phony"??!???!

Really? Based on what? Did you even know her name more than 2 weeks ago? What do we actually know about her record or her style of governing? Why is she "less phony"? Is she not a politician? Or does she just seem like less of one because you just don't know her very well?

What we do know about Palin is that she is under investigation for ethics violations and abuse of power while claiming that she's a "reformer." She REPEATEDLY misrepresents her own record on the campaign trail-- even after being called out for it and admitting it. That "bridge to nowhere" was dead long before she claimed to have "killed" it. She also filled way too many positions of power in her administration with her buddies-- her department of agriculture was led by a former real estate agent who happened to go to high school with Palin. Background in anything remotely related to agriculture not required.

People need a much healthier dose of skepticism with it comes to sizing up Palin-- right now she's the person you've had a few really great dates with. But would you marry someone after a few weeks of dating? Better yet, would you put that person in charge of the country?

Imbecile above

Too many comments on too many blogs merely show the person who submitted it is a complete idiot and imbecile. The one making innacurate slurs about everyone except Palin is one that has lost to base emotions and lost all coherent thought. Please don't waste your time writing such blather and showing other readers that you are a worthless piece of crap above the neck. After reading too many similar comments for several months, I am simply fed up with them. You deserve the moronic leadership you elect, and I fear that a majority of Americans are as congenitally stupid as the commentator above. I urge everyone with a function cerebral cortex to use it and go out to vote in November. Don't let the idiots rule our country for the next 4 years. Best wishes from Arizona.

Still don't know Obama

How come every little detail of Palin's life is attacked? How come the sinister and corrupt associates of Obama are not looked into? Why don't we know about the period of time when Obama first went to Chicago and crossed paths over and over with Ayers, Khalidi, Daly, etc. Too many instances of collusion and none of it is discussed or investigated. Why is Obama so aloof and dispassionate regarding terrorism? Who are these people who gave Obama his start in Chicago and influenced him greatly? He fluffs all questioning off and the media backs down. Why? Until I see Obama properly vetted I will not vote my party!

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Can Conservative Carly Fiorina Carry Cali?

Ronald Reagan's state is now one of the most liberal in the nation.

Opinions Clash on Wars in Iran, Afghanistan

Fewer favor the effort in Afghanistan, support rises for hostilities against Iran's nuclear program.

Bennet's Senate Seat Is Already at Risk

His vote on healthcare would be less a case of political martyrdom than it may seem.

Bush Airport Reflects Its Namesake

Could Houston's Bush Intercontinental airport be number one because of its name?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.