Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Opinion

Jodie Allen

Behind the Shifting Poll Numbers on Abortion

October 06, 2009 10:44 AM ET | Jodie Allen | Permanent Link | Print

By Jodie Allen, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Experienced pollsters often find the trend in responses over time as interesting—or even more interesting—than the absolute numbers recorded. This is especially the case when dealing with controversial or novel topics, the sort of question that may tend to make respondents more likely to give what they see as the socially or morally acceptable answer rather than what they truly think.

So it caught the attention of the experts at the Pew Research Center when they noticed in an April 2009 poll that the proportion of American adults saying they thought that abortion should be legal in all or most cases had declined by 8 percentage points from the level recorded as recently as August 2008. Whereas in the 2008 poll those favoring legal abortion outnumbered those in opposition by 54 percent to 41 percent, now the two sides were essentially tied at 46 percent to 44 percent.

Wondering if the latest finding was simply a one-time anomaly—even in the best designed and administered polls these do crop up from time to time—or a real change in public attitudes, they decided to follow up the question in two August national surveys to see both if the results were stable and also whether demographic patterns in the responses suggested a possible explanation for sudden shift.

The August surveys were conducted in two waves, (Aug. 11-17 and 20-27) yielding a nationwide sample of 4,013 adults, 18 years of age or older. Adding in the April sample produced a rich lode of 5,500 respondents, ample enough to slice and dice in multiple ways. For purposes of comparison, surveys from 2007 and 2008 were combined to yield a total sample of more than 14,000. Moreover, as the Pew Research Center's Director of Survey Research Scott Keeter notes, in designing the August surveys they were extra careful not to place the abortion questions behind other questions that might influence responses, so as to "get the cleanest reading possible."

The overall findings from the total sample closely matched the April results with the proportion choosing "legal in most or all cases" at 47 percent, a 7-percentage-point drop from a year earlier, while the number saying abortion should be illegal in all or most cases rose by four points to 45 percent—producing a virtual tie between the two sides.

The report of the findings, released on October 1, drew widespread attention in not just the press, but also some criticism from other pollsters. For example, Gary Langer, director of polling at ABC News, expressed skepticism noting that other polls, including ABC's and a summer Washington Post poll, did not show a trend away from support for legal abortion. "Our June 21 result almost exactly matched our long-term average in polls since 1995, 56-42 percent," Langer wrote, adding: "It is notable that Pew's gotten mid-40s twice this year. Nonetheless, I'd sure like more consistency across polls to call it a trend—especially given other recent data." For example, he pointed to another ABC June finding that fully 60 percent said they'd wanted then-nominee Sonia Sotomayor to vote to uphold Roe v. Wade, were she to be confirmed as a Supreme Court justice.

Still, Langer acknowledged, his polls this year had showed some shifting—both rightward and leftward—on social issues so, "We may be in a period of some changeability as people reassess these positions with the Democrats in power, one of the suggestions Pew's making."

And, indeed, the Pew Research report concluded that both the timing of the shift—coming after the election of Democrat Barack Obama as president—and its distribution among demographic and political groups "suggests that the election of a pro-choice Democrat as president may be a contributing factor."

The findings are bolstered, Keeter observes, not only by the very large size of the samples from which the trend is derived but also by the fact that the observed "pattern of change made some sense—that it didn't seem to be random noise." For example, it is telling that no fall off in support for legal abortion was seen among Obama's most supportive groups: African Americans, young people and those unaffiliated with a religion. At the same time, declines were most pronounced among Republican-leaning independents (a group that now included many former Republicans) and church-going Catholics but also among Democratic men—though not Democratic women, says Keeter.

Other factors also bolstered Pew Research's conclusion that the trend was real, though the report also stressed that few people say abortion is a critical issue today (15 percent) compared with 2006, when 28 percent described abortion as a critical issue facing the country.

Read the report and judge for yourself—and stay tuned for further readings on the trend.

Declining Support for Legal Abortion
  Aug Aug  
Abortion should be... 2008 2009 Change
Illegal in all/most cases 41 45 +4
Legal in all/most cases 54 47 -7
  Jan Aug  
Make abortion more difficult? 2007 2009  
Favor 35 41 +6
Oppose 56 50 -6
  Jul Aug  
Good to reduce # of abortions? 2005 2009  
Yes 59 65 +6
No 33 26 -7

Tags: polls

Tools: Share | | Comments (30) | Print

Reader Comments

Abortions CAUSE ectopic pregnancies

Mer of CA:

First of all, abortions actually CAUSE ectopic pregnancies to occur more often, by scarring the uterine wall. Often such scarring covers the opening into the womb from the fallopian tube, thus preventing the fertilized ovum/conceptus from entering the uterus to implant correctly in the uterine wall.

Second, removing an ectopic pregnancy is not a true abortion, because the intent is not to kill the child, but to save the mother. Current technology cannot support such a young child, so his/her death is an unfortunate result of the life-saving surgery needed to prevent his/her mother's fallopian tube from rupturing.

Finally, the abortion that actually prevents a woman from dying due to pregnancy complications is a rare abortion indeed. Planned Parenthood's own research arm, the Guttmacher Institute, admits that most abortions are committed for social concerns (motherhood vs college/career, does not desire more children, etc.), not medical reasons (fetal anomaly, mother's life at risk). See http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.html

Love:

RCharles your basic attempts with Blah Blah Blah does nothing but show you have no facts or anything else that is worth reading.

Your elementary bully attempts don't hold any ground with the readers. Deflection does not hold any ground either.

I understand you have no defense for supporting the slaughter of the least of our people. Therefore you resort to personal and relgion attacks to justify. It does not hold any ground.

Either state facts to answer these questions with sources or be ignored.

Why do you support the horrific slaughter of the unborn children?

Why do you think the strong have the right to murder the weak?

Explain how the abortion slaughter is love for the unborn child?

Why do you think some human life is more important than other human life?

Why don't you respect and protect human life?

Why do you feel that an unborn baby with unique human DNA is not important and can be killed for any reason?

My guess is that your replies will dodge all these questions or that you have no answer for these questions and can not answer.

Love Life

Blah blah blah -

ComPassion the automaton - can't discuss, can't think independently, can't get past deep religious superstitions. Lots of meaningless data but no insight.

ComPassion, anyone can copy and paste - it is a brainless escape from open discussion and intelligent consideration of the facts.

You MUST study the facts in order to communicate; study the facts before commenting.

RCharles

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Free Trial!

Get the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine free for four weeks!

Jodie Allen is senior editor at the Pew Research Center. She joined the Pew Center from U.S. News & World Report where she was a managing editor and the business editor and also wrote a bi-weekly column on the political economy. She came to U.S. News from Slate Magazine, where she was the Washington bureau chief. Before joining Slate she was the editor of Outlook, the Sunday commentary section of the Washington Post. She has also been an editorial writer and business columnist with the Post.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.