Friday, July 10, 2009

Money & Business

Beyond the Barrel

Shell Sees Three Hard Truths for the Future

April 14, 2008 11:34 AM ET | Marianne Lavelle | Permanent Link | Print

Shell, which for 40 years has been writing future scenarios as a way of grappling with the forces shaping its industry, already has gotten a great deal of attention for its latest set—the first time the giant oil company has concluded that there actually is a preferred course. The scenarios are called "Scramble" and "Blueprints," and they suggest that from looking at current global dynamics, nations will either be fighting each other for dwindling resources or will chart a course for international cooperation on energy and climate.

I had an opportunity to talk to Shell's chief economist, Jeremy Bentham, about the scenarios. Although I'll share the bulk of the interview in a later post, I thought it was worth considering what he called the "three hard truths" that underlie both of the future scenarios, as Shell sees it.

The starting point for this part of the discussion was a population-weighted map of the world, much like the one here at Strange Maps. Of course, everyone knows the huge role that the populations of China and India play in the global economy, but Bentham put the energy implications into sharper focus.

"These population giants are entering their most energy-intensive phase of growth," he said. "In their pre-industrialization phase, their economies were growing without using a huge amount of extra energy. But now they're coming into their mobilization and industrialization phase, and their energy use grows very rapidly. And then, at a later point, they go into a more service-oriented phase, and it slows down again."

He pointed out that the United States, although "immensely energy-inefficient compared to other nations," has had slow growth or flat energy use per capita for years.

There are three hard truths growing out of the current situation, Bentham argues:

• "First, there is a surge in energy demand. It's actually created discontinuity in the world energy economy because for decades the growth in the world economy was actually the growth in the advanced economies in their service type of period. So while you needed more energy for each extra bit of economy, you needed smaller and smaller increments. So over time, the amount of extra energy you required was declining, but since the turn of the decade it's been increasing, because world economic growth has a bigger component of these emerging nations."

• "Second, the conventional oil—the easy oil and gas, the accessible oil and gas—will struggle to grow at that pace. This will create the need for additional energy to be developed and for energy efficiency to play an important role in the future."

• "The third hard truth is the environmental stresses are increasing, clearly with that extra population and extra use of energy. Currently, of course, very high on the agenda are climate issues, and we deal with those. There are also water issues, and a whole set of environmental issues. Those are the three hard truths that will play through all of our scenarios."

More on the Shell scenarios to come.

Tags: energy | Shell

Tools: Share | | Comments (2) | Print

Reader Comments

Desire for heightened energy security based on projections & fears of the future drive the energy sector. This also has an impact on the increased energy usage of all economies. The combined effect of this is to spur energy demands beyond realistic requirements thereby initiating a chain of events that spins every claculations out of control. There is a definitve need to redefine the actual usage on a per capita basis and work vigorously to keep demands at sustainable levels. Its not India and China alone that are the major drivers, energy demands have increased exponentially from all quarters of the world.

It would only be prudent for oil companies to develop more efficient ways of tapping this resource as failure to do this today is likely to have a siginificant impact on their own existence in the not so distant future.

Energy Use

A tremendous amount of discussion centers on "how much energy we have/can get. Not a large amount of thought seems to be directed at "How do we use the energy supplies we already have."

I believe that our salvation lies in the greater us of nuclear (and other forms of electrical generation) and its use to power rail service and high speed-short haul passenger service and long line freight service.

In this way we can reduce airline delays, heavy hi way freight and redeploy the "saved" petroleum products to a better use. In this way we can become "energy dependent" through nuclear power. This will require the slaying of a number of "Sacred Cows". I suspect there may not be sufficient intestinal fortitude for the politicians to accomplich this essential task.

The thing to remember is that this would not be a disaster but an Industrial Revolution and an economic boom. With the added benefit of a cleaner environment.

This is a very short version of a complicated subject but is directed at energy utilization rather than development of massive amounts of additional energy supply.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

About This Blog

Marianne Lavelle, senior writer, seeks out the path to an energy future that doesn’t wreck the planet or put you in the poorhouse.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.