Israel, Despite Hamas Rockets and Media Scorn, Must Not Compromise on Peace or Terror
In the interim, Israel must not wait on events. Israel would be wise (despite the risks) to allow even freer movement in the West Bank; it should help to create more jobs and a better standard of living. Yes, the West must press Israel on these issues, but it must also press the Arab states. They should underwrite the training of PA security forces and invest sensibly in housing and agriculture.
Peace will come only when the Palestinians are liberated from their age-old hatred of Israel and Jews. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called for many times, there must be teaching, preaching, and celebrating, from childhood on, that hatred, disrespect, violence, terrorism, anti-Semitism, and war against Israelis and Zionists are unacceptable. Today, it is exactly the opposite.
A great Middle East authority, Prof. Bernard Lewis, recently pointed out in Foreign Affairs how easily the West is misled. In contrast to reports in English, he writes, "the discourse in Arabic—in broadcasts, sermons, speeches, and school textbooks—is far less conciliatory, portraying Israel as an illegitimate invader that must be destroyed." Israel cannot make peace with those whose first priority is to blow up Israeli women and children and who deny the nation's right to exist. As Lewis puts it, "There is no compromise position between existence and nonexistence."
The sad but realistic fact is that we are much closer to the establishment of two Palestinian states, one in the West Bank and one in Gaza, than to reaching a two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians.
Reader Comments
i think Mr. Zuckerman is absolutely correct!
he said it alll. good job Mr. Zuckerman!
kYrSqoEexwihq
lemyaskin rulezz
Media bias claimed my Mr. Zuckerman does not stand the test of systematic analysis!
The information provided at http://www.ifamericansknew.com/media/index.html clearly shows how baseless Mr. Zuckerman's opening paragraphs are. If anything, evidence and analysis indicates clear media bias in favor of Israel.
The rest of the article is similarly based on incorrect information and strange analysis. One points made me smile! Mr.
Zuckerman's Sunni Westbankers and Shii supported Hamas distinction. I take it that everyone knows Palestinians are not Shii but rather Sunni Muslims and Christians. Could it be that Mr. Zuckerman is mixing up Hezbollah of Lebanon and Hamas of Gaza? Both are Muslim organizations. However, Hezbollah is a Shii Muslim movement. Therefore, there really cannot be a strong religious link between Sunni Hamas and Shii Iran.
Thank you Mr. Zuckerman.
advertisement










