Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Michael Barone

Economic Freedom

January 16, 2007 06:00 PM ET | Permanent Link | Print

The Index of Economic Freedom for 2007, sponsored by the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation, is out. Here is Mary Anastasia O'Grady's article in the Journal on it, and here is the Heritage website entry, the data, and the rankings. Only seven countries receive "free" ratings, with a score above 80, and every single one of them is primarily or substantially English-speaking: Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, the United States, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and Ireland. The next nine countries, with scores between 75 and 80, are mostly smaller European countries: Luxembourg, Switzerland, Canada, Chile, Estonia, Denmark, the Netherlands, Iceland, and Finland. Canada, of course, is primarily English-speaking, and my impression is that knowledge and use of English is widespread in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Iceland.

Why are English-speaking countries at the head of this list? Because they–we–are the inheritors of England's traditions of representative government, rule of law, and economic freedom. For more on this, by all means read James Bennett's Anglosphere website.

Thoughts for the Day

Here is my Creators Syndicate column for this week, on the 2007–08 political cycle, and here is Quinnipiac's Peter Brown on the same subject.

Amid the shrieks of rage we have heard in response to George W. Bush's decision to send more troops into Iraq, here are the much cooler analyses of Brookings's Michael O'Hanlon and the Washington Post editorial page.

In my column this week I said that we seem to have entered a period of "open field politics," in which past alignments and allegiances no longer hold. Evidence for this comes from Scott Rasmussen's daily polls on Bush's job rating. Ordinarily Rasmussen's three-day numbers move glacially. But they have gyrated wildly in the past week. Rasmussen had Bush's job approval at 44 percent as of Tuesday night, January 9. The number falls to 39 percent January 10 (when I presume most of the respondents were interviewed before Bush's 9 p.m. speech), 35 percent January 11 and 12, 39 percent January 13, and 41 percent January 14.

I have written recently about the alternative minimum tax. Here blogger (and University of Wisconsin law Prof.) Ann Althouse discusses the AMT, which cost her $4,900 last year, and says, "It's all about living in a blue state."

Tags: income tax | Iraq war (2003-) | politics | Rasmussen Report

Tools: Share | | Comments (1) | Print

Reader Comments

economists increased nations

didn dimming ongoing decade production 1980 intensity

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.