Did the White House Rig the Stock Market?
I don't have the storytelling chops of, say, Oliver Stone, but I'll do my best here: Last Thursday, the stock market was deep in the red all day, with the Dow trading down more than 300 points at its nadir because of investor fears about the mortgage credit crisis. Then as the session drew to a close, the stocks staged an amazing comeback. That huge deficit was nearly erased as the market finished with a miniscule 16-point loss for the day. Then on Friday, stocks soared after the Federal Reserve announced a surprise cut in the discount rate.
Now most traders attributed that Thursday comeback to rumors that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke had seen enough and the central bank would take some action the next day. Others around the blogosphere had a different theory—make that "conspiracy theory." The Adventures of Citizen X blog wondered if the comeback was "a result of investors working through their worries (in a couple of hours no less) or government intervention?" The blog at Greenback Consulting, a stock trading firm, was also full of questions:
"All of a sudden, around 2:00 or 3:00 some buyers stepped in and started buying up everything in sight. Before long it was 4:00 and the Dow was in positive territory. Who was the mysterious buyer? Perhaps it was the Plunge Protection Team averting a financial disaster. It looks even more convincing in light of the Fed's actions the following morning. If anyone knew what the feds next move was going to be it would be the Plunge Protection Team. If this group really does exist, it would make me really reluctant to be a long term bear...Every time things get profitably bad (for the bears) some government dudes come in and ruin the party. History makes a pretty convincing circumstantial case for the Plunge Protection Team, but maybe its just a series of coincidences."
Yes, the Plunge Protection Team is real, except its actual name is the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, or PWG. (The nickname comes from an old Washington Post headline.) After the 1987 stock market crash, President Reagan authorized the creation of the PWG—consisting of the Treasury secretary, the Fed chair, and the heads of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, so that top regulators and economic policy chiefs could formally consult with one another in event of a financial crisis as well as prepare a plan of action in case of a financial markets meltdown. For instance, it might advise the president to temporarily close the markets, as happened after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
But maybe Plunge Prevention Team would be a better moniker if you believe those who think the group's mandate goes far beyond acting as an information clearing house and instead actually directs large institutional investors—or maybe even foreign sovereign funds run by cash-rich nations in the Middle East and Asia—to buy stock index futures as a way of propping up the stock market and ending a panic.
Now there's never been any official confirmation of this. But former White House aide George Stephanopoulos has said in the past that the White House and the PWG have the authority to prop up the stock market and probably did so after 9/11. And former Fed governor Robert Heller has suggested that the government should do just such a thing. So maybe the conspiracy theory worked like this: After Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, Bernanke, and the others watched the carnage unfold last Thursday, the word was put out to several selected players to buy index futures with the knowledge that the Fed would cut the next day as sort of financial guarantee.
My take: The people I have talked to in Washington and on Wall Street totally dismiss all this. Says one financial insider: "I haven't heard a single person suggest anything like that until you called me." A longtime White House official also scoffed at the idea, though he did confirm that Paulson has attempted to reinvigorate the PWG with more meetings. But Paulson apparently sees the PWG as more of an economic policy discussion group, not a market manipulation apparatus. So until I hear something more solid, I am writing this off as either cynicism or wishful thinking gone wild.
Tags: economy | Ben Bernanke
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (2)
Reader Comments
I have been watching the tape for 15 to 20 years. I would agreen there is an invisible hand in the market that in the long run will eventually cause another 1929 depression. There are some reasonably priced stock but the majority of stocks are selling for 2 to 3 times what they should be. And that is because of the Fed's monkeying of interest rates.
Is this the way a free market works?
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our comment guidelines.advertisement

The Plunge Protection Team
I'm sure there's some editor at U.S. News wondering why anyone would post to an op-ed piece that's over six months old. Well, after this week's (Mar 3, 2008) heavy handed manipulation, no one is dismissing the so called "invisible hand" anymore.
The PPT is actually not much of a secret. As James noted, the PWG or "WGFM" was created by President Regan after the 1987 market crash. The executive order creating the WGFM is still available through our nation archives, here: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12631.html.
What is secret, is just about everything they do. What, how, when. FOIA requests from the mainstream media as well as at least one presidential candidate have been ignored or side stepped.
What should be important to all of us is that our stock markets are no longer based on financial or economic fundamentals, but are always subject to WGFM "tweaking". You can see it in this week's index moves -- unnatural, almost puppet-like, given the economic news and the ability of investors to rally in such volumes. You'll see it in the future.
It's not all that bad. No one ever wants to see a return to the 1987 crash, or the great crash of 1929. Yet, it should make all of us uneasy investing. The markets will move naturally when they're not moving much. But if the news too good, or too bad, the PPT will move in. Back in the late 1990's a Washington Post article discussed the group's concern over a potential bubble, but decided to do nothing. The result was the dot com boom-bust of 2000. That mistake reportedly won't be repeated. Neither will a bust.
If you're in the market, bet carefully. There's an invisible hand at work. One that isn't necessarily working in your favor.
Jack Heismann
Mar 07, 2008 23:27:20 PM [permalink] [report comment]