The Supreme Court After Souter, the Torture Debate, and the Future of the Economy

Supreme Court Appointees

Many Presidents have tried to push the court to their political leaning, fortunately, it is usually a disappointment. The founding fathers had the wisdom to make the appointment for life. The process was also well thought out in that there is only a certain window in which a nominee can fit which limits extremes to the left or the right. While many on the right are worried about who will replace Souter, many on the left are excited at what can be done for liberal causes. Both are likely to be disappointed. Do you remember the liberals screaming over the choice of Souter because they thought he was an extreme conservative? History has shown that some of the most liberal Presidents have chosen some of the most conservative justices as well as some of the most conservative Presidents having nominated some of the most liberal justices. Assuming the nominee can pass the guantlet of the process, even if he/she is at the far end of either spectrum, that process removes the extremists and once nominated, an intelligent experienced justice takes on a respect and responsibility that probably fulfills a lifetime dream. I believe history has shown that once in that secure position they rise to the office and try to limit any personal prejudice while administering their profound duties with honor and dignity. When a issue specific supporter like Pro-life or Pro-choice is championing or protesting a President it is really kind of silly given that history has shown the President will likely have a minimal effect on such decisions.