Saturday, July 11, 2009

Money & Business

Capital Commerce

The 10 Dopiest Business and Economy Leaders of 2008

December 16, 2008 12:36 PM ET | James Pethokoukis | Permanent Link | Print

¡Ay, caramba! In a year when Wall Street imploded, the Big Three automakers neared collapse, and the economy plunged into its worst downturn in at least a generation, finding business and economy "leaders" who messed up badly isn't too hard. But these 10 might well be the worst of the worst.

1) Bernard Madoff. If the federal government's accusations prove correct, Madoff also belongs on a list of America's most active and energetic senior citizens. The 70-year-old money manager was arrested by the FBI for allegedly running the largest Ponzi scheme this side of Social Security, losing an estimated $50 billion in client money. Investigators say Madoff told them that his business was just "one big lie." Terrible news for numerous wealthy individuals, banks, and charitable foundations. A perfect way to cap off a perfectly terrible year on Wall Street.

2) The bailout trio. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and New York Federal Reserve President Timothy Geithner decided to let Lehman Brothers fail in September, triggering a global collapse of financial confidence, as well as wrecking the money and commercial paper markets. The move also led to massive hedge fund redemptions, which forced them to liquidate stocks. And don't forget the ever evolving $700 billion Paulson plan to bail out the banks. Buying assets one day, injecting capital the next. And the crisis rolls on ....

3) Alan Greenspan. Now when people call Greenspan "the Maestro," it's with more than a hint of sarcasm. Many economists and financial analysts give the former Federal Reserve chairman a large share of the blame for the current financial crisis by keeping interest rates too low for too long during the first part of this decade. They also say the Ayn Rand disciple shirked his responsibility to ensure the safety and soundness of the financial system by resisting calls for tighter regulation of risky bank lending.

4) Angelo Mozilo. The nattily dressed former CEO of Countrywide Financial has become the tanned face of the subprime mortgage meltdown. Mozilo built Countrywide into the nation's largest mortgage lender and enriched himself to the tune of more than $400 million in the process. But as it turns out, lots of those borrowers should have stayed renters. Not that it mattered to Countrywide, since it could sell those soon-to-be-toxic mortgages to Wall Street and beyond.

5) Robert Rubin. It has been a bad run for the heroes of the 1990s boom. Now it's Rubin's turn for criticism, thanks to the unfolding financial disaster that is Citigroup. It looks as if all the company got from Rubin for some $115 million was a strategy for taking on heaps more risk in the collapsing debt markets. The former treasury secretary probably doesn't have to worry about deciding whether to give up his fat private-sector compensation package if eventually nominated by Barack Obama to be the next Fed chair. Doesn't look as if that call will be coming.

6) Richard Fuld. Not only did CEO Fuld watch Lehman Brothers, the 158-year-old investment bank, go down the tubes, but he reportedly got punched in the face in the company gym and was viciously mocked on Saturday Night Live. Under Fuld, Lehman became the single biggest Wall Street underwriter of mortgage debt right into the teeth of the mortgage debt collapse. But in the end, there was no lifeline from Uncle Sam. That was the knockout blow and worse than a punch in the kisser.

7) Barney Frank. This is a quote, from 2003, that the Massachusetts Democrat would like to have back: "These two entities—Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.'' Turns out that the two government-sponsored entities were walking farther and farther out onto thin financial ice. And as late as last year, Frank wanted Fannie and Freddie to take on even more subprime risk. Washington and Wall Street have to share the blame for the financial crisis.

8) John McCain. At times during the presidential campaign, it seemed as if McCain was going out of his way to prove to voters that he really meant it when he said he didn't understand economics too well. He constantly misspoke about the details of his healthcare plan, let Barack Obama steal the tax-cut issue, and talked more passionately about earmarks than about dealing with the imploding housing market.

9) Barack Obama. If there is one piece of policy advice that economists agree on, it is this: You don't raise taxes during an economic downturn. Doing so would be right out of the Great Depression playbook. Yet even as the economy obviously weakened in the latter half of the year, Obama stuck to his campaign pledge to reverse the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts on income and capital gains for wealthier Americans. Indeed, Obama's transition website still holds out that possibility. And while there are signs that he might instead let the tax cuts expire at the end of 2010, that is not for sure yet.

10) Big Three CEOs and unions. It takes a special kind of incompetence to completely drain away the goodwill of a car-crazy nation like America. Yet polls show that most Americans don't want to bail out the automakers. As with the credit crisis, there is plenty of blame to go around, from poorly designed cars to fat union benefits and complicated work rules. Bottom line: Thousands of workers seem destined for the unemployment line.

