Friday, November 27, 2009

Opinion

Absurd Supreme Court Challenge on Animal Cruelty

January 07, 2009 11:30 AM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link | Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Ever heard of a "crush" video? Me neither. Until I read about a case in which the Supreme Court will decide later this year whether selling videos of dog fights is constitutionally protected free speech. 

Of course it is not protected. But let's get back to crush videos (in which small animals are crushed) for the moment. Congress banned them in 1999—and all video depictions of unlawful cruelty to animals. Good move, Congress.

Now the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia has overturned the law, ruling, in the case of a man selling dog fight videos, that dog fight videos are constitutionally protected free speech. What a bunch of poppycock! And even the Bush administration Justice Department, which appealed the Third Circuit's ruling to the Supreme Court, agrees with me (how bizarre!).

Apparently free-speech zealots are tied up in knots over this one. Heaven knows why. First, "selling" videos is a commercial venture, and the courts have always awarded less protection to commercial speech than to free (political) speech. Second, study after study has shown that people who engage in animal cruelty go on to act out their mental illnesses on people, so it's better to "nip" these fetishes in the bud.

A ruling allowing sadistic vendors to sell videos of animal cruelty would only further other criminals' future careers as domestic violence perpetrators and murderers. New York Times reporter Adam Liptak wrote

Before the 1999 law was enacted, according to the Humane Society of the United States, there were some 2,000 crush videos available in the marketplace, for $15 to $300 each. After 1999, said Jonathan R. Lovvorn, chief counsel of the Humane Society, that market all but disappeared.

But since July, Mr. Lovvorn said, crush videos have "popped back up on the Internet as a result of the Third Circuit's ruling."

Mr. Lovvorn provided a reporter with links to two examples, one involving a kitten, the other a puppy. May you never see them. 

He's right.

Tags: Supreme Court | animal cruelty | animals

Tools: Share | | Comments (16) | Print

Reader Comments

adipex weight loss appetite supressant

BfPBJA Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!

DzrvRzuoKuAJk

2.txt;4;5

TwPpwKtqyK

2.txt;4;5

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

advertisement

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.