Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

John Aloysius Farrell

Palin-drama: Is Teen Marriage Best for the Coming Child?

September 02, 2008 01:46 PM ET | John Aloysius Farrell | Permanent Link | Print

Say what you will about Sarah and Bristol and Twig. I'm feeling sorry for Levi.

There are no scarier words for a 17-year-old boy than "I'm late."

Except perhaps, "I'm late, and my mother is governor of Alaska and commander of the National Guard and running for vice president and thinks we should get married."

Or, "I'm late, and my mother knows her way around a shotgun."

Or, "I'm late, and you may want to talk to my ex-uncle, the state trooper, about how the Palin clan handles family disputes."

I hope that Levi and Bristol are deeply in love and spiritual soul mates, and that their high school romance will endure for 60 or 70 years. I hope that there's a sweet Knocked Up ending to their tale.

But let's be real. Life ain't Hollywood. The odds are not good.

Has anyone in St. Paul even raised the suggestion that it is not in the best interest of Levi and Bristol, at 17, to be forced into marriage with the whole world watching?

Or that their son or daughter might have a better life if raised by adoptive parents, or by a single mom in the vice-presidential mansion in Washington?

Or is that the sticking point? I guess you can't go barnstorming the country on Air Force Two, railing against sex ed and promoting abstinence, with an unwed teenage mother at home.

Certainly John McCain—the self-professed conqueror of Brazilian fashion models and Florida strippers in his lusty days of youth—should know better.

Hey, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton were raised by single moms, and look how they turned out. (All right, all right. I acknowledge room for debate about Bill.)

Perhaps this is a positive development. Perhaps this happening, in the best of families, will make Americans pause. Perhaps we'll be more understanding, and less willing to condemn, when we hear the next story of a Bristol and Levi, a Tasha and Alice, or an Adam and Steve, succumbing to the demands of their genetic imperatives.

But somehow I doubt it. I hear the ghosts of our Puritan forebears, deep in their tombs, cackling with malicious delight.

Tags: abortion | presidential election 2008 | marriage | teens | Sarah Palin

Tools: Share | | Comments (48) | Print

Reader Comments

Palinoma

First of all, I was a McCain Supporter ... until he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate. My reservations about Sarah Palin have nothing to do with the fact that she has young kids. I admire the fact that she is doing her bit to go forth and multiply .. and populate Alaska :-). My real problem with Sarah Palin is that she is a hypocrite. On the one hand, she appeals to Christian conservatives with her "family values" pitch but on the other.. she seems to be running a marathon to break most of the 10 commandments over and over and over again. She has admitted to smoking dope, she had her first child 8 months after she got married - you do the math, she has used the powers of her political office to settle personal scores with members of her extended family, she is using state funds to pay someone who is essentially her family lawyer to represent her in court, she wants to defile Alaskan wilderness with by allowing her friends in the oil lobby to drill oil wells there (showing her total lack of regard for God's will for us to protect and preserve tha habitat that He has blessed us with), and she lies through her teeth when it comes to throwing unfounded accusations against her opponents - republicans and democrats alike. Some of my friends from church think that she sets a very bad role model for young women - by engaging in premarital sex herself and celebrating her young daughter's choice to do the same; and by choosing to bring a child with Down Syndrome into this world by choosing to have unprotected sex while in in her 40's when she ought to know better!

Palinoma

First of all, I was a McCain Supporter ... until he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate. My reservations about Sarah Palin have nothing to do with the fact that she has young kids. I admire the fact that she is doing her bit to "go forth and multiply" and populate Alaska :-). My real problem with Sarah Palin is that she is a hypocrite. On the one hand, she appeals to Christian conservatives with her "family values" pitch but on the other.. she seems to be running a marathon to break most of the 10 commandments over and over and over again. She has admitted to smoking dope, she had her first child 8 months after she got married - you do the math, she has used the powers of her political office to settle personal scores with members of her extended family, she is using state funds to pay someone who is essentially her family lawyer to represent her in court, she wants to defile Alaskan wilderness with by allowing her friends in the oil lobby to drill oil wells there (showing her total lack of regard for God's will for us to protect and preserve tha habitat that He has blessed us with), and she lies through her teeth when it comes to throwing unfounded accusations against her opponents - republicans and democrats alike. Some of my friends from church think she sets a very bad role model for young women - by having engaged in premarital sex herself (which is not something my pastor would approve of) and celebrating her young daughter's choice to do the same; and by choosing to bring a child with Down Syndrome into this world by choosing to have unprotected sex while in in her 40's when she ought to know better!

Bristol

I would say that Bristol was raised by 2 people with good values so why wouldn't she choose life for her child? I don't think she was forced to marry her boyfriend or keep her child.When you have a strong pro-life background you wouldn't even think of an abortion.Do you realize that almost 500,000,000 abortions have been performed since Roe vs Wade decision? That's a whole generation. It's not everyones"s answer.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.