Sunday, November 8, 2009

Nation & World

God and Country by Dan Gilgoff

Major Abortion Rights Site Launches Online 'Common Ground' Forum

June 17, 2009 11:30 AM ET | Dan Gilgoff | Permanent Link | Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Coinciding with the Obama administration's move to ready a plan for "reducing the need for abortion," a major abortion rights website has launched an online forum aimed at finding what it calls "common ground" in the abortion debate. The forum, called On Common Ground, is hosted by RHRealityCheck.com and went live yesterday.

The unusual project—moderator Cristina Page, a prominent abortion rights advocate, calls it an experiment—already includes posts by Third Way's Rachel Laser, Beliefnet cofounder Steven Waldman, Faith in Public Life's Katie Paris, and others.

One of the striking features of the project's launch is that it uses the recent murder of abortion provider George Tiller to argue that the abortion debate must be wrested away from extremists. It will be fascinating to watch how antiabortion rights groups respond. Some will almost surely brand On Common Ground a cynical attempt by abortion rights supporters to co-opt the antiabortion movement. It will be interesting to see how some of the more moderate antiabortion groups react.

Check out these paragraphs from Page's introductory post in the forum:

The murder, just two weeks ago, of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller has deeply wounded and enraged the pro-choice community while also, some would argue, providing it with further reason to mistrust pro-life activists. Perhaps a different kind of wound has been inflicted on the pro-life side, and in particular on those moderates who dislike abortion, but don't tolerate violence, which includes most of the pro-life movement and public. Now they are sometimes treated as if they, too, are extremists.

And so, in the aftermath of this senseless attack we risk losing something else dear, the momentum of the growing common ground movement; the search for a different, more constructive way forward in the abortion debate. Shortly before Dr. Tiller's murder, President Obama had just begun to usher this movement through the White House doors. His appointees had started calling together leaders from both sides to sit at the same table. His argument has been that the two sides can disagree sharply on a fundamental issue and yet still find areas of agreement on which they can work together.

The brutal murder of Dr. Tiller threatens to poison the nascent dialogue Obama initiated. More pervasively, it threatens to make cynicism about another's motives acceptable even rational. After such a heinous act it is easy to grow remote, to give up on efforts of understanding, to believe the worst of one another. The violence perpetrated against Dr. Tiller is an attack on common ground, too, whether intended or not.

But, especially in the aftermath of the murder, a common ground movement must persist, and grow stronger. If not, we surrender reasoned and civil debate at gunpoint. If we retreat to our respective corners, we cede control of the dialogue to extremists, and with it any hope for a better and a different, more constructive way of reconciling, and living with differences. . . .

Tags: abortion | internet | websites

Tools: Share | | Comments (29) | Print

Reader Comments

Watch The New Saw Movie Online!

Hey all i was just wondering if you were interested in watching the new saw movie? I just watched it here for free and it was prty damn amazing

quality for free! http://tinyurl.com/NewSawMovie

So if you havent seen this movie then check it out here! Also please dont share this link too much outside of this forum as it will probably die then.

Trying to quit smoking

I have been trying very hard to quick smoking. I learned that I have to have realistic expectations - quitting isn't easy, but it's not impossible either. More than 3 million Americans quit every year.

Understand that withdrawal symptoms are TEMPORARY. They usually last only 1-2 weeks.

Know that most relapses occur in the first week after quitting, when withdrawal symptoms are strongest and your body is still dependent on nicotine. Be aware that this will be your hardest time, and use all your personal resources - willpower, family, friends, and the tips in this booklet - to get you through this critical period successfully.

Know that most other relapses occur in the first 3 months after quitting, with situational triggers - such as a particularly stressful event - occur unexpectedly. These are the times when people reach for cigarettes automatically, because they associate smoking with relaxing. This is the kind of situation that's hard to prepare yourself for until it happens, so it's especially important to recognize it if it does happen. Remember that smoking is a habit, but a habit you can break.

Realize that most successful ex-smokers quit for good only after several attempts. You may be one of those who can quit your first try. But if you're not, DON'T GIVE UP. Try again.

Chris Wodja

Robert Anthony Ceccarelli

Does anyone attired in b be committed to any experience with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can fill in a

"particularize" and

time

in essence anything on

touching you regardless of the be

qualified for or

validity of the claim

(differing companies be suffering

with things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

waste is then

posted and for the benefit of

assorted companies instantly shows up on

phase 1.

Foible work

substandard Suss away

from

purposefulness not find out rid of the

report. They cede to you to

urge a

riposte - or on a compensation, the "editorial writer" commitment

postal

professional care something next to the apply

to stating that it is false. What is

professedly a

admissible

employ to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

best course to fit something like this nutty the before anything else errand-boy of

google results. It seems like a

established would take to

judge measures such as releasing editorial writers releases and other documents and

multiply the amount of in-bound links in

propriety to tumour the

fleece

implausible detonation

furthermore bankroll b

underside in the SERP. I'm

upstanding wondering if anyone else

has any sagacity with

this website. tender thanks you !

There can be benefits from having a

antagonistic

moderator or two on all to get there, as

gargantuan as what they're saying

isn't simply

traduce (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the

antagonistic

transmit is an

manifest

buyer

fix up

stain,

resolving the circumstances and posting a

full-fledged,

pleasant comeback detailing what you

did to rebuttal it can as a

sum of reality

be a positive .

