Obama's New Vatican Ambassador: Another Nod to Catholic Church's New U.S. Complexion
By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country
In announcing his selection of a Hispanic Roman Catholic theologian as Vatican ambassador last night, days after picking a Hispanic Catholic for the Supreme Court, Barack Obama continues his campaign to acknowledge the new Latino complexion of the Catholic Church in America in a big way.
Obama's selection of the Cuban-born Miguel Diaz as ambassador to the Holy See offers a striking contrast to the Vatican's own recent decision a few months ago to forgo a Latino figure to serve as archbishop of New York, the closest thing that America has to a pope. The church instead chose Timothy Dolan, a white Irish-American who represents the fastest-shrinking component of the Catholic Church in America.
Prominent lefty Catholic Thomas Reese characterizes the church's shifting demographics today:
One out of three Catholics has left the church according to a study by the Pew Forum. The only reason Catholics continue to be a stable percentage of the U.S. population is that Hispanics are making up for the white Catholics who are leaving.
In picking a well-respected theologian with apparently close ties to the Catholic Church—Diaz is a former academic dean at a regional seminary in Florida and a board member of the Catholic Theological Society of America—as its envoy to Rome, Obama will most likely avoid kicking up the kind of conservative Catholic opposition that would have ensued had he chosen a Catholic Democratic politician.
Even a purportedly antiabortion-rights Democrat would have provoked attacks from the right if he or she had anything less than a 100 percent antiabortion-rights voting record.
And by declining to appoint a politician or Democratic donor to the post, friends of the administration say Obama signaled that he was taking this pick seriously. In fact, there appears to be little if any precedent for plucking a theologian for the post.
Some other facts about Diaz:
—According to the Associated Press, he served on the Obama campaign's Catholic advisory board during the presidential campaign.
—Diaz is the first person in his family to go to college. His father, Felix, worked as a waiter and his mother, Silvia, as a data entry operator.
—He's married to a theologian and has four children.
—Diaz is a former president of the Academy of Catholic Hispanic Theologians of the United States.
—He was one of 26 big-name Catholics to sign a statement praising Kathleen Sebelius as "a woman of deep faith" when her appointment to head the Health and Human Services Department was under attack from conservative Catholics earlier this year.
- Follow Dan Gilgoff on Twitter.
- Read more about the Obama administration.
Tags: religion | Catholicism | Obama administration | Vatican
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (6) | Print
Reader Comments
Ambassador
It often depends on the circumstances of each individual country. For instance, it was reported that a homosexual nominated from France was rejected and a person who was divorced and remarried in Argentina was rejected to be Argentina's ambassador
(a country with perhaps more practicing Catholics). Most nominations seem to be accepted however.
Reply to Muser
Actually, a number of countries do not send Catholics as their Vatican ambassadors. Britain has a history of sending protestants, probably reflecting that the monarch is not a Catholic. Reports are that the Vatican unofficially rejected the people who the Obama admin had previously unofficially proposed (e.g. Caroline Kennedy) because they were blatantly in support of abortion and killing human embryos for their stem cells. I recall a Bishop working at the Vatican explaining to the media that the Vatican did not require envoys to agree with Catholic dogma but they do require them to be in agreement on basic understandings of human rights that are revealed to all by natural law (e.g. killing innocent human beings is wrong).
Another shameful choice
The article failed to report that this so called "theologian" has promoted heretical views in the past,,,namely a thing called Liberation Theology of the Rev. Wright variety. Above and beyond that, the nominated "theologian" gave financial support to get Obama elected so he is obviously not pro-life.
Either one of these things should have disqualified him for the nomination. This is the fourth or fifth candidate nominated for this position and it's a shame that this administration has so far refused to choose someone fitting for the office.
advertisement







