Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Christian Right, Bush and Abstinence Education to Blame for Rising Teen Pregnancy

July 21, 2009 03:58 PM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link | Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

I recall conversing with a friend about six months into the George W. Bush administration after he took over from President Clinton. She said something to the effect of, "isn't it amazing how you can go politically backward in time by about 50 years in the space of six actual months?" She sure was right. I felt as if I was in a grinder during George W.'s eight years in office, transforming us into something archaic and pushing us back in time into some unknown era of paleontology. This latest report from the Centers for Disease Control confirms it. All that talk of creationism and abstinence-only education set us back behind our global competitors such as India and China in terms of young Americans' scientific education. It also set us back in terms of fighting unwed teen pregnancy and spread of sexually-transmitted diseases. As the Guardian reports:

Teenage pregnancies and syphilis have risen sharply among a generation of American school girls who were urged to avoid sex before marriage under George Bush's evangelically-driven education policy, according to a new report by the US's major public health body

...According to the CDC, birth rates among teenagers aged 15 or older had been in decline since 1991 but are up sharply in more than half of American states since 2005. The study also revealed that the number of teenage females with syphilis has risen by nearly half after a significant decrease while a two-decade fall in the gonorrhea infection rate is being reversed. The number of Aids cases in adolescent boys has nearly doubled.

While we're at it let's not forget something that is rarely addressed in mainstream media. The Christian Right is playing a part in increasing unwed motherhood. By urging single young women not to use birth control (because they shouldn't have sex until they're married) and not to have abortions if they become pregnant, they play a large but so-far unrecognized role in the dramatic and sad rise in unwed motherhood in the U.S. It's time we place blame for that squarely where it belongs. Sure there are lots of other factors: the media, culture, etc. But preaching abstinence until marriage along with stigmatizing abortion is also a factor and should be credited as such.

Tags: teen pregnancy | pregnancy

Tools: Share | | Comments (32) | Print

Reader Comments

The Half Truth

The single biggest influence on children are their parents, not the govt. Abstinence preaching was a good thing. This opinion-report author seems to suggest that teens got pregnant just because they heard the abstinence message or that she favors abortions just to make pregnancy rate look respectably low. It is not as if the Bush govt had banned birth control. There are any number of factors influencing teens. Parents have to educate their kids and monitor them, period, and hope for the best.

Thank God it's only a BLOG...

This woman is basically harmless. Not only for her '80s mentality, but for her over-the-top, in-your-face leftist opinions. She makes it very easy to just click away from her page. The only reason her TV show is broadcast is because PBS has to continue to air extreme liberal views to keep that money flowing in from the left.

About the content of the article; can anyone take seriously an "opinion" of a "report" given about a "report" quoted (no doubt out of context) by a leftist publication?

Consider this:

This piece is 15 days old - that's 360 Hours.

An entire 30 comments have been posted since then. That's 1 comment every 12 hours.

Last night (8/3) I logged onto a REAL news site. I read a current blog post, then I looked at the comment stats. The piece was posted (8/3) @ 7:32p (EST).

By 11:06p (EST) 831 comments had been posted. In three and one-half hours.

That's 237 comments in 1 HOUR. At the current rate, that would be 2,844 comments in 12 hours!

Ooooh, she's so scary!

The dog that didn't bark

If Bush's policies are so horrible, why did it take 4 years for them to have any impact on these rates, hmm?

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

advertisement

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.