Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Mortimer B. Zuckerman

Obama's Economic Hope Teeters at the Edge of a Chasm of Public Fear

Posted April 20, 2009
Mort Zuckerman
Mort Zuckerman

First, we have the difficult task of saving and reconstructing a financial system in an atmosphere of resentment and deep distrust. The same financiers who preached the necessity of free markets on the way up have come to the public trough to be saved at a cost that will be in the trillions of dollars. Who can blame the average American taxpayer (who earns under $50,000 a year), who has to cope with broken hopes and diminished aspirations, not to speak of shattered expectations of a secure retirement, for becoming angry when he is asked to rescue institutions responsible for the chaos? When forced to fill the begging bowls of financial wizards, who then receive bonuses? But the institutional problems we face will not go away because we are enraged by the malefactors. The inescapable fact is that our financial system is the brains of a market economy that moves money from the people who have it to the people who need it for investment and economic growth.

National economic recovery and Wall Street's health are intertwined. As Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke stated, "History demonstrates conclusively that a modern economy cannot grow if its financial system is not operating effectively." Former GE Chairman Jack Welch put it well when he said, "Healthy banks are to economies as healthy hearts are to people: They keep them alive with the 'lifeblood' of credit." Given our extreme dependency on credit, the patient is in cardiac arrest.

Not that the analogy will be easier to accept once the full scale of our predicament becomes clear. The estimated volume of bad loans that will have to be written off exceeds $2 trillion—and that is before write-offs estimated at $1.5 trillion from auto, credit card, corporate, and commercial real estate loans yet to be taken. Given that the total capital of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. banks is approximately $1.4 trillion, the U.S. banking system is essentially insolvent and may need as much as $2 trillion in new equity to fully resume its role. but we cannot allow the banks to fail. They provide organized, informational capital that understands the credit requirements between a borrower and a lender. Yet today, banks are wary that their capital can't survive most of the worst-case scenarios for the broader economy. This leads them to hoard much of their new capital against future losses rather than use it for loans, since they are unsure how many borrowers will default—or whether there will be more federal money to tap if large numbers do default. Under these circumstances, they simply cannot fulfill the credit-making function once offered by the now discredited securitization markets.

So credit remains very tight, and is even tightening more, in the midst of a harsh recession—the opposite of what is wanted or needed. Private behavior and the lack of confidence are neutralizing public policy. Having once had too little appreciation of risk, lenders now have too much. The willingness of lenders to lend and of borrowers to take on more debt, which is the basis for the creation of credit, is simply not there.

The Fed is basically taking charge of preventing a broad credit collapse. It is finding novel ways to lend to banks and guarantee their assets because the old ways are not working. It has cut the federal funds rate to 1 percent; it has increased dollar loans called "swaps" to other governments; it has made loans and provided credit in the billions and trillions of dollars to prop up financial institutions that may be too big to fail because their collapse would pose a systemic risk to our financial structure.

Understandably, the spectacle of huge amounts of taxpayer money being provided to these very institutions that contributed so much to our current financial difficulties has added to public distrust. The American people don't believe that taxpayer money is being used in ways that will benefit them. They are focused on one main thing: whether the economic measures sponsored by the new administration will halt and reverse job losses and stabilize home prices.

  • Print  |
  • Subscribe  |
  • |
  • |
  • Sphere: Related Content

Reader Comments

Rich

The analysis of how we got here is mostly correct but the read of public sentiment is wrong--the very high approval numbers that Obama continues to get despite public furors such as the stimulus bill and the "teaparties" shows that the public is not drowning in pessimism; they believe Obama and his administration are handling it and that their lives will start to improve by the end of this year. Zuckerman's heroic picture of the banks and capitalism may be mostly wrong--the big cash movements created by their machinations produced a bubble which, when it burst, stripped all the beneficiaries--from upper-middle class salarymen to overextended homeowners with a credit card--of their artificial gains. What is left is the "real" economy, the businesses and occasional factories and local banks, doing what they've always done. America desperately needs to become a steady-state economy along the lines of the European social democracies, where public and private need have a reliable balance, so that we can stop obsessing and arguing about the phony economic thought behind cowboy capitalism and instead be able to focus on life's important matters, like going to mars or creating intelligent machines or curing disease...

Josh of NY

Josh of NY: "An average taxpyaer making $50,000 pays only 3% in federal taxes.. We are not being bailed out by an average taxpayer but by the same "rich" that this administration so fervently denigrates"

Who's your accountant? I get soaked to the tune of about 30% every year, just in income taxes. We won't even go into fees, sales taxes and all manner of hidden taxes, which would take it northward to about 50% or so. And that was true when I only made $12,000/year, too!

A Spiritual solution to the economic problem?

Could the answer to the economic problem be beyond equations, and formulas and calculated probabilities?

Perhaps we need to grow up, and apply spiritual attributes to our strategies, like economic democracy and social justice.

Perhaps the "invisible hand" helps those who help others.

One strategy that meets the spiritual test is enhanced profitsharing. www.profitsharinguprising.com

Allow businesses a tax credit for returning 20% of net profits back to employees.

This is the next great advancemnt for humankind.

All are invited to join the profitsharing uprising.

This will increase household income quickly and dramatically.

It will refine capitalism to the model that was envisioned by our forefathers.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Crossword Puzzle

Do You Like Crosswords?

We've added a new feature to our weekly digital magazine: an exclusive crossword puzzle!

advertisement

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Mary Kate Cary

Mary Kate Cary

The GOP Should Reach Out to Women

The male-dominated party just doesn't understand what women want.

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman

The Financial System Needs a Careful Cure

Let the Federal Reserve oversee new regulations for finance giants.

Palin Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon on Sarah Palin

We've assembled some of the best editorial cartoons on Sarah Palin. Check them out.

Thomas Jefferson St.

GOP Can Be Thankful for Strong Polls

But they cannot get complacent.

5 Reasons for a Democratic Thanksgiving

Michael Steele and healthcare reform top the list.

Women Have Say on Health Reform

If it's the year of the women, why are there so few of them?

Turkey Tax

Uncle Sam is joining in on your Thanksgiving dinner.

Ideological Labels Just Don't Fit

Hard-liners don't understand that some of us don't toe an ideological line.

A Decade in Biased Review

How well does the video sum up the last decade?

GOPers Push European-Style Litmus Tests

Some RNC members want strict party platforms. Why do they hate America?

Your Photos

President Barack Obama speaks about combat troop level reductions in Iraq as he addresses military personnel at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.

Obama in Your Town

Has the president visited your town? Send your photos to obamaphotos@usnews.com, and we'll post our favorites online.

Courtesy Greg Meinert

Thousands cheer as Obama becomes the 44th president.

Your Inauguration Photos

Thanks for sending us such great shots from this historic event.


A baby kissing an Obama poster for Washington Whispers.

Your Campaign Photos

We asked to see your personal election pictures and you delivered.

Public Opinion

Should the GOP Have a Litmus Test?

Should the RNC exclude politicians who don't match the party's platform?

advertisement

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.