Why Women Are Fleeing the Republican Party
Less likely to run anyway, women cringe at being in the party of exclusion
My sister worked after college as a receptionist for a congressman. One day, the male chief of staff arrived for work and dumped a bag full of shoes on her desk. "Take these down to the shoe shine for me," he said, breezing by. "That's not my job," she insisted. "I won't do it." "Oh, yes, it is," the chief of staff countered. Then he looked her right in the eye and said, through clenched teeth, while standing mere steps from the Capitol of the United States, "This is not a democracy." She quit right there and walked out the door.
That was 25 years ago, and Capitol Hill still isn't a democracy. Even though a higher percentage of women than men vote and more than half of the electorate is female, Capitol Hill is still a man's world. And despite the fact that there is a female speaker of the House for the first time in history, only about 20 percent of Democratic seats in the House and Senate are held by women, and even fewer—10 percent—of GOP seats are. The truth is that women are underrepresented in our democracy. Why?
Research conducted by Brown University shows women are less likely to run for office in the first place, for reasons having to do with women's perceptions of themselves. They're less likely to perceive themselves as "qualified," less likely to be recruited to run, and less likely to express ambition for running for office. All of that rings true to me.
Another consideration is that most women are the primary caregivers in their families—whether they work full time or not, Republican or Democratic—and many are part of the "sandwich" generation, raising kids and caring for aging parents at the same time. Most members of Congress are lucky if their families accompany them to Washington; many spouses stay back in the district with the kids while the officeholder commutes back and forth weekly. No one likes to admit it, but that's a lot easier for a dad to pull off than for a mom. Granted, members of Congress do have most of the summer off, frequent recesses, and free healthcare, but that's not a situation most women see and say, "Sign me up!" The few who do sign up are far more likely to be Democrats than Republicans.
From what I can tell, there are several reasons for what Politico this week called "the minority within a minority," the shrinking number of Republican women in elected office. First, there's the math. A recent Gallup Poll shows women are more likely to identify themselves as Democrats than Republicans by a 14-point margin, 41 percent to 27 percent. Historically, women have been more likely to say they are Democrats, but the gap clearly is widening. Plus, with more voters overall identifying themselves as Democrats than Republicans, there are more Democrats from whom to recruit female candidates—and from whom to get votes.
Twenty years ago, women elected to Congress were nearly as likely to be Republican as Democratic. But that's changed as fewer and fewer women run for fewer and fewer GOP seats. Democrats hold majorities in both Houses, and the built-in advantages to incumbents have been well documented. According to pollsters Kellyanne Conway and Celinda Lake, women themselves are more likely to vote for incumbents. "Ironically, this natural bias toward re-electing incumbents is one reason many women who run for office as challengers are unsuccessful," they report. With Democrats in power, those challengers are more likely to be Republicans.
But there is also a cultural problem for Republican recruiters. Maine's Olympia Snowe, one of four GOP women currently serving in the U.S. Senate, said recently: "[We] as a party are saying we're not supporting Republican moderates. That's a terrible message to send. . . . It tells everyone else in America who might have an interest in running as a Republican moderate, they're going to have to think twice. The messages coming out of the national party are critical. They've got to be embracive and inclusive of political diversity. They can't on one hand say we're going to build a majority and then say we only want people with certain characteristics, like white males from the South. That's a concern to me."
She's right. The negative campaigns at all levels, the extremist rhetoric coming out of the right wing, the litmus-test mentality of those accusing others of being "RINOs"—Republicans in Name Only—all present a less-than-welcome message to moderate women who believe in limited but active government, a strong defense, and market-oriented solutions to the economic downturn. Right now, to most reasonable women—like my sister—the GOP isn't much of a democracy.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
are you being fooled by the republicans?
women that listen to the republicans rhetoric of Abortion is just that.they want to take away your right to choose
they claim that the reason they are against abortion is its cruel operation,thats very compelling,until you look at the truth of their claim,because once the child is born and the mother have no way to provide for it,and it sleep with its mother in homeless shelters and if you ask the repugnant republican"s
for help, you would be barking up the wrong tree, if it wasn't for the democrats do you know they would
refuse to give you assistance,yet they care so much for your child, as long as you don't ask them for anything,so think about it, all this value stuff they been selling you is a big bag of hooey, they don't care for you, or your baby, if you poor. they just care for the big Lie they have being representing!
end of story!
Ever notice
how 'moderate' republicans rail about the 'extremeist' rightwing of the party, without ever being clear on what their own principles are? Here's my conservative Republican view: If you vote for and want Obama's fiscal and social policies YOU ARE NOT A REPUBLICAN. The republican tent now encompasses most Americans based on polling data. Now if elected Republicans would Stop seeking common ground with Democrats, we'd win in a landslide. "Common ground" repubs are RINOS,like it or not! Why would any independent voter vote for a RINO when they've got the real thing (Dem) already there? One more observation:limited, 'active' governments don't stay limited for long, now do they?
Oh Really?
I find this opinion incredibly disengenuous... Maybe that's why a recent Rasmussen/Gallup Poll showed that Democrats and Republicans are now basically tied when it comes to voter identification. Women who I know are only one issue voters and I have no respect for that. The strong, independent, business oriented females, such as myself, are strong fiscal conservatives as well as strong national defense advocates etc. I don't want to run for office because my life would get picked apart esp. as a female with an R next to her name - I saw what happened to one in 2008 by the hateful left. If you want to talk about fringe groups maybe you should look a the vitriol that comes from the left side of the spectrum. There are strong female personalities in the republican party like Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Megyn Kelly, Laura Ingraham, Monica Crowley, Tammy Bruce who has since turned to the right, and I could keep going. Many of the females I know do not register for a specific party but they always vote republican - for example, I am unaffiliated but will prob. change my affiliation come primary season. Principles should matter more than anything else and if a woman running for office would rather move to the left and drop important republican platforms then she should deal with the consequences of that. Character, ethics, morals and integrity and above all else, principles, should matter in elected office - your example of either Snowe or Collins is quite laughable. I suggest you do your homework and see what happens comes 2010 when people realize how wrong and irresponsible/corrupt the Democrats in office are.
The only intolerance and meanness I see comes from the liberals and how they treat republicans and esp. conservatives. But I guess the only way anyone will wake up to that fact is when it's too late - you know that whole frog in the pot analogy?
advertisement









