Harold Evans on Israel's Challenges from the United Nations to the J Street Lobby
Harold Evans, editor of the Sunday Times in London from 1967 to 1981, has just published his autobiography, My Paper Chase.
You can now swallow a pill that will painlessly transmit 14 photographs a second for hours from deep within the gastrointestinal tract. It's amazing and great news for the 30 million or so Americans (and millions beyond) who visit a doctor's office with conditions that require this kind of scrutiny. But what is almost as surprising as the innovation is where it came from: a huge missile.
The classic guns-or-butter antithesis was resolved by a former rocket scientist, one Gavriel Iddan, who got the idea from examining the optics technology of a guided missile. He took a chance on setting up a company to explore the idea that everyone told him was out of science fiction—"OK, you can make a tiny camera, but you'll never find a way to cram into a small pill all the light, energy, and gear to transmit a workable image." That's what happens to many innovators; their resilience is as relevant as their brain cells. Iddan persisted. Now his Given Imaging company is on the way to selling a million pill cameras.
Here's another part of the story to invoke reflection. The pill camera didn't originate in Silicon Valley, or Boston or Tokyo, London or Dusseldorf. It came from a tiny country under the constant threat of extermination—Israel. I wrote a book and TV series on American innovation, and I follow the subject. Yet I was stunned to read how much innovative leadership is now coming from Israel. I owe this further education to Dan Senor and Saul Singer, who have combined their talents to write the short but impressive volume Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle.
It's depressing that almost the only news you get about Israel is so determinedly negative. If you asked nearly anyone about Israel, it's a good bet nobody would say, "Oh, yes. What intrigues me about that place is how they manage to have more companies on the Nasdaq technology index than the combination of all the European countries, Korea, Japan, Singapore, India, and China." Indeed, the Senor-Singer book that makes such a point comes out on the heels of two typically negative stories.
First, there was the report just approved by the United Nations General Assembly that singles out Israel for its conduct during the Gaza war earlier this year. The report had been prepared for the U.N.'s Human Rights Council by a commission headed by the South African judge Richard Goldstone. Poor Judge Goldstone now apparently regrets how his report is being portrayed. He should never have accepted leadership of a commission whose terms of reference were designed to excuse the aggressor, Hamas, and punish the defender, Israel. The Human Rights Council's announced decision was to "investigate all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the occupying Power, Israel, against the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory."
The Swiss newspaper Le Temps reports the judge complaining, "This draft resolution saddens me . . . there is not a single phrase [in the U.N. resolution] condemning Hamas as we have done in the report. I hope the council can modify the text." Fat hope. The General Assembly approved a resolution submitted by about 20 members of the Arab League distinguished by a common revulsion for two things: Israel and democratic elections in their own countries.
In signing on for the U.N. mission—with others who had already condemned Israel—it seems to have escaped the judge that Hamas is committed not just to fighting Israeli soldiers but to pursuing genocide plain, simple, and evil. The terms of reference he accepted gave a free pass for the torment of Israeli civilians. Hamas launched thousands of rockets, each one of which was intended to kill as many people as possible, then contemptuously dismissed repeated warnings from Israel to stop or face the consequences. (Ironic, too, that the U.N. vote came as Israel revealed that it had discovered a massive supply of thousands more rockets and other arms hidden among Iranian containers on a ship bound for a Syrian port.)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
"Settlements"
"Like those who do not want their tax money supporting abortion, I also do not like my tax dollars supporting illegal settlements…"
"…I have one question from the point of a US taxpayer. Why does Israel continue building settlements in territory gained from the 1967 war…"
The "settlements" issue is of course only an attempt to divert attention from the core issue of the Arab Israeli conflict which is the total, consistent and persistent refusal of the Arabs, Palestinian and otherwise, to accept Israel's legitimacy and its right to be, to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people.
None of the other issues are at the core, either, e.g. "borders and territory", "natural resources", "refugees" or even "Jerusalem". These issues were not there in 1947 when the UN voted to establish a "Jewish state" and an "Arab state" in the Land, yet the Arabs rejected this UN resolution, 181, and instead initiated the 1947-1949 war aimed, by their own admission, at the annihilation of the tiny Jewish state just proclaimed.
These issues were not there between the years 1948 and 1967 during which time the West Bank, eastern Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip were Jew-free, "cleansed" by their Arab rulers of all the Jews who had resided there, and yet they did not, or even intended to set up their independent state there. Yet, the Arabs initiated the June 1967 Six-Day War against Israel hoping to accomplish what they couldn't in 1947-49: The total elimination of the UN member state of Israel and with it all elements of Jewish civilization of which Israel is its cradle.
To begin to overcome the core predicament the Arab leadership, Palestinian and otherwise, should state clearly, in Arabic, their acceptance of Israel's RIGHT to be, to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people – based on League of Nations decisions, United Nations resolutions and on the universally accepted right of all peoples to national self-determination and independence, including the Jewish people - and back up their newly found conviction with a few simple deeds, actions that would demonstrate their change of heart.
This will bring with it a sea-change of attitude among Jews, within and without Israel, whose nation-state Israel is, ready to take additional risks towards an accommodation of peaceful coexistence between Arab and Jew, between Jewish Israel and its Arab neighbours, something Jews have been eager, very eager to achieve since at least the late 19th century, upon the coming about of the none violent national liberation of the Jewish people, Zionism.
Will the Arabs do so, or will they rather attempt to divert attention from the core issue of the conflict, hoping to bide time and achieve their real goal at some point in the future…??
What Palestine?
First, let me say that I am not Jewish, nor Israeli, nor a fan or suporter of that country. But I do have a college degree, and, to the best of my reading, there never was, nor is a country, or ethnicity called Palestine. This term was coined by the British. Judea is the proper historic term. Palestinians are simply non-Jewish people who live in Israel, period. There is NO legal Palestinian Authority, as there is NO legal Confederate States of America. Muslims, or Arabic Muslims living in Israel are citizens of that UN recognized country. Read L. Uris's book: Haj, which accurately described the recent history of this troubled land. Also, don't forget that the Israeli government GAVE Bethelem, the most sacred Christian site to the so-called Palestinian Muslims, who now oppress the Christians still living there. See Natl. Geographic for the full story. There will NEVER be peace in the Middle East, as long as all parties want to sit in the same chair. We need to step away, and deal with nuclear rogues (Iran, North Korea). Let the Semites hash it out, Amen.
West bank settlements
Like those who do not want their tax money supporting abortion, I also do not like my tax dollers supporting illegal settlements on occupied territory. I hope President Obama makes this clear and stands by it with action.
advertisement









