Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Opinion

Michael Barone

Warren Buffett's philanthropy

June 26, 2006 04:17 PM ET | Permanent Link | Print

The brilliant investor Warren Buffett has decided to leave the vast bulk of his fortune to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Washington Post has the story, unsurprisingly, since both Buffett and Melinda Gates serve on the Post company board of directors. Buffett has long made it clear that he intended to leave his children only a very small percentage of his wealth, more than 99 percent of which is in Berkshire Hathaway stock—some $44 billion currently. (Disclosure: I own one share of Berkshire Hathaway.) The Gates Foundation currently has about $30 billion, donated by the Gateses from their Microsoft stock.

I suppose some people may worry about such a large bloc of capital being held by a single foundation. But from what I have seen and reported on in this blog, the Gateses seem to be extremely thoughtful and creative philanthropists. They're concentrated on world health and U.S. education—both areas in need of serious improvement. Buffett, in contrast, evidently has no great philanthropic projects in mind.

Until now, Buffett has given little to philanthropy, amassing the wealth and leaving the work of philanthropy to others so his money could compound at a higher rate, he told Fortune. He said he had always planned to have his wife oversee his charitable giving after his death. But after she died – and because he saw an opportunity to invest in an existing, well-respected foundation run by two "ungodly bright" people – he changed plans to start giving it away this year, he told the magazine.

His philanthropic strategy seems to mirror his investment strategy: Berkshire Hathaway buys whole businesses and big blocks of shares in public companies in which it has confidence and lets existing management continue to run them. Now he's leaving the bulk of his wealth to be given away by the Gateses.

I remember reading somewhere that Buffett intended to leave all his money to a foundation working for population control. http://www.cirtl.org/buffett.htm That would have been extremely foolish: The dangerous specter before the world now is not overpopulation but underpopulation, as documented in Ben Wattenberg's Fewer: How the New Demography of Depopulation Will Shape Our Future, and Philip Longman's The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do About It. Perhaps these books helped to persuade Buffett to give up on population control, in which case Ben and Phil have a done great service to the world.

I give great credit to Bill and Melinda Gates for taking personal charge of their foundation and not just turning their money over to left-wing foundation apparatchiks but rather thinking creatively about how it should be spent. And I give great credit to Warren Buffett for deciding not to turn his money over to such apparatchiks but to give it to the Gateses to superintend.

Tools: Share | | Comments (3) | Print

Reader Comments

generic adipex phentermine hcl

HAK1Td Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!

phentermine on line pharmacy

IVsPX3 Great site. Good info.

"That would have been extremely foolish"??

Dwindling resources, increasing demand for those resources, and global warming are because of too many people, especially those with high standards of living. Overpopulation is killing this planet, and the faster the population grows the faster the planet will die. Ben and Phil have done a great disservice to the world.

It's human nature, at least in America, to do nothing until a problem hits us square in the face. Once people realize that there are too many people, it will be too late. The time to take action is now; waiting until open spaces are gone, wildlife species have been driven to extinction, natural resources have been depleted beyond repair, and numerous other negative consequences of human overpopulation have occurred, it will be too late to do anything about it.

To say that the world is in trouble due to underpopulation is so far from the truth that I am amazed that someone of Michael Barone's intelligence would actually write such a statement. Incredibly irresponsible.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Alan Simpson on Guns and Jail for Kids

A bit of context for the Supreme Court hearings.

Congressional Term Limits

The introduced amendment would limit the amount of permanent politicians.

Google's Christmas Gift

Try it for free ... right up until you can’t give it up.

Recess Politics and Healthcare

Pelosi needed her votes before Veterans' Day break.

No More in Afghanistan

Don't stress the Army any more.

Clinton on Bush and the Berlin Wall

Clinton praises the first Bush for two pivotal decisions to keep peace in Berlin.

Men Have Same Workload As Women At Home

Assuming this will give women a fairer shot in the workplace.

Voters' Top Priority: The Economy

Obama Democrats should stop rushing healthcare reform and address more important issues.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.