Friday, November 27, 2009

Nation & World

God and Country by Dan Gilgoff

Does Ruth Bader Ginsburg Support Eugenics?

July 14, 2009 01:10 PM ET | Dan Gilgoff | Permanent Link | Print

Reader Comments

Cancer

Ruth Baden Gingsburg: I've heard sometime ago that you had cancer and have had a few set backs but you always pull thru...and thats what really galls me. You rank as one of the worst, if not the worst judge, we ever had on the supreeme court and i always wish for the worst whenever i hear that you going back to the hospital...I'm sure you know your really no good, and you really know there never was a judge as terrible eas you, and yet you strugle to remain....Why??? Please do the United States a great favor...Quit the Supreeme Court..or at least die so we don't have to listen to your stupidity..We need judges that judge by the constitution...Not judges that make laws at the bench,,Like yourself...I should be ashamed but i'll tell you why i'm not..I'm an American that loves this country and i really hate people like you that hates this country and its constitution..You know that as well as me...

Looking for the dream of a King

At her age and the effects of the possible on set of alzheimer's...she was releasing information held by a select few.

Fear and hate, no nation is safe from fascism.

Why aim to remove an entire race such as the black race?

Those that take evolution to the extreme and see it as their obligation to mankind to exterminate an entire race of people...even with a holocaust museum in our nations capitol, and yet abortion and sterilization is the norm?

How ironic that she is a supreme court justice...and unable to judge others by the content of their character but only by the color of their skin. ( Pray for deliverance )

The Minority "Problem"

Abortion is used in this country to keep minorities in the minority. Sanger was a racist. Planned Parenthood and the 1973 Supreme Court Justices who voted to allow abortion are guilty of more murders than Hitler, Stalin, Mao, & Saddam put together.

The Excerpt is Misleading

As a reporter, you ought to research the full quote. Here is the rest of it:

"...Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong."

So actually, Justice Ginsburg was just explaining that her initial fears about Roe v. Wade were unfounded. The excerpt is misleading.

The intent is clear

I don’t know how anyone can say she is talking about other’s opinions or opinions of the time Roe was instated because she says “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that WE DON’T WANT to have too many of.

If she had been expressing the opinion of the times, she would have stated “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that THEY DIDN’T want to have too many of.

Liberal fascists always slip up at some point and reveal their true intent. When they realize what they have done, they try to back peddle by stating their words are out of context or misunderstood. We all know the truth, and so does anyone who heard it or read what she said. Add to this the notion that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, is on record as being an advocate of eugenics particularly as they apply to blacks, I think Ginsburg’s comments are all too clear.

It's Clear

I don’t know how anyone can say she is talking about other’s opinions or opinions of the time Roe was instated because she says “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that WE DON’T WANT to have too many of.

If she had been expressing the opinion of the times, she would have stated “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that THEY DIDN’T WANT to have too many of.

Liberal fascists always slip up at some point and reveal their true intent. When they realize what they have done, they try to back peddle by stating their words are out of context or misunderstood. We all know the truth, and so does anyone who heard it or read what she said. Add to this the notion that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, is on record as being an advocate of eugenics particularly as they apply to Blacks, I think Ginsburg’s comments are all too clear.

Evil people run the world and they probably always will...

Looking at history, I think it is a fact that evil people run the world and probably always will unless good people do something. It doesn't matter what they call themselves-liberal, Democrat, Republican, conservative, fascist, capitalist, communist, socialist, environmentalist, or whatever. They are in power because they lust after it and/or are brainwashed “useful idiots” and most importantly, the existing powerful, rich people want them there. They tell us what we want to hear and make excuses for previous "mistakes" and give people "good" reasons for laws they want passed, etc. but they are just manipulations used for control. Of course, there is the rare exception but the rest of them directly or indirectly (via ignorance) represent the true power and greed that runs the world.