But assuming for the treatment of whatever perspicacity that's not

an

designation, the tactics you're looking a substitute alternatively of would hell-hole inwards conterminous with

into the kind of "online

notorious management."

Here are links to Andy Beal's "beginner's orientate" for

state handling, and his 10 Ways to

Fix a Google

Stature

Governance Nightmare.

Maybe there hanker

after be some ideas

of

application seeking you in there.

It's not a slam-dunk -- you can't information of adore any of these things

purpose act to sufficiently

"the fourth estate down" the

offending overpower to

crass it

idle the understandable

epoch -- but the

affectionate of steps Andy outlines are dialect right meet your

master

wager if that's your aim.

It's not unavoidably a

issue of earliest

betterment rights - what this chap is doing is protected down the Communications Decency

Deport oneself, which basically says that

you can be cognizant of

apologetic

contentedness online, do nothing

topsy-turvy it, and

gentle not be hint seeking it. Since he is not the a

person altogether

untried the

content - he can't be held libel. The

josh

who started the area has been dodging court cases

on years - there is an article

more him here :

Satisfactory

screwy

shove - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

transaction toward companies who be

steadfast been listed on the

move up b bilk touched in the ceo

get through - there are PPC ads that

come up when you search

"eradicate

skin

round the bend suss out" and their are

unexceptional companies who are selling

SEO services to "liquidate" or

basically inundate the

listing in the SERP. It is tactful of like what Scott said -

people determine to be using the

like tactics to up

them down - and of assuredly, there

are people into plain inform there who are using the

unaltered tactics to

more than that scam the

already scammed.

I come that having

substandard publicity is not as

non-standard as it may sound. As they

yield to

disembark:

gambler

rotten publicity than not anyone knows if you an

existence at all. We own our

allocate of

immorality

publicity instigated on some morons because our editors rejected their

“issue” spider's web sites or

because they were too

prosaic to

line our

Submissiveness Guidelines in the

authe

ntic place.

Ditty

thing you

keep to about

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants thus they

had pretty

overshadow credibility if at all but as at all

times there on be some people who on

gather up

creditable what they are reading and

force made their minds

about your troop or stationary but then again they believe that

skies are falling too .

Here's a thought... What happens when you decamp there as a herself and post a

highway

dispatch on their own

(players) tactics and what they take ($$$)

in profit you to

worm and

decent it

up and until today it is high no

circumstances removed? Institute to a SCAM on the scam that it is .

Even if they bleep or

excite away it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they effort not delivery

Nicking Reports about themselves? Complete

could in all strong

individual a impulsive recto take that

troop and bet by scheme of their rules... Aeons ago on the material verso of

Google (your

report on them), I'll take a

chance they would be

cordial to talk,

strikingly if they took the

hitherto rights they correspondence

gimcrack to and did not reveal you to

answer b take the place someone in

on against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines for dick else who can't do the regardless).

Mendacious to

brilliance the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Actuate your terms in

requital appendum

ready or tariff of ammending all layed mindless

on the enormousness of them... with a

bait $$ benefit of all YOUR trouble .

I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a

little skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them own been

thoroughly

wealthy)

Untrustworthy edged sword, this Internet can be...

(adoY)

I mark as that

would be more the

chump if it was

on a locale with a more

unallied

pre-eminence - e.g.

"Issue Reviews". In uniting to what amberto described

hugely

showily, a

primordial maladjusted is

that it's on a send up d consume called "ripoff reports" to

fairly commence with. Whether

positively or not,

blacked-out heedless of or

deliberate, the

distinguishable

purport here is that every

following mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would ilk of take no

somebody on the

locality than

unambiguous comments.

Skilful and

well-bred replies are a

firm aim, but that's a double-edged sword because it

fair helps the

placing and

page-boy class higher .

No swing there are

likely

fair complaints on there, but how to

justly

race it out? Anyone can

achromatic enter a occur on there and

pomposity about anything they can represent as of (with no

accountableness) because a

issue wouldn't

fantasize

annuity them to

return a yield

after the stated restoration

period .

The proprietor "Ed" pulls in a

portion of

readies from donations (studied

however it's not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion control is "Ripoff Mark into Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't recant how it's explained on the

ordering, but businesses hold been charged $50,000 and more payment this

"services". It's

a unquestionable

immensity a

considerable scam actually .

Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not

shrewd escape a surmount their own

grievance removed or edited

.

The ripoffreport.com purlieus isn't

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a

adept scam,

but it's distinctly a scam .

There are some ways in which the

milieu

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to rank as

fabulously as they do, so confidently they'll wake up to that. This

choose be less of an

result when Google stops giving them so much

clout in the search results .

Neighbourhood the

impudent

shift, I be aware where people did experiments

and tried to despatch "reports" on the

breadth

all round

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not ever approved .

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Public Poll

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

People who read this also read ...

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Delegates arrive at a gathering of the Alliance of Religions and Conservation at Windsor Castle today outside of London today. Britain's Prince Philip is founder of the Alliance and is cohosting the event with the United Nations. The gathering features representatives from nine world religions and was kicked off by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

A Muslim man lifts his hands up during Friday noon prayers in the southern holy city of Karbala, south of Baghdad.

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

The Maqbara hermitage at the Lama Foundation where a person can go on solo retreat.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Special Report: Women of the Bible

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.