We're Not Leaving Iraq
Sixty years ago this month, the top story in campaign year 1948 was not the big poll lead of Republican nominee Thomas Dewey or the plight of President Harry Truman. It was the Berlin airlift. On June 23, the Soviets cut off land access to West Berlin. Gen. Lucius Clay, the military governor in Germany, called for sending convoys up the autobahns, but Allied troops were vastly outnumbered by the Red Army, and everyone feared it would overrun Western Europe unless the United States retaliated with the atomic bomb. Air Force generals said that there was no way planes could ferry the 8 million pounds of food and coal Berlin would need every day. Secretary of State George Marshall and Joint Chiefs Chairman Omar Bradley, two of America's most respected generals, felt Berlin was indefensible and we should withdraw. One man disagreed. President Harry Truman, in one crucial meeting after another, said, We're not leaving Berlin.
And we didn't. Truman had no idea how Berlin could be supplied. But General Clay persuaded him to order the Air Force to send more planes that it wanted to keep, pristine and at the ready for other missions, at home. Air Force Chief of Staff Hoyt Vandenberg, at the prompting of Gen. Albert Wedemeyer, appointed Gen. William Tunner, who had run the airlift "over the hump" from Burma to China, to run the airlift in Germany. Tunner imposed brute efficiencies so that a plane landed and took off every 90 seconds, and the pilots working under him devised ingenious ways to increase payloads and to gain favor from Berliners by dropping handkerchiefs full of candy to the children lining the runways at Tempelhof Airport.
This tale of American expertise, ingenuity, and generosity is told vividly by Andrei Cherny in his wonderfully readable book The Candy Bombers. Today, we know how it ended: how the airlift supplied West Berlin all winter until the Soviets opened up land access in May, how Truman was re-elected to almost everyone's surprise in November. But Truman couldn't know those things in those first days in June and July. He knew only that we weren't leaving Berlin.
There are lessons aplenty in this story for us today. One is that the kindness of American soldiers—the candy bombers—can be a national asset. There are many similar stories out of Iraq and Afghanistan, even if today's media, unlike the media of 1948, are not disposed to tell them. Another is that presidential determination to avoid defeat and retreat can prevail against the advice of experts. Just as Truman's Pentagon opposed the airlift, so George W. Bush's Pentagon mostly opposed the surge strategy in Iraq. In late 2006 and early 2007, the advice from experts, notably the Baker-Hamilton commission, was the same as that from Marshall and Bradley to Truman—get out with whatever fig leaf you can. The surge, like the airlift, was said to put undue strain on the military, to degrade the readiness of men and materiel for other missions. All these claims were plausible and, in the case of the surge, dominated press coverage and were supported by the incoming leaders in Congress.
Lasting goodwill. But Bush, echoing Truman, said, at least in effect, We're not leaving Iraq. He embraced the proposals for the surge, which had been worked up by retired Gen. Jack Keane and American Enterprise Institute scholar Frederick Kagan. He found a commander, Gen. David Petraeus, who had rewritten the Army's manual on counterinsurgency and who had the character and skill to put the surge into effect. As was the case with General Tunner, the men and women serving under him showed unexpected ingenuity and the ability to adapt to unpredicted turns of events, like the Anbar awakening, which enabled them to convert Iraq's deadliest province into a friendly, peaceful territory. And, I am sure we will find out sooner or later, those troops also performed acts of generosity, which made their task easier and will produce goodwill, as the candy bombings did, that will last for decades to come.
The lessons are clear. Stand fast. Put the right men in charge. And never doubt the capacity of the men and women of the American military, when given the right orders, to perform far better than the experts predict.
Tags: Iraq | Harry S Truman | George W. Bush
Tools:
Share
|
| Comments (29) | Print
Reader Comments
Good story. Off point.
Bush, unlike Truman, is not running again. Iraq is not post-WWII Germany. Our paper authority to be in Iraq is running out and must be negotiated as an agreement to be signed with Iraq.
They want a timetable for our withdrawal. If Iraq stalls on signing (for lack of our timetable) until the end of the year, our stubbornness to stay is going to be seen as recalcitrant occupation for American imperialist (oil) interests, not as our "stated" interests of a free Iraq. A world PR problem.
Unable to acknowledge success.
The constant drum-beat of negativity and an eagerness to foster defeat has become both predictable and boring.
Why do I often need to read foreign press to get updates on the amazing progress being made in Iraq? We’re probably five years away from being able to draw conclusions. Having said that, the very real prospect of having grown Iraq while handing extremes a humiliating defeat should be of great celebration.
I’m humbled by the performance of our soldiers, the soldiers of our allies and the efforts of so many Iraqis under the most difficult conditions. Specifically our military service men and women: Thank you. You are the best among us.
Truman/Bush
I was, and am, a big Bush supporter. However, I think he has made what appear today to be real mistakes. He has been accused of being, at the best, very stubborn. That argument has seemed to have some merit from time to time.
But the final chapter of his place in history has not been written yet. Maybe we will all (maybe not me; I'm 65)find out that his determination to win was the right call also.
But there is no doubt in my mind, and should not be in anyone else's, that our military is the finest in the world, both militarily and humanely. We have had some rogues in these wars, but that's not new either. But by far the vast majority of our individuals are just plain fine people. As a nation, we are just plain fine people also, in spite of the image some would try to foist on us.
I pray that our next president will be so resolute in his leadership of our great country, and that we citizens will be just as resolute in our support of this great country.
Add your thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.advertisement



