Rod Blagojevich Is Not the Political Norm
Neither side is immune
Let's be clear about scandals in government: Neither party is immune from deep embarrassments or far worse. We are always going to have politicians/officeholders from both parties who lie, cheat, or even defame their office and the public trust for money.
The latest sordid example, of course, is Gov. Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, a Democrat who not only appears to be a crook but stupid as well. Because the odor of scandal was already permeating his office, the governor should have known law enforcement folks were on his trail.
Perhaps he was laying the groundwork for an insanity plea when and if his criminal case comes to court. His actions—attempting to sell President-elect Barack Obama's Senate seat—demonstrated an almost deranged man. The tapes of his phone calls and those of his top aide are disgusting.
As my colleague David Broder of the Washington Post wrote last week, this governor has led a charmed life at the ballot box. He won his first term in 2002 because he had more money than two more qualified Democrats, and he won the general election because the GOP itself was mired in scandal. As the incumbent,he won re-election four years later thanks to weak opposition.
The sooner this already infamous governor resigns from office, the better. Illinois has had too many former governors, two Democrats and one Republican, behind prison bars. Not a pretty picture for just one state.
Naturally, a few right-wing Republicans are trying desperately to draw Obama into this web of scandal. There is no evidence to support this claim, but those Republicans seem unwilling to forget that their presidential ticket was soundly defeated last month. Guess they are looking for revenge of sorts.
Part of the reason for the McCain-Palin team losing to Obama-Biden was the scandals in the last eight years during George W. Bush's two terms in office. It may not have been a core issue, but voters have long memories for scandals without being reminded very often.
Let's call the GOP roll in case you've forgotten: Scooter Libby, Jack Abramoff, Duke Cunningham, Bob Ney, Larry Craig, and Ted Stevens, along with a supporting cast of lesser knowns. Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was not charged with any wrongdoing, but he politicized his office so deeply that he left the government a pathetic figure.
Obama's chief of staff, Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel, reportedly made suggestions to the governor but no money was discussed. If it had been, prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald would have certainly made a point of it. Nothing wrong with suggesting names for appointments to vacancies unless sleaze sets in.
The point here is not to minimize Blagojevich's alleged crime of pure greed. In my book, he's a genuine dirtbag for being so brazen in his apparent attempt to sell a Senate seat to the highest bidder. He would deserve prison time and a fine for his actions.
However, those same Republicans should think strongly about further attempts to tie Obama to the governor. In fact, the record so far is that Obama's people seem to have distanced themselves from him.
Unfortunately, these events tend to deepen the cynicism of voters toward all politicians. In my nearly four decades of reporting on politics at the national level, I found nearly all in both parties to be honorable public servants. The bad apples like Blagojevich tend to tar all of them.
- Read more by John W. Mashek.
- Read more about Rod Blagojevich.
Reader Comments
Opinion?
Try using the same standards when writing an opinion piece as you used in your 40 years of reporting the news. Unless of course you want to finally admit, you've been writing opinion all along.
Premature judgment
For decades Mashek provided reliable unbiased reporting. What he does now is write an OPINION piece for USN&WR-he clearly labels it as an opinion piece. So, why expect something else??
Still, He calls Gov. B as the unfolding FACTS appear to indicate: corrupt...yes, despite the fact that he is a Democrat.
And, he calls the Obama connection as facts so far appear to indicate: unlikely involved in the Gov's corruption. Accurate.
What is telling is the radical Right's insistence of guilt for Obama without facts.The rush to label Obama as corrupt says it all: facts don't matter, guilt/innocence don't matter. Investigation doesn't matter-the Right just wants him damned NOW. All based loosely upon guilt by association. Yup, that's how Mccarthy did it and how Nixon did it, and some other notables in history.
There is obviously lots more to come out. Give it a chance to happen. It's too soon to scream cover up, proclaim guilt or anything else-especially in the midst of a wide ranging sensitive Justice dept. investigation. Oh, YES, there IS an investigation happening...well, how about that?
Who among you, if falsely accused, would not want a thorough investigation to uncover the truth? Anyone? Better yet, who among you would not want the whole truth uncovered before being accused? ANYONE? Oh, it's so quiet....
In short, your accusations of guilt are coming too fast, too frequent and too capriciously to be credible. I think there is an old story - something about the little boy who cried wolf....
Skewed Reporting
The main difference between political scandals is in how they are presented. Generally (as is the case in this article) media members tend to revel in reporting scandal from one end of the political spectrum and make excuses for scandals from the other end of the political spectrum. For instance recall the Justice Thomas hearing when the man was accused of jingling keys behind Anita Hill years and maybe even decades post facto. That turned into a media circus in spite of any real evidence or even a particularly serious charge. Compare that to this Illinois issue - instead of even digging into the situation, in order to protect Obama (who may indeed not have been deeply involved) they are lining up to accuse the governor of being "insane." He is the scapegoat.
Obama may indeed be clean, but there are questions to be asked. Why did the Obama camp claim to have had no contact with the governor's office, but also claim to have rejected any offers from the governor? Both cannot be true. The president-elect may not be involved at all, but most media members have a default slant and tend to give some politicians the benefit of the doubt and assume others are guilty until proven innocent (or worse, often guilty by association).
What this author is right about is that there is plenty of scandal to go around from all parties. We don't care about your opinion, Mashek. Why don't you just try objectively reporting the news?
advertisement









