Monday, November 23, 2009

Opinion

Michael Barone

Judd Gregg Commerce Nomination Focused Attention on White House Census Strong-Arming

February 12, 2009 05:44 PM ET | Michael Barone | Permanent Link | Print

By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Senator Judd Gregg has withdrawn his nomination for secretary of Commerce. Key passage in his letter: "I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me." Evidently the White House strong-arming on the Census bothered him, and showed that he would not be in command of his department. But his nomination focused attention on the Census, and I think it is going to be more closely watched than it would have been if Gregg had never been nominated. Gregg says he will stay in the Senate but will probably not run for reelection in 2010. If he does run, the fact that Barack Obama nominated him will be a political plus in the New Hampshire.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags: census | Commerce Department | Judd Gregg | Obama administration

Tools: Share | | Comments (12) | Print

Reader Comments

You rabid conspiracy mongers need to GROW UP!

1. Gregg asks Obama (not the other way around) for the appointment as Commerce Secretary almost certainly because among other things, he wanted to be able to fulfill his long-standing desire to water down the census just like GWB did by under-counting minorities, the poor, and the homeless in the first place. He wanted the job in part so that he could strangle the census.

2. Obama grants Gregg his wish, and nominates Gregg for Commerce Secretary.

3. Individuals and groups who are aware of Gregg's contempt for a census that includes everyone -- because that is standard Republican dogma and is something that is anathema to most Republican leaders -- come forth to express their deep concerns about placing a fox in charge of the census chicken coop.

4. When Obama learns from those groups of Gregg's preference for an unfairly limited census -- something Gregg has fought for in the past -- the President agrees to move control of the census out from under Gregg's jurisdiction. Obama does this out his zeal for bipartisanship, because he still wanted Gregg as his Commerce Secretary. MOVING THE CENSUS TO ANOTHER DEPARTMENT WOULD ALLOW OBAMA TO GET HIS NOMINATION APPROVED BY THE SENATE DEMOCRATS WHO WOULD OTHERWISE VOTE AGAINST HIM BASED ON GREGG'S HOSTILITY TO THE CENSUS.

5. When Gregg learns that one key area which he wanted to control -- the census -- is now out of the Commerce Secretary's jurisdiction, he decides he doesn't want the job anymore and so he withdraws his nomination!

There is NOTHING suspicious or nefarious about Obama's bending-over-backwards in order to try to fulfill Gregg's request to be Commerce Secretary -- compromises that were necessary to get Gregg's nomination through the Senate -- but there's a huge amount that is suspicious in Gregg's behavior! He tried to to scam us by taking control of the census, but when he learned that his manipulative ruse failed, he scampered away, defeated.

I was for being in the cabinet before I was against it ...

Continuance of comment from John H of WA (above) Totally agree with John H. This is totally blindsiding an individual, notwithstanding that he is the President of the U.S. What Gregg did was just plain impolite and persons like that should not hold public office.

I have written elsewhere that there are just two sources of power in this world, money and people. When one overpowers the other, chaos reigns, and the chaos various with the imbalance.

Money is always simmering near the surface to overtake reasonableness which exists in people. One important way to obtain this people balance is to have all persons who get work and receive a paycheck from the the public purse should be able to elect their bosses, that is, their manager, and even further their supervisor. These government employees all have a stake in the government; it is their money as much as it is the manager's money. It is not like private industry where it is private money that runs the enterprise. If all employees in government services in our democratic societies did have this franchise then this would have millions of caring people that presently do not exist, mingling amongst the populace. These governmental managers would have to go before their employees each time there is a general election in the governmental jurisdiction, in order to retain their jobs and not return to just an employee status.

Persons like Gregg would be known for how they act with people and likely never attain a supervisory position in government service.

In such a democratic bureaucracy likely and slowly in time these people skills would rub off on the population at large and the society would become more caring and respectful to each other, and we all would become our brothers' keepers.

More on this theme can be found at http://way.to/Education where it is a little more extended, if you care to go there.

I DON'T WANT NOBAMA AND HIS CREW....

I THINK THE WORLD IS BACKWARDS NOW!THE PRES.OBAMA AND HIS CREW AT THE CABINET HAS BEEN A CORRUPT PEOPLE,SO WHY THIS PEOPLE AT THE WHITE HOUSE? THEY ARE GIVING A BAD EXAMPLE TO AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR OTHER PRESIDENTS HAS BEEN A HEROES...WHAT'S WRONG NOW??

THE COMUNISM AND SOCIALISM IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS AMERICAN SOCIETY, NO WAY!!!!

WAKE UP AMERICA!!! THINK THE GOOD PRINCIPLES OF GOD!ETC,ETC,

THE PRES OBAMA HAS STOLE THE ELECTION, WITH THE ACORN AND RAHM EMMANUEL WITH THE CHICAGO CORRUPT MACHINE... AMERICAN PEOPLE WE WANT A VERY AN HONEST PEOPLE,PERIOD!!!

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Colorado May Tax Medical Marijuana

Remember the old saying about how if pot could be taxed, it would become legal?

Healthcare Deals Hurt Middle Class

Lawmakers' votes should not be based on the government equivalent of a bribe.

It's Not About Race, Jesse

With a changing African-American electorate, Jesse Jackson's comments can be overlooked.

GOP Aims at Moderate Dems

Votes in favor of healthcare might hurt more moderate Democrats.

Sarah Palin's a Quitter and a Whiner

A 20-city book tour and an appearance on Oprah hardly qualify as public service.

The President and the Rogue

They're about as far apart as the states that produced them.

Jobs Take Back Seat to Healthcare

Try as she might, Pelosi can't change the subject that fast.

Women Still Need Mammograms

Is this the start of rationing healthcare coverage?

Public Opinion

Should the FCC Regulate Web Fair Play?

The government may step in to prevent traffic-speed shenanigans.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.