Conservatives Cautious on Criticizing Sotomayor, Liberals Taunt, 'I Dare Ya!'
Bloggers on Sonia Sotomayor, North Korea, gay marriage in California, and healthcare
Our daily look at stories and topics that are lighting up the Internets:
The Soto-Storm
"Okay, we're all interested in President Obama's Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor," writes Chris Rovzar in this nice roundup. "But today it's just getting to feel like too much. Not because democracy in action is ever boring, but because the media has lost its head." That being said, bloggers have had a day to think the Sotomayor appointment over, and the battle lines are forming. As per yesterday, let's look at reactions from both sides of the political spectrum. First up: conservatives. Damon Root is concerned: "On the hot-button issues of affirmative action and Second Amendment rights, her record suggests a decidedly illiberal vision of constitutional law." Alex Knepper writes that "Sotomayor's nomination is a unique opportunity for the conservative movement to rally all of its factions together," but calling her a racist for saying the following is not the way to go: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman, with the richness of her experiences, would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." Conservative Ed Morrissey thinks the GOP can win by using the competence argument. And Philip Klein sums up conservative outrage: "The Obama/Sotomayor idea that judges, instead of making impartial rulings based on the law and the Constitution, should base their decisions (at least in part) on their own experiences and ethnic background, is outrageous."
The Liberal Reaction
Most liberals write today less on Sotomayor than on the Republicans' strategy for attacking her. What's a blogpost, after all, if it isn't about "the opposition"? Jay Newton-Small thinks the GOP's plan is to "walk softly and carry a huge magnifying glass." Greg Sargent writes that the reaction from the right is already helping liberals. Democrats, he predicts, will respond by arguing that GOP opposition to Sotomayor "is all about Republican extremism" and not her competence as a judge. David Kurtz concurs: "So far the criticisms of Sonia Sotomayor are much more revealing about her conservative critics than they are about her." In an odd twist, one liberal blogger focuses on the dry subject of what Sotomayor actually thinks. Robert Reich thinks GOP attacks on Sotomayor will end up decimating what's left of the Republican Party: "It's also possible that without much remaining of any moderate view inside their own ranks, Republicans may simply lack the wisdom—dare I call it judiciousness?—to opt for a more sensible strategy."
The Rest of Today's News
Thomas E. Ricks notes that North Korea's acting unusually reckless. Here's a great summary of the NoKo situation that Ricks points his readers to. Looks like John McCain's had a feeling NoKo was up to no good. Liberal Rob Thomas has a big gay chip on his shoulder because of the latest setback to gay marriage in California. The Washington Post's E.J. Dionne pens this piece for The New Republic, in which he looks at how the Obama administration goes about manipulating the media: "The disturbing aspect of Obama's effort to create his new political alignment is that building it requires him to send rather different messages to its component parts. Playing to several audiences at once can lead to awkward moments." And Karen Tumulty singles out one healthcare story that you should read today.
... Meanwhile ...
Russian President Vladimir Putin writes his first magazine column on pink slips... Alas, the F-bomb likely has no home in the workplace... And are you wondering if the recession's over? Check your underpants.
Check out our political cartoons.
Reader Comments
Sotomayor states the obvious...
Ahhh, Newt...leave it to an old white guy to further alienate the youth and people of color from the Republican party. As a woman of color, Sotomayor has experienced life in a whole different way than a white man. Her comment which was made 8 years ago is not racist, but is merely stating the obvious. In order to rid of society of racism, we need to recognize that racism exists and that historically people of color have needed to work harder than whites for the same opportunities. Hopefully, electing the first black president shows that our society is changing.
Rights accusation of racism shows ignorance
Sotomayor has an impressive resume and is plenty qualified for the job which is why the right is focussing on an out of context comment and sickly trying to deem it racist. This only demonstrates the right's ignorance of white privilege and the true meaning of racism. Racism in society is the unjust discrimination based on race against a group of people who are not in a position of power by a group of a different race who are in a position of power. The key word here is POWER! If the right understood what racism was they would understand that racism against whites rarely happens in our society because whites are still in the majority of power positions in our society. Therefore I think the meaning of Sotomayor's comment is that an educated Latina woman has needed to overcome many more obstacles in her lifetime than a white educated man and therefore has a different perspective and understanding of our society as a whole. The more the right screams racism the more it demonstartes their ignorance of their own white privilege and the more it shows truth in Sotomayor's comment.
Life stories...
For one reason or another, this country focuses on sensational and emotional things rather than objective data. Best example of this can be seen with Sotomayor. While I do not mean to discredit her background, but I have a neat life story too about how I have over come my essential tremors in my hands and my learning disability. Yet my life story does not mean I am qualified to be a plumber or an astronaut. However, according to the media, it means I am qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice just because I have an amazing life story. Come on people! Why don't we start looking at how she makes rulings and what her political views are?
advertisement









