10 Years After Columbine, Fear Sells Guns and America is Still Buying
Lawmakers cower as guns continue to kill people and excuses drown out reason
Tom Mauser of Colorado Ceasefire is the f ather of Columbine victim Daniel Mauser and maintains a memorial page to his son at http://www.danielmauser.com.
Just what does it take to get America's attention and action? A lot, apparently.
In recent weeks we've seen a terrible spate of horrific mass shootings of every sort. Yet what's been our reaction? Most do little beyond shake their heads and say, "How tragic." We seem incapable of doing anything to deal with gun violence the way other Free World nations have done.
Gun violence has become our domestic terrorism. We lose nearly 11,000 to gun homicide each year, and three times that number are injured. But that's not enough to stir most Americans into action.
Too many Americans are influenced by the excuses and slick clichés of the gun lobby. You've heard them all—"Guns don't kill people, people kill people"; "One more gun law won't make a difference." But excuses and clichés don't solve problems. Meanwhile, the gun lobby just keeps offering up the same, tired old solutions: more guns, no new gun laws, fewer gun restrictions, and more punishment. We've been there and done that, yet still have a shameful gun violence problem.
Fear sells well in America. The gun lobby and industry have made many Americans fear an armed takeover, and convinced many that any form of gun control is a major step toward the total elimination of all guns.
No single gun law can stop all shootings, but inaction will do absolutely nothing. Punishment alone isn't enough, because in most cases once we lose our loved ones it is too late, and because punishment doesn't stop shooters intent on committing suicide following their rampage.
We have to be serious about prevention. But it's tough to even get that in this country. Shouldn't we at least make sure the most dangerous people, like felons, spouse abusers, and the mentally disturbed, do not have easy access to firearms? Thanks to the gun lobby, in 33 states we allow those dangerous people to walk into a gun show and easily purchase a firearm from a private seller without having to pass a background check. That's the gaping "gun show loophole," and the gun lobby fiercely fights to keep it open.
The gun lobby defends military-style assault weapons, even though they allow criminals and government haters to outgun our police. These are weapons intended to inflict massive damage. The gun lobby claims that not too many people are killed with them. Well, just how many would they consider an excessive number?
So why do Americans tolerate weak gun laws, loopholes, and these assault weapons of mass destruction? Because most of our political leaders are being held hostage by the most powerful and unforgiving lobby in America, the gun lobby. Many of our political leaders are badgered into submission by hard-core gun supporters. And we let them get away with it.
In Colorado, following Columbine, we did something to address the gun show loophole. We closed it. We put the issue on the statewide ballot and won by a margin of 70 percent to 30 percent—a mighty wide margin in a western, hunting, pro-gun state. It passed because voters understood it was a common-sense matter, and because it is much harder for the gun lobby to badger thousands of reasonable people than it is to badger a small group of legislators.
Until we put more measures on the ballot or learn to put more pressure on elected officials to offset the relentless badgering of the gun lobby, this country will continue to have weak gun laws and a shamefully high level of gun violence.
Most Americans support a basic right to bear arms. However, they also recognize that no right is absolute and they understand the need for some reasonable restrictions for their protection. But they are not going to see many reasonable restrictions so long as the gun lobby has a strangle hold on our decision makers.
I am an optimist by nature, but I believe that, unfortunately, the voices of reason will continue to be overwhelmed by the voices of fear. Sadly, it may take the loss of many more lives before Americans come to their senses and stop letting the gun lobby have its way. Many more lives may be lost before America finally acknowledges that it's not wise to let gun policy be written by the gun lobby. The only question now is just how many more lives will have to be lost before America seeks a new direction. How many? I pray America will say we have already have lost too many.
Reader Comments
education
in india give more imparatence of education but system is not good.teacher selecte methad ofter compliting the deegri.its help to children
The Author Got One Thing Right
Though I don`t share his opinions I was glad to see the author has a basic understanding of the assualt rifle. To wit, that he uses the correct terminology in describing it as more destructive and NOT as more powerful. The assualt rifle was designed to fire more rounds than a regular rifle not more powerful ones. In fact, German combat engineers realized most fighting takes place at about 300 meters. So the assualt rifle was designed to fire a less powerful cartridge, of less weight giving the soldier the ability to carry more ammunition and be more prolific in using it for suppresive fire. It gives a minimum credit to his argument that sadly most anti-gunners lose coming right out of the gate.
Gun Show Issue
David from Michigan,
I read with interest your comment regarding our Second Amendment rights and respect your views. It seems most gun owners oppose any form of gun control legislation for fear it will ultimately lead to confiscation. I don’t know if Mr. Mauser favors confiscation. I think not. But we do know from his article that he wants to see the gun show “loophole” closed in every state by requiring background checks from unlicensed sellers at gun shows. You seem knowledgeable on constitutional rights and I wonder if you would comment on this specific issue.
Some years ago, a survey done by the U.S. Department of Justice with a large sampling of state and federal prison inmates who used firearms in the commission of their crimes, reported that just 1.7% of them accessed those firearms from flea markets and gun shows. That may seem like an insignificant number (I don't think it is) however; the same survey reported that almost 40% accessed firearms from illegal sources on the street or underground. Since it is impossible to trace the route those guns took to the street, doesn’t it seem likely that a significant number of those originated though easy access from unlicensed sellers at gun shows? I remember reading that the ATF agrees that it is likely. I think it is a significant source especially today when we have seen some of the most dangerous street gangs migrating from the metropolitan areas to almost every community in the United States. Illegal gun sales are a source of income for them.
Mr. Mauser wants to save lives and I totally support his position on the gun show loophole issue. I believe the privilege of the Second Amendment brings us a moral responsibility…to do whatever is reasonable that will prevent from happening again the kind of catastrophe that was handed to his 15-year-old son.
I hope that you will respond with your thoughts. My name is Greg and I live in Kaukauna, Wisconsin.
advertisement









