Sunday, November 8, 2009

Opinion

Studies Should Separate Out Career-Oriented Women

April 07, 2008 03:32 PM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link | Print

Will they ever stop? The studies, I mean—studies showing no matter how far women advance on the equity scale, we're still as a gender more domestic and less career oriented than men.

The latest version was released by University of Michigan researchers late last week:

"Having a husband creates an extra seven hours of housework each week for women, according to a new study. For men, tying the knot saves an hour of weekly chores."

Translation: Once married, women are either forced to or choose to pick up the lion's share (not the lioness's share) of housework.

Here's an earlier version, issued last summer by the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics:

"On an average day in 2006, 84 percent of women and 64 percent of men spent some time doing household activities, such as housework, cooking, lawn care, or financial and other household management."

Why are these findings so troublesome? They're probably not troubling to the majority of men. And they may not even trouble some women. But to those of us who thought by now, the lion and the lioness would have reached parity in the lair, the past few years have brought signs that a lot of women do not want these gender fault lines to disappear.

Yes, things have improved since the days of Ozzie & Harriet.

Even the Michigan researchers make note of that:

"Overall, times are changing in the American home. In 1976, women busied themselves with 26 weekly hours of sweeping-and-dusting work, compared with 17 hours in 2005. Men are pitching in more, more than doubling their housework hours from six in 1976 to 13 in 2005."

But that does not erase the fact that there will always be women who want to be full-time homemakers with little or no desire to achieve outside the home. And that's fine. It's what choice is all about.

The problem arises when career women are tagged by dubious employers and stereotyped as someone who "is only working until she gets married" or "until she has a second child."

Career-oriented men have somehow managed not to be similarly "tagged." Not all men want to be CEOs. Not all men want to put in 80 hours per week to make partner. Yet that fact never redounds to the detriment of those who do want to get to the top of the corporate or career ladder.

The future for women, I believe, is not in seeking housework parity. I cannot tell you the number of times I've chastised female friends for doing too much housework or child care. The response is always the same: "There's no way my husband would share equally in this." There is a way, but many women seem disinclined to force the issue. The more domestic work women do, the less time they have for work outside the home.

The future, I believe, is in successfully separating out career-oriented from non-career-oriented women in much the way men have done successfully without even trying.

Tags: Bureau of Labor Statistics | careers | University of Michigan | working women

Tools: Share | | Comments (1) | Print

Reader Comments

All Any Woman Can Do About It

There's no way you can force anybody to do anything they don't want to at home (whether you are a woman or a man). The only thing an over burdened woman can do is quit doing it; let the house go to the dogs; and walk out the door to go to work. Does that seem drastic? Sometimes drastic measures must be taken. It's a showdown and if a woman gives in, she gives into an unfair labor burden for the duration.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Voters' Top Priority: The Economy

Obama Democrats should stop rushing healthcare reform and address more important issues.

H1N1 Vaccine for Wall Street?

Another example of what's wrong with government run healthcare.

Healthcare Vote Delays a Bad Sign for Dems

Expect more waiting, and arm twisting, as vulnerable reps take the hint from voters.

Americans Want Jobs, Not Healthcare Reform

As the unemployment rate reaches double digits, the public makes its preference known.

California Candidates' Poor Voting Record

Couldn't Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have put a note in their BlackBerrys about voting?

Pelosi Cracks the Whip on Moderates

She's using fear of payback to push middle-of-the-road Democrats to vote for the House bill.

A Dollar a Day to Keep the Babies Away

North Carolina program aiding at-risk kids needs to go nationwide.

The New V Takes Swipes at Both Sides

Are they sniping at Obama? Sure? Bush too.

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.