Thursday, November 26, 2009

Opinion

Michael Barone

The Draft

November 21, 2006 12:09 PM ET | Permanent Link | Print

Rep. Charles Rangel, now about to become a member of the majority party again after 12 years, has revived his proposal for a military draft. This is about as absurd a public-policy proposal as I can imagine. Contrary to Rangel's claims–talking points recycled from the Vietnam era, when we did have a draft–military recruits are not drawn predominantly from the lower economic ranks of society. Quite to the contrary, as a recent report from the Heritage Foundation makes clear, military recruits tend to come from above the national economic median. Here's my earlier post about the Heritage report. Moreover, when you take a look at the numbers, there is no need for a draft. In World War II, we were a nation of 130 million that needed a military of approximately 12 million–nearly 1 in 10 of the entire population. Today, we are a nation of 300 million that needs a military of, at most, about 3 million–1 in 100 persons in the entire population.

Here's a blog poll on the draft.

A Belated Note on the Congressional Leadership Elections

I see a common thread in the congressional leadership elections and the victories of Steny Hoyer for House majority leader, Trent Lott for Senate minority whip, John Boehner for House minority leader, and Roy Blunt for House minority whip.

In each case, the relevant electorates–House Democrats, Senate Republicans, House Republicans–chose the candidate with the most leadership experience. Three of their opponents–John Murtha, Lamar Alexander, and Mike Pence–had no leadership experience, and the fourth, John Shadegg, had little experience whipping votes. Other factors were, of course, present in each race. But leadership positions require certain talents that not all able members have, and usually those talents are honed by experience. My hunch is that the experience argument contributed to the large margins for Hoyer, Boehner, and Blunt and played a critical role in Lott's 25-to-24 victory. This thoughtful analysis by Jonathan Martin in National Review Online takes a similar view.

Tools: Share | | Comments (15) | Print

Reader Comments

xanax dosage .25

Beautiful site!

tramadol nrop

Perfect work!

tramadol overdose for dogs

Incredible site!

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.