Does Rick Warren's Muslim Outreach Represent the Evangelical World?
Rick Warren's appearance over the weekend at the Muslim Public Affairs Council conference in Long Beach, Calif., got some attention over what the purpose-driven pastor had to say about gays in light of the controversy that his scheduled appearance at Barack Obama's inauguration has stirred up. "For the media's purpose, I happen to love gays and straights," Warren told the audience, noting that he'd met the musician Melissa Etheridge, a lesbian, backstage at the conference and that he'd long been a fan.
Interesting. But I was struck more by the Warren's appearance as the keynote speaker before the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), since evangelical figures have been among the nation's most high-profile critics of Islam. Search for "Islam" on Focus on the Family's website and you'll get results mostly on "radical" or "militant" Islam. A poll last year by the Pew Forum for Religion & Public Life showed that white evangelicals take a much dimmer view of Muslims than Americans of other religious traditions:
Among religious groups, white evangelical Protestants stand out for their negative views of Muslims. While roughly half of white mainline Protestants (51 percent) and white Catholics (48 percent) express favorable views of Muslims, only about quarter of white evangelicals (24 percent) say the same. Similar religious divisions are seen in views of Muslim Americans.
I spoke with MPAC executive director Salam Al-Marayati about Muslim-evangelical relations. Excerpts:
Were you surprised that Rick Warren agreed to address the Muslim Public Affairs Council?
The Orange County Muslim community was engaged with his church before this year, so we weren't surprised. He was very open and we met with him after various positive interactions and he agreed to speak at our convention.
Would you say that Warren's willingness to engage with Muslims is representative of the wider evangelical world, or is he an anomaly?
We see the same spirit of constructive engagement with other evangelicals, including Chris Seiple [president of the Institute for Global Engagement] and Joel Hunter, who has one of the largest churches in Florida. We have very positive relationships with the Fuller Seminary.
Are you saying the evangelical voices that publicly condemn Islam are in the minority?
There is a vocal group that includes people like Pat Robertson who have been very negative and that has sown enmity between the Muslims and Christians and has dictated the discourse. But it's the same between Christian extremists and Muslim extremists....
Extremists get the attention and disproportionately influence the relationship with the other. So if we have Muslim extremists causing destruction, they get all the attention and the moderates are dismissed. The criticism is that the moderates aren't speaking out enough. We don't know the percentage [of evangelicals] that Robertson or [Focus on the Family founder] James Dobson represents. They're certainly significant but they are two voices. The rise of people like Rick Warren and Chris Seiple and Joel Hunter has changed that in the last 10 years.... It's a much needed and refreshing phase in terms of Christian-Muslim relations that we're in right now.
The more enmity there is between Christians and Muslims, the more the argument that religion is irrelevant is going to become a reality among Americans. There is a need for religion in terms of peacemaking and dealing with poverty and in dealing with not only the economic crisis but also the spiritual crisis. We need to keep religion relevant.
How do Muslim relations with American evangelicals compare with their relations with other religious traditions?
The other two groups are Catholics and Jews. We have more of a history and have made more advances but have more challenges. We've learned in those experiences that the dialogue must have a social goal. If we go back to theology, there is nothing achievable, nothing to gain. There must be a social commitment with the goal of benefiting society... it's up to God to decide in the next life who's right and wrong.
- Read more by Dan Gilgoff.
Tags: religion | Rick Warren
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (9) | Print
Reader Comments
response to "Look in a mirror"
Both sides have done things that are not right. Does this mean that we have to continue on this road to destruction? Both beliefs have good and bad. Can we not look at the other and see the good and live with this? I fail to see how killing each other can make a better life for the ones left behind. All I see is the death and destruction of the ones we love. Be it the Holy Bible or the Koran. Religion should be a personal thing that we feel inside. Not a public issue that we have to kill each other over. God will fix it all in the end. All we need to do is live our lives by his word and be at peace with one another. No matter which book we call the "ONLY" one. Do we really believe that God would want us killing each other over a "book"? If you believe in your religion then tell me how you can want all the bloodshed that has been happening.
I don't want anyone dying for my religion!
Name calling is childish and unnecessary. Insults are rediculus. Killing each other is pointless as this only makes another generation hostile and the circle never gets broken. Lets all live in peace in the glory of "OUR GOD" (whoever your choice is) and hope for the best on the other side.
I hope I have not offended you but this is what I feel and see.
look in a mirror
Well if the Christians would stop imprisoning without charge(Guantanamo), torturing (abu Gharib) and burning Muslims at the steak (it’s not that they have stopped burring people at the steak, it’s that they have better munitions, cluster bombs, land mines, laser guided missiles…) we’ll have more to talk about. Things like preemptive war, mutually assured destruction, global warming, ethnic cleansing of four of the six inhabitable continents and counting, world wars, colonialism, government protected institutionalized slavery, the inquisition, crusades …………………………………. Can you be a good Christian and not be an enabler of these things? Evidence indicates otherwise.
However, in Islam injustice should be fought against, self determination should be fought for. If you want to call the resistance movements “insurgents” while championing the “surge” you probably think hypocrisy is an art form. Freedom of religion in the US is as tenuous as the Bush Administration’s touch with reality.
Muslim Moderates
I am a Muslim living in America. I assure you I am a good citizen and continue to be. So, yes, it is possible to be a Muslim in America. In response to the comment Mr. Bob made about our Quran, "infidels" are persecuters. If you are Christian, Mr.Bob, then surely you know the story of Moses? The Egyptians were persecuters and thus "infidels". Persecution should be discouraged and fought. Muslims also believe Jesus was a prophet and we do not need to hear Christian ideals on him. Americans do not live under Christian "authority" either. SALAM(peace)
advertisement







