We Must Stop the Government From Seizing Laptops at the Border
You wouldn't think it would happen in this country, would you?
In the post-September 11 world, it goes without question that the security of the American people is first and foremost. Customs agents have the right and responsibility to conduct even very intrusive searches of traveling Americans. But suspicionless searches of the contents of laptops or similar electronic devices go too far.
Those kinds of searches are also likely to be ineffective and inefficient. The department has not identified a single case in which a suspicionless search uncovered evidence of wrongdoing. If anything, suspicionless searches undermine border security by wasting the limited resources of customs agents at the border. They also impose a hefty price tag on American businesses—which are forced to take costly steps to protect confidential business information—at a time when the economy needs all the help it can get.
Congress needs to prohibit this gross violation of the privacy of law-abiding Americans. That is why I introduced the Travelers Privacy Protection Act. The bill would require Homeland Security agents to have reasonable suspicion before searching the contents of laptops and similar electronic equipment carried by U.S. citizens or other lawful residents of the United States. Reasonable suspicion is not a burdensome standard to meet; it simply requires the department to have some legitimate reason for suspecting that a particular person is engaged in illegal behavior. The bill also prohibits random profiling based on race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. This kind of profiling is inconsistent with our values, and it is counterproductive as a matter of law enforcement.
Congress must bring the government's practices at the border back in line with the reasonable expectations of law-abiding Americans. Requiring reasonable suspicion for electronic border searches respects Americans' privacy and enhances the security of our borders by focusing the government's resources where they can do the most good. And it will restore the confidence of law-abiding Americans who don't understand why the government can look at the most sensitive personal details of their lives without any reason to think they've done anything wrong. That kind of thing shouldn't happen in the United States of America, and it won't happen if the Travelers Privacy Protection Act is the law of the land.
Russell Feingold, a Democrat, is a U.S. senator from Wisconsin. He chairs the Constitution Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Reader Comments
An Outrage and a Disgrace
So, the government should be given irrefutable access to electronic information possessed by an individual based on reasonable suspicion? How low has this country sunk?
There IS no circumstance which should allow the government to say, "Hand me the laptop." I don't care what Homeland Security or the Patriot Act says, this is more than a violation of basic rights or a transgression of the 4th Amendment. Setting aside for the moment the ludicrous question of what reasons should allow for it, seizure and inspection of an inherently non-threatening, electronic device is nothing short of executive fascism.
I had been fearing this kind of action ever since Bush's infamous measures to "protect the homeland" and seek out and destroy "evildoers." Whoever believes terrorism is evil does not understand terrorism and should have nothing to do with fighting it.
Until today, I was a reasonably proud American. After reading this article, I am ashamed to call myself "American."
Unfortunately, I don't have enough money to travel away, but if I do, I will be sure any hard drives I bring will be encrypted so officials can make utter fools of themselves trying to extract information from them. Of course, by that time, I may be detained until I give them the passwords, given the current course of this country.
airport searches
The whole idea that Americans can be invasively searched at borders or airports sucks big time. Did 911 give the government the right to tyranny? Suspending our Constitutional rights?
Goodbye and good riddance to Bush and his Bush******t
Rules
Problem is the conflict between rules abiders and rules breakers. When the just strictly abide by the rules, the unjust use the honest against themselves for selfish advantage. When the breach is broken by the honest to infiltrate the undermining dishonest to end the attacks against decency and right, there becomes a 'necessary' losing of the integrity of right. Such is the course of evil and the battles against it to stave off disrespect and disloyalty - but, such is the course of good to re-establish concern. The twin towers still should be rebuilt.
advertisement









