Latest Presidential Polls Show a New List of Target States for Obama and McCain
The presidential race seems to be tightening, at least according to the two tracking polls. The Rasmussen tracking poll showed Barack Obama in a statistical tie with John McCain last weekend; the latest numbers show Obama ahead 47 percent to 44 percent. Here is Scott Rasmussen's nut paragraph:
A review of Rasmussen Reports full week tracking confirms the slight tightening of the race. Seven-day tracking shows less volatility than three-day tracking and is based upon interviews with 7,000 Likely Voters each week. For the first five weeks after clinching the Democratic nomination, Obama led McCain 49 percent to 44 percent in every week but one. The sole exception found Obama ahead 49 percent to 43 percent. However, for the seven days ending July 13, Obama leads McCain 47 percent to 45 percent.
The Gallup tracking poll has Obama up 46 percent to 43 percent—almost precisely the same numbers as Rasmussen. The most recent week shows Obama up 46 percent to 43 percent; the week before, Obama was up 47 percent to 43 percent.
It is conventional wisdom that candidates improve their standing by moving to the center, as Obama has done on myriad issues in the past two weeks (for a pungent summary, see Charles Krauthammer's July 4 column). But Obama's movement undermines one of the central premises of his candidacy, that he is not a Washington-style politician, just as his 20-year embrace of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright undermined another central premise, that he is one who seeks to transcend racial barriers. In any case, Obama may have slipped a bit and does not seem to be making significant gains by "refining" his positions.
How could that affect the standings in the 50 states? I took a look at all June and July polls (except for the Zogby Interactive polls, which I'm dubious about) as compiled in www.pollster.com (there were no polls in Delaware, D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Maryland, Vermont, and Wyoming, and I couldn't access the polls for Mississippi, but we don't have any doubts where those 36 electoral votes are going). Those polls (and my inclusion of Delaware, D.C., Hawaii, Maryland, and Vermont) show Obama leading n 26 states and D.C. with 320 electoral votes, and McCain leading (or, in the case of North Dakota, tied) in 24 states with 218 electoral votes.
Some of the results are very much out of line with the results in 2000 and 2004. Obama is carrying New York and New England by double digits, and he has a 20-point lead in California, as well as double-digit leads in Illinois, Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin. He has much narrower leads in the three polls conducted in Colorado, the one conducted in Indiana, the one conducted in Montana, and the three conducted in Virginia, all of which were carried by George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004.
McCain is ahead by double digits in Utah (and probably would be in Idaho and Wyoming, if there were any polls there), Nebraska, and several southern states—Alabama, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.
Most of these polls were conducted in June, when Obama was faring marginally better than he is at present in the two tracking polls. If one assumes McCain is running a little stronger now, in which states would he be overtaking Obama, assuming a uniform rise across the country? In the South, Virginia (13 electoral votes). In the West, Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, and Oregon (24 electoral votes). In the Midwest, Indiana and Ohio (31 electoral votes). In the East, probably nowhere: He trails in June-July polls by 8 percent in Pennsylvania and 9 percent in New Jersey (36 electoral votes). Leaving aside the East, these 68 electoral votes added to his current 218 would give him 286 electoral votes, the number George W. Bush won in 2004.
Conclusion: This has the potential to be a furiously contested race. And on unfamiliar turf. The only 2000 and 2004 target states in the list above were New Mexico and Ohio. The others—Virginia, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, and Indiana—either were not on anybody's target list in 2004 or dropped off one candidate's target list pretty early in the season.
Tags: presidential election 2008 | Barack Obama | John McCain | polls | Rasmussen Report | Gallup
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (108) | Print
Reader Comments
Well, thank goodness.
The LAST thing we need is a two-year, billion-dollar campaign season only to find the electoral college map strangling us into a REPLAY of previous elections where a handful of Diebold-machine states decide everything for us all.
Now, in addition to above, if we could just get church people honest enough to admit to themselves that John and Cindy McCain are beer dealers (and, as a result) NOT being called by God to lead America, most of the rest of the Bible-belt states would go into contention too. But, alas, truth is tough to swallow, and many of them will try hard not to know or notice.
This is a test of the American people
This is a test of the collective intelligence of the American people. After 8 years of Bush it is no secret what Republican leadership brings. Huge investment in tax breaks for the top 5%, large investment in war and regime change overseas...no resources left to address border security,education, healthcare etc.
Obama's leadership and policy positions are precisely what this country needs. OF COURSE we need to get out of iraq. It cost 10 Billion per month. OF COURSE the middle class need a tax cut more than the rich do. Its the middle class that has been squeezed. It would be great to have someone who could think and speak as President. Not someone who is selling their name or family story to be president.
The question that remains is will the American people hold on to racism and thus parrish under 4 more years of Republican rule? Or will they put past divisions behind them and save this country by changing direction under Obama's leadership.
Latest Presidential Polls
I saw my first McCain bumper sticker yesterday in Philadelphia, one of the most Democratic cities in the country. Fittingly, it was on a new Mercedes parked at an expensive hotel, and quickly became an object of derision and ridicule.
Any country whose voters are dumb enough to elect Bush to a second term in 2004, after he had demonstrated to all his staggering imbicility in every field of endeavor, is unquestionably dumb enough to elect McCain in November. Bush won the 2004 election on "fear," a new phenomenon in our country's history. Despite the population's distain of smarts, we were never a fearful nation. Something changed, however, and Republicans won -- and may well win again -- because people vote their fears. (To put the matter in perspective, 9/11, although cataclysmic, had only a fraction of the number of dead civilians on any night during the Second World War.) The American republic may well die, not behind closed doors per se, but simply from fear.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement



