Saturday, November 22, 2008

Opinion

Hillary and 'Maternal Profiling'

October 17, 2007 02:21 PM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link | Print

Sen. Hillary Clinton was campaigning in New Hampshire yesterday and her way-ahead-of-the-pack status (I won't use the word "front-runner") must be giving her the confidence to return to her roots and stump for the women's vote. Up until now, with her support for the Iraq war and tough talk on international issues, she has seemed more focused on convincing male voters she'd make a worthy commander in chief than convincing women voters she'd make a fine president.

The National Organization for Women sent an E-mail cheering on Clinton's commitment, in New Hampshire, to tackle so-called maternal profiling. Such profiling occurs when companies that are considering hiring or promoting young, married workers or employees with sick, elderly relatives presume that these workers, if they're women, won't put in as much time or energy as others because of their family responsibilities.

NOW President Kim Gandy says, "Such assumptions are deeply ingrained in stereotypes about women as caregivers, and they affect the pay and employment status of millions of women, and some men as well. ... This is discrimination, pure and simple, and it contributes to the enormous wage gap between mothers and nonmothers."

According to the Center for Worklife Law at the University of California's Hastings College of Law, in the year 2005, there were more than 600 cases brought by women in academe charging their employers with "family responsibilities discrimination."

This is just in academe. Imagine how many there must have been in corporations nationwide. Stereotyping of any sort is wrong and it's illegal. But some women contribute to it on rare occasion by taking advantage of corporate benefits. I know of several cases in which women took long paid or unpaid maternity leave, only to quit as soon as the leave was up, in order to keep their salaries or benefits for longer periods. We've got to reach a middle ground where companies do not stereotype female or male workers, but workers also don't abuse corporate benefits.

Tags: presidential election 2008 | Hillary Clinton | working women

Tools: Share | | Comments (0) | Print

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

Thomas Jefferson St.

A Down Market Means Low Oil Prices

The upside of a down market

Secretary of State Clinton, But Who's 2?

Who fills out her staff?

Hey, Newt: Tax Credits Are Not Welfare

The GOP liked tax credits, until they lost welfare as a political issue.

Are Voters Turning on Democrats?

Some polls show voters are less likely to vote for Martin if it would get Democrats to 60 in Senate.

State or Senate: What Should Hillary Do?

I hope she stays, but I think she'll go.

When the Dead Stay

A not-quite-ghost story.

Pritzker's Out, Napolitano Still In

The number of potential female cabinet appointees drops from three to two.

Sexism Still Plays a Role in Politics

Jeanne Shaheen’s ascension to the U.S. Senate is historic, but gender still plays a role in politics.

Public Opinion

Will Hillary Accept the State Secretary Post?

Reports suggest that Obama will nominate her. Will she accept?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.