"Un-American" Surgery Abroad
I noted in my story on medical travel online and in this week's issue of U.S. News that more Americans are boarding flights to have bypasses, joint replacements, and other needed procedures performed at hospitals in India, Thailand, and other far-flung destinations. How many, as I also wrote, is several notches below uncertain. Figures as high as 500,000 U.S. patients per year have been tossed around.
Yesterday at a major medical travel conference in Las Vegas, consultant McKinsey & Co. reported that the number is more like 60,000 to 85,000. That's more like travel writer Josef Woodman's rough guess of 50,000, which appeared in my article.
The McKinsey report might deflate a few hospitals' claims. While Thailand's Bumrungrad Hospital, an excellent facility in Bangkok, had reported that more than 35,000 Americans came to the hospital for surgery in 2007, administrators there conceded to me last week that the real figure is about 10,000.The higher number was derived by including expatriates—and by counting every time a patient walked through the door. (A patient who comes for a preop study, then is admitted for surgery, and after discharge returns for physical therapy would count three times.)
Meantime, toward the end of a radio interview I had Sunday about having serious surgery abroad, the interviewer posed a question. Did I think it might be considered unpatriotic or un-American to go outside the country for care? "Unpatriotic?" I said, caught offguard. "In all of the talk and articles, I've never seen any suggestion of that. How is it unpatriotic to find care that's affordable?"
The question seemed strange. Why should someone with bad hips or a bad heart and no health coverage—the sort of person fueling the foreign-surgery trend—be criticized for seeking care at a perfectly good hospital 10,000 miles away at a quarter or a fifth of the price a U.S. hospital would charge? To suffer is patriotic?
"I am back walking normally," wrote a Florida woman in an online comment to my story, "which was a dream for me." She had both knees replaced in India, where the total cost averages less than $20,000 for bilateral replacement. In the United States, typical hospital charges would have been above $85,000. Few people can pay such a sum out of pocket.
The radio interviewer backed off. It is our health system that might be considered un-American, he said, by leaving millions of people vulnerable and in poor health. Hmm. Do we even have a "health system"? Most experts I know think we have a tottering, wheezing Rube Goldberg contrivance. Hospitals are part of its gimcrackery. They could make a tidy profit if they opened the doors to self-payers and charged them half as much as they are now told they will have to pay. Operating rooms in India and Thailand are filling up because that isn't happening.
Tags: hospitals | surgery | travel
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (6)
Reader Comments
The numbers ...
How many medical tourists there are, as McKinsey and Josef Woodman both acknowledge, depends on how you define "medical tourist."
If you count people living in the United States who go to Mexico for health, dental and other care, the numbers they cite swell by at least some hundreds of thousands.
I am not sure why some people want to stipulate that in order to be classified as a medical tourist, one has to get on an airplane.
Jeff Schult
Author, Beauty from Afar: A Medical Tourist's Guide to Affordable and Quality Cosmetic Care Outside the U.S.
The numbers...
McKinsey's medical tourist report, which I just received yesterday, excluded those "who travel in largely contguous geographies to the closest available care (e.g. Mexican facility near a U.S. border city) for they don't consider other medical-travel destination and the financial burden is minimal". You are correct, however; If they were to count these "travelers" the numbers would undoubtedly rise but it is not medical travel in the conventional sense.
In any event, the report clearly indicates those who have sought medical care abroad have exceedingly high levels of satisfaction with the care they received, they would willingly pursue this option again, if necessary, and would recommend to others that they pursue this option.
Overall, I found the study to be very positive and optimistic in its analysis of the medical travel or as I refer to it, the global healthcare market.
WASHINGTON IS THE ENEMY!
It is called competition. We are losing the battle. I don't pretend to know much about the many reasns. It is not just Medical Tourists. I have read that we can't compete because Corporate taxes are the second highest in the World.
Washington would rather collect taxes, then rebate some of that money to prime the pump which those taxes have destroyed.
Harriet Wilkes is right. Our so-called health care system ixists to separate us from our money. The same can be said about the IRS.
If the polititions were not a bunch of wimps, we might be able to have tax reform which might just solve the whole problem.
Bumrungrad Hospital-Bangkok
Colonoscopy-less than $400.00 total
Head to physical including lab, ekg, etc.-less than $500.00 results in hours not weeks
MRI-less than $300.00 total
Excellent care, an appointment in 17 minutes with one of over 900 doctors in every specialty.
Medical Tourism Convention
The Medical Tourism Association puts on an annual convention each year in San Francisco, September 9-12th , www.medicaltourismcongress.com
Jonathan
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our comment guidelines.advertisement

U.S. News's Avery Comarow has been editor of the America's Best Hospitals annual rankings since their debut in 1990. In his reporting on all aspects of clinical medicine from the latest cholesterol guidelines to robotic surgery, he has kept one question in the front of his mind: What does this mean to patients? That perspective uniquely qualifies him to observe and comment on the efforts by hospitals and other healthcare providers to improve care and patient safety.
High Costs at Hospitals
I lady I know had one-day rectal surgery at our small local hospital and was home in 24 hours. Her bill was $11,000, and that didn't count the doctor, anesthesiologist, or the radiologist. Tack on another $4500 for that.
Yes, our health care system is out of whack. It's a system to separate you from your money.
May 06, 2008 16:23:02 PM [permalink] [report comment]