Monday, July 6, 2009

Money & Business

Capital Commerce

Obama Plans a Massive Hike in Social Security Taxes

June 13, 2008 03:09 PM ET | James Pethokoukis | Permanent Link | Print

Barack Obama just found an extra $600 billion or so (over 10 years). He said today in Columbus, Ohio, that he wants to lift the income cap on Social Security taxes for folks making $250,000 a year or more. Here is a bit from his prepared speech:

Right now, the Social Security payroll tax is capped. That means most middle-class families pay this tax on every dime they make, while millionaires and billionaires are only paying it on a very small percentage of their income. That's why I think the best way forward is to adjust the cap on the payroll tax so that people like me pay a little bit more and people in need are protected. That way we can extend the promise of Social Security without shifting the burden onto seniors. And we should exempt anyone making under $250,000 from this increase so that the change doesn't burden middle-class Americans. This means that 97 percent of Americans will see absolutely no change in their taxes under my plan—97 percent.

Social Security guru Andrew Biggs over at the American Enterprise Institute has a run on a computer model a plan similar to Obama's. (Biggs extended the "donut hole" only to earners making up to $200,000.) Here is what he found (bold is mine):

Given the scale of the tax rate increases—a 12.4 percentage point increase in tax rates for the highest earners—it is striking how little Obama's plan would accomplish. The GEMINI model estimates that Obama's plan eliminates only around 43 percent of Social Security's 75-year shortfall. Even after the plan's implementation, Social Security would face a 75-year shortfall of around 1.12 percent of payroll. . . . [The] Obama plan's modest improvements to Social Security's financing come at a steep cost: top marginal federal tax rates inclusive of federal income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes would increase from 37.9 percent to 50.3 percent... . Put another way, the Obama proposal is equivalent to repealing the Bush administration's reductions in top income tax rates from 39.6 percent to 35 percent almost three times over.

 

And here are the 10 states that would get hit the hardest by the Obama plan. (Data courtesy of the Tax Foundation and TaxProf Blog):

1. New Jersey (10.7 percent of the state's workers would see their payroll taxes increase.)

2. Maryland (9.6 percent)

3. Connecticut (9.5 percent)

4. Virginia (9.0 percent)

5. Massachusetts (8.9 percent)

6. California (8.8 percent)

7. New York (8.0 percent)

8. Illinois (7.02 percent)

9. Colorado (6.96 percent)

10. New Hampshire (6.8 percent)

Tags: social security | taxes | Barack Obama

Tools: Share | | Comments (72) | Print

Reader Comments

Get over it..Obama is the President now!!!

you are not a first generation american!!! But honestly people Obama is president...get used to it the same way we working class people had to when Bush was president. No one is stealing your money or attempting socialism or communism..these are all tactics of the republicans to scare others, but really people get used to it. If obama wants it done then it will be done!! Bottom line!!! Also to a comment from before who said people who dont work hard should not get government handouts...everyone that does not make 250,000 a year are not lazy. their are things in this world called racism, sexism, etc. that stop people from advancing as far as "you have". i think people have come to mistake capitalism for selfishness which is not what it is. you work and make your own money...its not like we are splitting your check with joe over here..youo are simply being taxed at the same degree as those who are less fortunate than you.

Re: Your Argument is Ridiculous

Mr. David,

I understand that you have an opinion, and that you feel like you are being "cheated" by the government. But, i believe that as an American citizen, it is only right to give respect to your Commander In Chief. I have always been taught that once a leader has been appointed over you, you must respect them even if you have differing opinions on a subject. This does not mean that you should not voice your opinions, our freedoms [including the freedoms of speech and press] are protected by the Constitution. I am just pleading for more respect towards our elected official. Mr. Daniel David will probably never read this statement but it should serve as a constant reminder to all those who do stumble upon it, that we should set an example for the younger ones and always show respect towards our leaders.

a High SchooL Student

Social Security increase for the rich.

This is a great idea. I also am concerned about seniors who only recieve benefits from their spouse when a death occurs. After paying in social security taxes the surviing spouse is unable to collect what they have paid. The expenses are almost the same as far as living expenses go and in this economy it is getting harder and harder to live on a $1000.00 a month.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

About the Capital Commerce Blog

Send an E-mail to mbandyk@usnews.com.

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital. Reach him by email at mbandyk@usnews.com.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.


Job search powered by Simply Hired

People who read this also read ...

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.