Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Michael Barone

One More Look at New Hampshire

January 10, 2008 04:51 PM ET | Michael Barone | Permanent Link | Print

I have already remarked on the eerie resemblance between the constituencies backing Al Gore 2000/Hillary Clinton 2008 and Bill Bradley 2000/Barack Obama 2008. Now, with the final returns in from New Hampshire, we can compare the 2008 results with those of 2000. Because there are more than 250 cities and towns in New Hampshire, I'll do the comparison by counties, although county lines break up various metro areas. I'm ordering the counties by percentage for Gore in 2000 and showing the Bradley 2000, Clinton 2008, and Obama 2008 percentages and the percentage leads of the Gore/Clinton candidates.

  Gore Bradley   Clinton Obama  
Statewide 49.7 45.6 +4.1 39.1 36.5 +2.6
Coos 57.2 35.3 +21.9 42.3 28.6 +13.7
Strafford 52.2 42.8 +9.4 40.7 34.1 +6.6
Hillsborough 51.7 44.1 +7.6 42.0 34.8 +7.2
Merrimack 50.5 44.9 +5.6 35.9 37.9 -2.0
Rockingham 48.8 45.9 +2.9 42.0 34.7 +7.3
Cheshire 48.4 46.4 +2.0 33.8 39.2 -5.4
Sullivan 48.3 44.3 +4.0 35.8 39.8 -4.0
Belknap 47.5 45.4 +2.1 37.3 37.0 +0.3
Carroll 45.8 49.7 -3.9 34.4 40.1 -5.7
Grafton 39.8 55.4 -15.6 31.7 45.3 -13.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The continuity here is not perfect, but it's a lot higher than you usually see in primaries. It's as if there were two well-established factions in the Democratic Party. It's especially striking, since Democratic turnout in New Hampshire increased by 87 percent between 2000 and 2008, from 154,000 to 287,000.

The good news is that the Gore-Bradley race provides a good benchmark for the Clinton-Obama race. The bad news is that Bradley dropped out of the race after the New Hampshire primary. Under that year's schedule, there was an interval of five weeks—weeks, not days—between New Hampshire and the next contest, and Bradley, despite losing by only 4 points in New Hampshire, could not keep his campaign alive for that period of time. So there are no future contests in which we can forecast the outcome by looking back at the 2000 race.

Tags: candidates | Democrats | primaries | Barack Obama | Hillary Clinton | New Hampshire primaries

Tools: Share | | Comments (0) | Print

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.