Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Climate Change Raises Threat of Global Starvation

May 13, 2009 12:30 PM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link | Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

America's Greatest Generation, coming of age before and during World War II, was admonished to leave no spinach behind by parents who warned, "Children are starving in Europe."

Boomers, postwar babies, were similarly taunted to eat food young children normally take a scunner to with the phrase, "Children are starving in India and China."

I'm not sure to which region of the world parents of generation X & Y children turned to convince kids that empty dinner plates were a sine qua non to a meal's conclusion, except perhaps war zones such as Sudan or Rwanda. The last two decades have produced few if any mass starvations that were not driven by war.

Developing nations' starvation-free status is a relatively new phenomenon. It only came about since the 1960s as a result of the so-called Green Revolution. Developed nations could not stand idly by as their farmers produced abundant surpluses, while Asian and African children perished for lack of rice or bread. So they exported irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides, high-growth seeds, and a panoply of agricultural techniques that allowed Indian, Chinese, and other farmers in starvation-ravaged states to increase yields exponentially. But the same Green Revolution that kept the world fed lo' these past three decades is starting to splinter if not pulverize.

National Public Radio has aired a fascinating two part series on India's Green Revolution and its downward spiral toward brown.

The first part tells the tale of the Punjab region, India's wheat and rice belt, where the water table has been so depleted by the vacuum of increasing irrigation, it threatens to collapse, possibly quickly:

The state's agriculture "has become unsustainable and nonprofitable," according to a recent report by the Punjab State Council for Science and Technology. Some experts say the decline could happen rapidly, over the next decade or so.

The second piece describes India's so-called cancer train, which carries some 60 people from a farm town in Punjab on an overnight journey to India's closest government-run cancer treatment hours and hours away:

People say they never used to see so many cancer patients in this farm region. Cancer was considered an urban disease, suffered by people who lived in cities choked with industry and pollution. But research by one of the most respected medical institutes in India recently found that farming villages using large amounts of pesticides have significantly higher rates of cancer than villages that use less of the chemicals.

Before the Green Revolution, it was fashionable to blame overpopulation for mass starvation. The explanation fell out of favor as the Malthusian claims in Paul Ehrlich's 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb proved wrong. Perhaps Ehrlich was just 40 years too early with his book, as the Malthusian catastrophe argument seems closer to reality now than four decades prior. This time, overpopulation combined with global warming (which is of course a product of overpopulation) may produce the next generation of food shortages.

A report released last month by the International Food Policy and Research Institute (IFPRI) warns climate change's effect on global commodity yields could have devastating effects on developing countries, where rainfall is already dangerously low. Food policy experts predict that by 2050, effects of climate change will cut global rain-dependent maize (corn) yields by 17 percent and irrigated rice yields by a fifth-as populations continue to surge. The IFPR is using these data to press for agriculture's representation at a United Nations meeting on climate change later this year in Copenhagen.

Perhaps man will be wily enough to sidestep, yet again, the looming specters of starvation and climate change. There are plenty of scientists who believe we are too far down the path to reverse much of the damage already done. Let's hope they're wrong. If not, we have only ourselves to blame for ignoring the truths of one generation and passing that ignorance on to the next.

Check out our political cartoons.

Tags: global warming

Tools: Share | | Comments (18) | Print

Reader Comments

Reply to ‘Green Arrow’ of CA

You wrote:

“All of the arguments posted here as comments and which are against climate change, came from the pen of Mark Morano.”

That’s not true, and I resent your implication of plagiarism. I already cited my sources and Mark Morano is not one of them. Furthermore, I am not Mark Morano. I have used my actual first name and my actual state of residence. With your false and reckless claim you are either lazy, dishonest, or both.

Climate change hysteria is just an excuse for more taxes and government control needed to advance the real objectives of socialists. From the beginning, they have always reached for pseudo-scientific rationales to conceal their true motivations, which is jealous greed for the property of others. So they oppose private property. This becomes clearer when watching the video listed below drawing parallels between the words Socialists and the words of Environmentalists. It shows their agenda in their own words, where man-made global warming is just the latest disguise.

Your attempt here is about as close as the AGW believers get to defending their position. Scientists concerned with their reputations find it increasingly difficult to support the man-made global warming theory, unless they are dependent on political patronage, or otherwise have a career hopelessly tied to it. In that case their support is required.

It isn't nice to fool with Mother Nature

OK. I did not quote the ad correctly. But, you should get the point. All of the arguments posted here as comments and which are against climate change, came from the pen of Mark Morano. He was once an aide to Oil State Senator James Inhofe and had a very explicit reason to sew fear and doubt and spread false information as if it were true.

Hold on to your beliefs folks. You won't suffer the consequences. It will be your children and their children and they will hate you for what you did not do.

A note to the reader:

I originally wrote the next three comments as one comment. But for reasons I still don't know, that comment was deleted several times by the censor after I posted it and after it appeared for several minutes each time in the column below. Somehow I was allowed to break it into three sections and post each separately below, but unfortunately they now show up in reverse order. Therefore please read the following three comments in this order so that they make sense:

1) Attn: Censor,

2) Attn: Censor, (second time)

3) Attn: Censor, (Third time)

Below that you can see where I explained to Mike of WA how the original comment, "mysteriously disappeared". It also "mysteriously disappeared" several more time after that, and still doesn't appear in this column anywhere. I expect 'revert wars' from the AGW zealots at Wikipedia (which is why I don't edit there), not USN&WR. I am painfully familiar with AGW believers’ insistence on deleting what they cannot refute; as if the First Amendment only protects the rights of people they agree with. USN&WR has a very long tradition of looking at all sides of issues, even those Mortimer Zuckerman himself disagrees with. Therefore we can respectfully disagree, and hopefully continue to do so in a civilized manner.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

advertisement

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.