Iran's Missile Launch a Rebuke of the United States
The meaning is largely political as Iranian President Ahmadinejad is up for re-election on June 12
Reader Comments
The US is the terroist
Mass murdering stealing nations wealth and mass killing. The US , Britain, France, Germany, Austrailia are the worst filthy stealing terroist on the planet. You are a terroist if these mass killers and plunderers can't control your wealth. Many nations such as Cuba, Venezuela, Sudan, Iran have wowed that they will never let the palefaced plunderers of native indians control their countries. The US is the worst criminal empire in the mordern world at the end of its reign. An empire of theives, liars, perverts and demoniacs. There is no democracy in the peripheral of the US concerns, just rape and plunder, all know who objectively know the history. Now the US is a failed state pleading to bailed out again by the resources of the nation they cry about. But there are no more INJUNS and we won't cry uncle. The die is cast, let the citadel of all evil burn. WWIII
Is the ride worth the fall, tyrants?
To all tyrants such as President "Kim Da Dong Der Whang-Dang-Doodle" of North Korea, with his "Taepodong" missles (think phonetically, & you won't be scared after all), President "I'm a bad madman" of Iran, & President "Wherego Shifty Chavez" of Venezuaela, do they really want to pick a cage-match against the USA and Israel? Do they really think the ride is worth the fall? They may think they have it all "On A Ritz" cuz they fight dirty and have alot of terorist organizations in their corner. Well, we got a few aces up our sleeves, too. In our corner we have Uncle Sam & the American Eagle. Israel is in tight with God (read the Bible, you Godless tyrants...my money is on us good guys). We also have "Smith & Wesson", two guys who'd get a "bang" outta loudmouths like these dictators learning the way of the world with a flick of the trigger-finger (nothing good on TV, so what the heck, gotta find something to do...how about a little "regime-change" to break the boredom?). And of course we have the Campbell's, who'd love to "open up a can of cream of whoop-arse soup" here and now. Yeah, I don't think these dictators would be so brave once we started dumping Mr. North Korea out of his rickshaw, Mr. Iran ("I-Ran"?!) off of his magic flying carpet into the Ali-Baba alleyway. and Mr. Venality-zuaela would get shaken right outta his tin-pot dictator banana tree. You know, while we are at it, let's get a few others, too, like Mugabe over in Africa. He'd be known as "shoe-shine boy" when we got done with that shriveled-up old cricket. He's not much better than that cannibal of yesteryear, "Eatie Amin"! So he's gotta go, too.
Well, guess that's enough ranting for tonight. Just thought I would give it the level of intellectual discussion small-change dictators deserve. Oh, for more of the same, catch my other previous comment, too, regarding this article, above. With speeches like this, maybe I'll put my spaghetti-strainer on my head like a battle helmet ("Move over, Generals MacArthur & Patton; here comes JMG!") and run for President...bet I'd win (but no votes for me from dictators...wonder why?). So whaddaya think? Ranting is fun!
Problem using military during a campaign...
Ahmadinejad is most likely going to win ladies and gentlemen. No, I am not a prophet, but typically in countries that try to pass themselves off as democratic the opponent of the ruling party dies mysteriously unless he/she is more powerful than the ruling party. Also, Ahmadinejad has been depriving his people necesseties in order to enhance his military. To keep the masses happy, he tells them that their sacrifice is helping the proud Islamic-Arab people to overcome the West and annihilate the Jewish state of Israel. Using similar rhetoric and propaganda that Hitler used, Ahmadinejad is seen as a hero among many of his people.
But there is one problem, he hasn't really hurt the West in any large way and he has yet to begin the jihad against Israel. Naturally, people are beginning to question his credibility. Therefore, we have the present situation where he's launching missiles that can most likely hit American and Israeli military outposts. The Israelis are naturally preparing for an attack. Of course, the citizens of Iran believe that at last they may finally see their suffering come to an end with the crippling of the US and the destruction of Israel.
As I have said before, Ahmadinejad is most likely going to win. If he does, his people are expecting a usage of military might. If he fails to do this, he will be facing an uprising of angry peasants. Of course this is improbable and Ahmadinejad is going to do one of two things:1) actually start a war with Israel and the US, or 2) he is going to start a slight skirmish with Israel and that it. I believe the latter mainly because it would not cost him too many of his soldiers and he would not have to worry about the possibility of Israel already having nukes. Also, if the battle doesn't go to hot, then he can tell his people that Israel's evil friends stepped in and made the fight uneven. And because the fight was uneven, the Iranian people must continue in their poverty because the West and Israel continue to withold their rights.
Personally, I believe Barak Obama first needs to get a backbone and then send in our airforce to destroy Iran's airbases/fields and all launch sites for long range missiles. Then we tell the Iranians to sit down, shut up, and do as they're told!
What's good for the goose....!
