Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Opinion

Michael Barone

Environmental Restrictionists Could Use Polar Bears to Get in the Way of Infrastructure Projects

December 22, 2008 04:58 PM ET | Michael Barone | Permanent Link | Print

By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

In his townhall.com column, Hugh Hewitt cites my recent blogpost on Interior Secretary-designate Ken Salazar and raises the question of how Salazar will deal with polar bears. Yes, polar bears. As Hewitt points out in this column and as he has written on his blog at hughhewitt.com, environmental restrictionists want to use the threat that supposed global warming poses to polar bears as the basis of legal suits to stop economic development not just in Alaska but throughout the United States. This sounds outlandish, but it's true. No economic growth because it might raise temperatures in the Arctic, which might in turn reduce the number of ice floes that these attractive carnivores jump on.

As Hewitt has pointed out, polar bear populations have actually been increasing lately. The species is not endangered but thriving. In February 1998, I visited the oil fields in the North Slope of Alaska. It was 40-below zero (don't ask which scale: It's 40 below in both Fahrenheit and Centigrade), and I was being driven around in an all-terrain vehicle on ice roads. The vehicle had been warmed up for three hours, but I could still see my breath inside; the road conditions were such that we couldn't go more than 30 miles an hour. "Wouldn't it be great," I said to the driver, "if we saw a polar bear." "No, it wouldn't," he said. "A polar bear can run faster than this car can go and can punch through the windshield with his paw. And to him, you're lunch."

Democrats say they want major infrastructure projects. The usual argument against them—that they take too long to get up and running to stimulate a recessionary economy—is weak because the current recession threatens to linger and perhaps turn into long-running deflation. But we can't have major infrastructure projects if environmental restrictionists sue and stop them in the name of the polar bear. This is something Democrats, especially Ken Salazar, might want to think about.

Tags: environment | Ken Salazar | animals | endangered species | Department of the Interior | Obama administration

Tools: Share | | Comments (11) | Print

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Islam's Leaders Need to Speak Out

If Islam is a religion of peace, why don't more clerics publicly condemn violence?

Alan Simpson on Guns and Jail for Kids

A bit of context for the Supreme Court hearings.

Congressional Term Limits

The introduced amendment would limit the amount of permanent politicians.

Google's Christmas Gift

Try it for free ... right up until you can’t give it up.

Recess Politics and Healthcare

Pelosi needed her votes before Veterans' Day break.

No More in Afghanistan

Don't stress the Army any more.

Clinton on Bush and the Berlin Wall

Clinton praises the first Bush for two pivotal decisions to keep peace in Berlin.

Men Have Same Workload As Women At Home

Assuming this will give women a fairer shot in the workplace.

Public Opinion

How Can We Best Honor Our Veterans?

How will you remember our nation's veterans?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.