The Rise of Islamic Banking in a Time of Economic Crisis

People walk past the first Islamic Bank of Britain in London, England.

Conservative approach. Islamic banks have avoided the subprime fiasco. "There are no toxic assets," says Natalie Schoon, BLME's head of product development. "As a result, there are no problems with big write-offs. One of the advantages that the Islamic sector has as a whole is that there is still liquidity." That, as well as the conservative nature of its business model, is a big reason that it's attracting more non-Muslim clients. Middle Eastern investors have amassed so many petrodollars they have no choice but to look for opportunities beyond the Persian Gulf region, particularly in the politically stable environments of the United Kingdom and Europe. That's why Islamic banks are setting up operations there. Also, London is attracting those outposts because of Britain's historical links to the region and the strong financial talent pool to draw on. In fact, most of the top executives at the Islamic banks in London are British or European, and they are old hands in City banking. The government's concerted wooing efforts have also helped. "The government is actually supporting Islamic finance," Schoon says. "It's not seen as a threat; it's seen as an opportunity."

As with traditional banks, the Islamic banks in London must meet levels of transparency sometimes lacking in other parts of the world. "Regulation is important," Schoon explains. "Investors like the fact that you are regulated." The London Stock Exchange began listing sukuks this year, and 18 are now trading there, a useful increase of liquidity. The British government, as early as next year, is expected to make the country the first in the West to issue its own sovereign sukuks to raise as much as $3 billion. That should help set a benchmark price and encourage more banks to issue the bonds.

The government's sukuks, which would be the first in the world to be triple-A rated, would also give the United Kingdom an alternative route to raise money from the oil-rich Middle East. The plan is not without critics, however, who claim the government is giving religious-based sharia law official standing. Critics also raise concerns that sukuks could be used to finance terrorism. But Rodney Wilson, an expert on Islamic finance at Durham University, says that's an unlikely scenario. "Most Gulf banks do have fairly sophisticated monitoring systems in place" to ferret out money-laundering, terrorism, or other abuses, Wilson says. The 9/11 terrorists, he notes, used western banks to finance their operations.

A more practical problem is a lack of product standardization. Sharia-compliant financing relies on Islamic scholars to determine if products are in accordance with the Koran. But definitions of what is acceptable can vary greatly, not only from region to region but from bank to bank. Typically, Malaysian scholars tend to offer more flexible interpretations of sharia law than do their counterparts in the Gulf. Each bank has its own board of scholars, and even among the London banks there's no uniformity. Schoon says she's seen deals arranged by rival London banks that BLME's board—which comprises two scholars from the Gulf and two from Asia—would have vetoed.

BLME's toxic-free balance sheet helped convince Blue Ocean's board that, despite being a new bank, it was fundamentally strong. The company also liked the "shared-risk, shared-reward" ethos of Islamic banking, Aslam says. Essentially, each is making a vote of confidence in the other. If they're both right, that bodes well not only for the future of BLME but for the continued growth of Islamic banking in London. And that should give City burghers at least one thing to smile about.

• Read why Islamic states would be bad for Muslims.
• Read Secrets of Islam: A Guide to the World's Fastest Growing Religion
• Read Can Women's Rights Coexist With the Tenets of Islamic Law?