Here is what we should do to rogue states like Iran and North Korea, to name just two of a much greater number: let's aim our biggest, baddest Holy Mamma Mia-sized missles right at their capitals, and say, "OK, Wienies, NOW we'll negotiate!"..and just for the record, I would have no compunction or qualms about launching those missles if pushed--or nudged--or even tickled, dig?! And in the meantime, how about a little "regime-change" by American Government-sanctioned hitmen (uh, in this case, read "Patriot")? I could pull the trigger with no problem whatsoever on guys like the leaders of North Korea, Iran, Venezuala, Sudan, Syria, the heads of groups like Hezbollah & Hamas,drug-lords...whomsoever's just plain evil! Think of all the American lives, blood & treasure, as well as those of our allies we would save by doing in the bad-guys? Edmund Burke said, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." I, James M. Gau, a flag-waving, world-saving all-American Boy, say, this is truly where the bear-flop lies in the buckwheat, boy! Leaders of rogue nations, groups, etc., should be lighting a candle tonight and thanking God I am not President, or there would be a "slobber-knocker extraordinaire", lemme tell ya!
Maybe when one of our citizens has his head cut off, we should execute 500 of their people we have taken prisoner, and shower the decapitated heads over Bahgdad from out of an airplane. Perhaps they would get the point. Although a Republican, white, male, Lutheran, American patriot with hawkish leanings, I do not approve of torture. However, that being said, since this issue tends to go hand in hand with terrorists, their groups, & countries, we should line up the baddies and say, "There will be no torture or mistreatment. However, we will put a gun against the first bad-guy's head. If he does not start talking convincingly within two minutes, we will immediately "sanction him with extreme prejudice"! No talk--bang! He's dead. Move on to the next one in line. Same option. Talk or a cordite kiss from our one-eyed .45 caliber lover. No talk? Kapow. Bet after we were part-way down the line, the last few would sing like canaries doing an aria! But I suppose this is America...we are too civilized to do that. OK, but just remember the bad-guys don't play by the Queen's Rules, which opens up alot of options for them. What we could do is any oppressed or rogue nation, we could fly overhead with many airplanes, showering down copies of our US Constition, Bill Of Rights, etc., written in each of those countires' particular native languages. Perhaps enough citizens would pick these pamphlets up, read them, and it might light an intellectual spark :(ie: "Hey, we could have this kind of good life, too, just like the USA does in their nation!") Hey, who knows, it might work! Ah, the power of propaganda! We gotta stick together, us good guy nations: the USA, Britain, Israel, Australia, a few more... we might survive!
Obama, (Perhaps The Last Pres Of The USA)
America in end-times:
Wake up you blind Folks called American and see the hand-witting on the wall of national survival. You have for the first time in American History sitting in the White-House a neutered president, who no doubt is willing to give the whole D nation away,and that is easy to do without balls of courage to face up to challenges of any other county. It takes just one man to bring the most powerful nation on earth,America, to its knees,and his name is Obama. And in mourning, Lets paint the White-House Black.
How to kill a snake, rogue nuke countries
You don't only take out their nuke-sites but you take out their seat of command,their major command structure and their major cities with your own nukes first. Why would anyone in his right mind leave in place a rogue country,s ability to launch their missiles. You can call what I just said Over-Kill if you want to. But If I were calling the shots,the above is just what I would do,or you can wait until they have nuke capability, Then you can bend over and kiss your butt goodbye
Fake Country
If anyone is a fake country it is America. Isreal stood the test of time as the Bible clearly shows us. I would not want to be on the opposing side of them. As far as Obamah, he is a coward and so is that bull dyke Hillary Clinton! They are so concerned with peaceful solutions which have failed over the years that if China, N. Korea, or Iran wanted to land troops on our shores and take us over they very easily could do that. Our military has been cut back to nothing, our troops are spread too thin through out the world and Obamah is a coward hiding behind his angry letters.
The president's backbone...
Muser, I have yet to see the President take a position with N. Korea or Iran that has a backbone. The only thing he has suggested is to talk peace and write angry letters that say how angry the world is that N. Korea dared to defy the witless UN. As far as I can see, Obama belongs to the group of liberals that believe everything can be achieved through peace talks. I'm sorry, but the world doesn't work that way.
Plenty of time remains
to talk with an Iranian president AFTER we're sure which one will be elected.
As for Iran's nukes, someone is eventually going to take them out. USA or Israel. Think Obama "wouldn't"? Think again. Same with North Korea.
Fake country?
Uh, zach of AK, how is Israel a fake country? It has a working government and a military that has been tried and tested in battle. It also allows its people to voice their opinions by forming political parties. What more do you need?
Also, are all 70,000,000 soldiers, or are you just making up that number to scare everybody else?
One more thing, Israel has fought against multiple armies before during its short modern history and has survived. I do not think Iran will be much of a problem.
