Obama's Roadless Forest Timeout a Good Start on Protecting the Environment
By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.
The Obama administration's temporary timeout on new development of road-less areas within national forests is a very good beginning. But it's a fraction of what the Administration needs to do to live up to the President's promise to protect the environment. The timeout was issued yesterday by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who will have to personally approve any new project:
Vilsack's order, which will be in effect for a year, is the latest turn in an eight-year-old battle over 58.5 million acres of pristine woods. President Bill Clinton made these areas off-limits in 2001, but President George W. Bush effectively reopened some in 2005. That led to a series of court cases that ultimately replaced the national policy with a patchwork of regional rules.
President Obama has made history committing federal funds to green research and alternative energy sources. That, too, is a great step forward. But there is much more to undo. As USA Today's Traci Watson has pointed out:
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar canceled Bush Administration drilling plans for public lands in Utah and Wyoming. He's also re-evaluating President Bush's offshore drilling plan.
The administration needs an energy plan, and it will be difficult to come up with one that satisfies the industry and environmentalists.
The President has pledged to make science-based decisions in terms of environmental preservation and elsewhere. That is such a stark difference from the Bush Administration's slash-and-burn attitude toward the environment, anyone would look good by comparison.
Check out our political cartoons.
Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.
Tags: environment | Obama administration
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (4) | Print
Reader Comments
roadless forests
stopp[ng drilling only suceeds in keeping oil prices high.Quit sending our oil money to foreign countries that support terror,and dislike us very much.As far as enviromental damage,make the epa do their job.Drilling can be done in enviromentally safe ways.Same for power grid construction.
Roadless Protections -- Good for outdoor recreation
Because the Roadless Rule doesn't reduce current levels of access and protects unique recreation opportunities, it has received the support of The Outdoor Industry Association and literally hundreds of outdoor recreation businesses across the country.
http://www.oregonwild.org/about/press-room/press-releases/outdoor-businesses-cheer-obama-roadless-announcement
No one buys tents, hiking boots, backpacks or fishing rods to go play in the clearcuts! It's just one more reason to support strong federal protections of what is left of our pristine roadless wildlands.
The Future
In order to "protect" nature humans will be kept out of it.
The legacy of the neo-pantheist, Environmentalist religion will be closed roads, fences, gates and "Keep Out" signs. Our children will never know outdoor recreation - The war against it increases every year.
In no other area of our society would we accept the disenfranchisement of families with young children, the aged, the infirm or the handicapped from public places. I guess under the Green Banner all things are acceptable.
Going Green Has Gone Too Far!
advertisement