Tags: Barack Obama | Wall Street | Alan Greenspan | Barney Frank | Bernard Madoff

Tools: Share | | Comments (34) | Print

Reader Comments

This is why EDUCATION is important.

Most Americans have no common sense when it comes to finances. Why is this? Is it a lack of will to learn, or confusion in what would be logical? Maybe it's that they are being told the wrong things... Maybe it boils down to laziness and that's that.

Many people KNEW they were buying a home they couldn't afford, but still blame the broker for telling them that they could. Are we really that ignorant to our habits? Is mass consumption really supposed to be a, "way of life?"

I, for one, am a minimalist. If I have lived without it, then I don't actually NEED it. Is the word, "Recycle," such a dirty one? Does everything really have to be brand new??

Why are people so against putting their back into an honest days work? It's what will be needed to get us back to where we should be. Rather than outsourcing all of our labor to other countries (ahem, China).

Welcome to Survivor: Real Life. Turn off your TV's and go plant a garden. Do yourself a favor and save yourself some expenses by DOING IT YOURSELF. This concludes my discombobulated rant.

Blame yourselves first folks

Anybody can blame someone else. But did you overbuy? Who did you vote for and why? There's plenty of blame to go around. No funding for agencies that are supposed to be watchdogs, a Treasury Security that was CEO of Goldman Sachs and has no idea how he's spending TARP monies, a President that seemed to be on vacation constantly, a Vice President who could shoot straight only when a friend of his showed him his butt, and the list could go on forever and ever. But the real blame follows:

All of us. We were (or at least most of us anyway) greedy. A lot of us overbought homes, others took out mortgages they knew they couldn't afford or flat falsified information about themselves and then the time came to pay the piper. But like a shoemakers children, we were the last to get shoes, or at the very least a little common sense about money.

It took $4+ gas, food prices that rose weekly, fools making money off the backs of everyone except themselves, and the great unwashed, the people of the United States.

No one complained when times were good and now the griping and blaming is going to last for another year or so, when things will naturally get better.

For those of you complaining, did you save any money? And I'm talking about the minimum three months of living expenses (barebones) that should have been there? Did you put 20 percent down when you bought a home? Did you take out a mortgage you couldn't afford because of course housing prices were always going up?

As just a good old 61-year old Bubba from South Carolina, I saw this coming and practiced good money management. I didn't live off credit, saved as much as was reasonable to have a decent standard of living, knew a con when I saw one. And the years of one percent interest, which we have now or lower, got us into the mess. Blame Greenspan, Bush, Frank, Dodd, whomever you want to but look into the mirror at yourself. You have just as much blame as the rest.

I take my share of the blame. Will you?

Blame yourselves first folks

Anybody can blame someone else. But did you overbuy? Who did you vote for and why? There's plenty of blame to go around. No funding for agencies that are supposed to be watchdogs, a Treasury Security that was CEO of Goldman Sachs and has no idea how he's spending TARP monies, a President that seemed to be on vacation constantly, a Vice President who could shoot straight only when a friend of his showed him his butt, and the list could go on forever and ever. But the real blame follows:

All of us. We were (or at least most of us anyway) greedy. A lot of us overbought homes, others took out mortgages they knew they couldn't afford or flat falsified information about themselves and then the time came to pay the piper. But like a shoemakers children, we were the last to get shoes, or at the very least a little common sense about money.

It took $4+ gas, food prices that rose weekly, fools making money off the backs of everyone except themselves, and the great unwashed, the people of the United States.

No one complained when times were good and now the griping and blaming is going to last for another year or so, when things will naturally get better.

For those of you complaining, did you save any money? And I'm talking about the minimum three months of living expenses (barebones) that should have been there? Did you put 20 percent down when you bought a home? Did you take out a mortgage you couldn't afford because of course housing prices were always going up?

As just a good old 61-year old Bubba from South Carolina, I saw this coming and practiced good money management. I didn't live off credit, saved as much as was reasonable to have a decent standard of living, knew a con when I saw one. And the years of one percent interest, which we have now or lower, got us into the mess. Blame Greenspan, Bush, Frank, Dodd, whomever you want to but look into the mirror at yourself. You have just as much blame as the rest.

I take my share of the blame. Will you?

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

About the Capital Commerce Blog

Send an E-mail to mbandyk@usnews.com.

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital. Reach him by email at mbandyk@usnews.com.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.


Job search powered by Simply Hired

People who read this also read ...

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.