Saturday, July 19, 2008

Opinion

McCain-Obama Race Leaves No Candidate for Mainstream Voters or the Socially-Conscious Entrepreneurial Class

May 09, 2008 10:47 AM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link

A Barack Obama presidency would cost America's entrepreneurial class dearly. Obama has pledged to lift the current cap on Social Security taxes if he becomes president. He'd get support in that venture from a Democratic-controlled Congress. According to the Social Security Administration's website, this means an additional 15.3 percent tax for self-employed people making more than $102,000 annually.

"The Social Security tax rate for 2008 is 15.3 percent on self-employment income up to $102,000," the site notes. "If your net earnings exceed $102,000, you continue to pay only the Medicare portion of the Social Security tax, which is 2.9 percent, on the rest of your earnings."

Latte liberals now supporting Obama who are self-employed (consultants, lawyers, doctors, self-employed entrepreneurs) who earn, for example, $200,000 per year, will pay more than $15,000 in additional federal taxes if Obama is elected and succeeds in lifting the cap. That's quite a disincentive to work hard and earn above $100,000 annually. That's also a disincentive for self-employed small-business owners, who produced the lion's share of new employment during the past decade.

Despite Senator Obama's claim that Americans earning $200,000 or more are rich or in the "CEO" class, many of them live financially pinched existences. Consider the situation of a self-employed married saleswoman living in New York City or San Francisco or Chicago. She's the sole breadwinner for her husband and two children. She earns $200,000 per year, but she is hardly rich. If she owns a home at all (purchased since the last run-up in real estate prices) it may be a small apartment in the suburbs or exurbs, but certainly not a townhouse downtown. She's probably living paycheck to paycheck.

Yet Senator Obama told CNN that these are the people whose income he intends to go after:

OBAMA: I will raise CEO taxes, there is no doubt about it. If you are...

BLITZER: What about the average American?

OBAMA: If you are a CEO in this country, you will probably pay more taxes. They won't be prohibitively high. You're going to be paying roughly what you paid in the '90s when CEOs were doing just fine...If you're making $100,000 a year or less, then you're pretty solidly middle class and you deserve relief right now as opposed to paying higher taxes. On the other hand, if you're making more than $100,000 and certainly if you're making more than $200 to $250,000, then you're doing pretty well...

This is the kind of rhetoric that killed Walter Mondale's 1984 presidential campaign and will make it very difficult for any Democratic president to get through a general election, even now.

On the other hand, pro-environment, pro-choice, progressive voters have nowhere else to go. Senator McCain won't clobber them financially, but he's hardly supportive of a progressive or even mainstream agenda on social issues. Sounds like write-in time. Or a ripe environment for a third-party challenge.

Tags: presidential election 2008 | small business | social security | taxes | Barack Obama

Tools: Share | | Comments (3)

Reader Comments

What a fool

Good Lord, Barack Obama is stupid to the point of absurd. Raising taxes on the class that contributes the most to the economy? Why in the world would he do that? Is he deliberately trying to kill this country?

God, please protect this great nation from Barack Obama. Amen.

reality check

"She earns $200,000 per year... She's probably living paycheck to paycheck."

If she's making 200k and she's living paycheck-to-paycheck, then she needs to re-examine her fiscal habits.

According to the 2006 census, the household you're describing is part of the top 5% of the household incomes in the U.S.

Obama - "certainly if you're making more than $200 to $250,000, then you're doing pretty well..."

The top 5%? I'd say so.

reality check

"She earns $200,000 per year... She's probably living paycheck to paycheck."

If she's making 200k and she's living paycheck-to-paycheck, then she needs to re-examine her fiscal habits.

According to the 2006 census, the household you're describing is part of the top 5% of the household incomes in the U.S.

Obama - "certainly if you're making more than $200 to $250,000, then you're doing pretty well..."

The top 5%? I'd say so.

Note he said CEO's - not self-employed salespeople.

Here - from the Toldeo Blade - some figures for some CEO's for just that area:

_____________

The top five officers at Manor Care Inc., the nation's largest nursing home operator, collected total compensation last year of $35 million.

At Owens Corning, also a downtown Toledo firm, the package was nearly $19 million. At Owens-Illinois Inc., it was $8 million for six executives; at Health Care REIT Inc., $7.5 million for the top five; and at Cedar Fair LP, $7.4 million for five officials.

The 10 highest-paid executives of all Toledo area companies with public stock was $58 million, or $1 million more than the government estimates as the income for all 2,800 people in the Elmore vicinity.

At OC, which makes roofing shingles and building insulation, Chief Executive Officer Dave Brown drew the area's second-highest compensation last year, $7.4 million, up 8 percent from the year before.

Company spokesman Jason Saragian said only 80 to 90 percent of the pay is related to performance of the firm, where sales were up 11 percent to a record $6.3 billion last year and operating income jumped 22 percent.

Top paid locally, based on company filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, was Manor Care CEO Paul Ormond, with $17.1 million in compensation, of which $9.7 million was exercise of stock options.

___________________________

I'd say those folks can afford to pay a little more into SS. really.

Add your thoughts

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie ErbeBonnie Erbe has covered Washington politics since God was a baby. Because of that, and the fact that she's a native New Yorker, nothing much surprises her anymore. She has covered Congress, the Supreme Court, the Justice Department, and occasionally the White House for radio and television networks. She also hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe, and writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service. To the Contrary will allow you to lift the curtain of partisanship for a refreshingly non-partisan perspective on politics, the environment, religion, and issues that affect the lives of women, families, and communities of color.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.