They have claimed for decades that abortion was about women’s rights and if you said anything different then you were anti-woman or a religious freak or both but really all it was about was eugenics and population control-people sacrificing their first born to the king-our system. There are thousands of examples of the population control religion from billionaires talking about it and meeting about it (“Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation”-Times of London) to John Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, who wrote “It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions” on p.786 of his book "Ecoscience" to George HW Bush’s Family Planning Act and the sterilization of Native American women according to former US Senator Abourezk to many other examples. Sorry, all were honest mistakes. Now, what do you think is the true aim of all the corporate-sponsored climate change propaganda? Perhaps, it is a way to get people to accept there are too many of us so we need to reduce the world’s population because we are killing the earth so it's for our own good. How about them apples? Or, them “Green” apples?

Also, could this have something to do with government provided and controlled healthcare? I predict that shortly after it is implemented that it will become clear that there are not enough resources to provide for everybody, but of course, this will not include the rich, etc. so what is the difference between this and the one we have today? It actually could be worse because it may become illegal to provide healthcare to certain individuals. Negative eugenics done positively, that is, we care so much about everybody but we just can't provide for everybody and we're sorry but at least it will be good for the environment. Also, if they cared so much about human rights and life, why is the US always bombing one country or another whether or not a Democrat or Republican is in office? And you think they care about you and poor people and want to provide healthcare for everybody? I know they will definitely universally provide a few medical treatments-abortions, sterilizations, and euthanizations. Good luck to all of us, we are going to need it.

Is this really the time we want to take Prayer out!!!!

It is clear what she is saying to me and it speaks volumes. It is also clear that if people truelly read up on who and what the PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDERS were about they would see the same thing. They too believed in Eugenics and followed it...PROGRESSIVE AGENGA!!! I pray that our country moves into another direction but with all these new directions that Obama has forced us into I wonder what my kids have to look forward to. between Cap and trade the new healthcare bills all I can do is pray. And bringing the topic back to the point Jusstice Ginsberg Clearly was saying something only if people knew that California passed law before Nazi Germany did in WW2 in I think it was 1903 or 08 involving the eugenics movements.... again the progressive movement. Luckily we just didnt have Hitler as our dictator. LOOK IT UP!!!!

sotomayor as the next woman supreme justice.

I am in full support of Sonja Sotomayor for our next woman supreme justice. Hopefully things in this world will continue to change for the betterment of all minorities. I am Native American living in South Dakota. we continue to deal with a duel federal justice system, if your a native, you automatically get the maximum sentence, now if your a white person, you will get a slap on the wrist and get probation, from taking someone's life to stealing a dollar candy! Either way, a Native American is doomed in the federal justice system in South Dakota. We've had these Supreme Justices for ages, I think they were all immigrants with one set of the rule of law, Theirs, interpreted by them to fit their own agenda. We all know they do not want a minority on one of the highest office of the USA. Native Americans need to speak up, We need someone to speak up for us.One thing for sure, justice Ginsburg's support of eugenics of the poor, minorities, disabled people and residents of appalachia; we're here to stay, no matter how oppressed we may be or want to be, We need a change and alot of hope for the betterment of our next generation.

it does not matter

Knowing or expecting something heinious to happen and not doing anything about it is at the very least morally reprehensible. If something is alive and you terminate that life then you are killing it...it doesn't matter at what stage of development it is...you are snuffing out its life and therefore killing it...seems logical to me. Considering that Margaret Sanger believed in eugenics Ms. Ginsburg's statement does not surprise me. At the very least, even if she is not endorsing it, she is admitting to it and that should cause every American to stand up and listen to the true historical background behind abortion in America. B.t.w. who exactly gets to decide if you or I belong to a desirable or undesirable group? Hitler had the SS. Who does America have? Pretty scary stuff.

Add your thoughts

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.
U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Public Poll

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

People who read this also read ...

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Delegates arrive at a gathering of the Alliance of Religions and Conservation at Windsor Castle today outside of London today. Britain's Prince Philip is founder of the Alliance and is cohosting the event with the United Nations. The gathering features representatives from nine world religions and was kicked off by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

A Muslim man lifts his hands up during Friday noon prayers in the southern holy city of Karbala, south of Baghdad.

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

The Maqbara hermitage at the Lama Foundation where a person can go on solo retreat.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Special Report: Women of the Bible

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.