Thursday, November 26, 2009

Religion

Obama Seeks Common Ground on Abortion

The administration is working with advisers to develop its "common ground" plan

Posted June 16, 2009

As a member of President Obama's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, Nancy Ratzan clearly believes that faith has a role in government. But that doesn't mean she's comfortable with the role the White House's faith-based office is playing in devising Obama's policies on abortion and other reproductive issues. "I have real concerns about understanding those issues from a faith perspective as opposed to a scientific and individual rights perspective," says Ratzan, who is president of the National Council of Jewish Women and a supporter of abortion rights. "You're creating the possibility that the religious views of some are going to be imposed on others."

Over the last month or so, the Obama administration has met with Ratzan and dozens of other activists on both sides of the abortion issue as it seeks what it calls "common ground" on thorny reproductive issues, including its goal of reducing demand for abortion. Now, as the White House begins drawing up a policy plan, advocates on both sides are jittery. "I'm in a trust but verify mode," says Richard Land, who heads public policy for the Southern Baptist Convention, which opposes abortion rights. "I've seen some signs that they are eagerly seeking common ground and other signs that they're not."

The administration is expected to announce its plan as early as this summer, according to those involved in the process. Whether those proposed policies can satisfy the president's pro-abortion rights base while also winning over more conservative religious groups is the biggest test yet for Obama's vow to be a peacemaker in the nation's culture wars.

When Obama rolled out the revamped White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships in February, he tasked it with exploring how to "support women and children, address teenage pregnancy, and reduce the need for abortion." Crafting policy around those goals has been a joint project of the faith-based office and the new White House Council on Women and Girls. Both report to Obama's domestic policy adviser, Melody Barnes, who has led some meetings with outside groups.

Those sessions have included representatives from organizations as politically far apart as the pro-abortion rights Planned Parenthood and the evangelical Concerned Women for America, which vigorously opposes such rights. The White House asked those and other groups for policy proposals in four areas: reducing unwanted pregnancy, increasing access to adoption, supporting maternal health, and reducing demand for abortion. "There were definitely areas of disagreement," Kristen Day, who runs an antiabortion group called Democrats for Life, says in describing a recent White House meeting. "But for the most part, people were respectful and were doing more listening than debating."

The administration has stressed that it will avoid influencing pregnant women's decisions about whether to have abortions but wants to find ways to support those who decide to carry their pregnancies to term. So far, though, the White House has avoided giving any hint about what its "common ground" plan on abortion and related issues will look like. Aides working on the matter declined to comment for this column.

Some abortion-rights proponents are confident the plan will avoid concessions to abortion-rights foes. "President Obama is strongly pro-choice," says Laurie Rubiner, vice president for public policy at Planned Parenthood. "I'm hopeful their policy will be helpful on reducing unintended pregnancies."

Some antiabortion groups, meanwhile, worry that focusing mostly on preventing unwanted pregnancy will include support for contraception for young people and comprehensive sex education, forcing them to oppose the White House's plan even if they support other parts of it. Those groups want the administration to embrace the Pregnant Women Support Act. Introduced by Democrats in Congress, the legislation aims to reduce abortions by providing assistance to economically distressed pregnant women. A congressional source close to the bill says the White House has expressed "significant interest" and that another meeting with Obama aides on the legislation is scheduled for this month.

But Planned Parenthood opposes parts of the bill that it says "attempt to influence, rather than inform, a woman's decision whether or not to have an abortion." The most conservative antiabortion groups, meanwhile, see the White House's abortion reduction effort as a politically inspired attempt to co-opt antiabortion voters with "common ground" rhetoric. "There is not a single pro-life policy that Obama has ever supported," says Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America. "So there's reason for skepticism."

Reader Comments

Pat says he & Comp "share love of Christ & the Gospel"

Pat & Comp can't understand mitosis and are not clear on the meaning of many words. Abortion, done early, removes so small a number of cells that they can fit in a container the size of a kidney bean. P & C accept doctored photos and drawings that pretend an early conception is the size of a small turkey.

To try to end discussion of the money-motive of Pro-Life, there's a death threat and use of the word "ninny." Pat says he and Compassion are reaching out to me "to share their love of Christ and the Gospel." They are evangelizing. That means they hope they can convert me to be a tither. That kind of "sharing" feels more like an offer to infect me with a disease. I took time to see how many children were born to nonexistent Adam and Eve, and here came another incest story. Cain's wife had to be a sister or other blood relative. Children are taught to love the Bible with its tale of incest after the Flood, among 8 survivors, and in the myth of Lot having a baby with each daughter. The topic of discussion here is Pro-Life and WHY its leaders demand government enforcement of church laws that ban abortion.

Pat & Compassion deny $ motive of Pro-Life, but--

Pro-life uses some tithe income to pay for misleading propaganda that tells people lies about mitosis. That's the process of cell division during pregnancy. My July 12 comment explained it, but the Prolifers refused to learn from it. The Washington State Department of Health gives a list of reportable inheritable diseases. Abortion gives welcome relief from being born with those terrible abnormalities. There's no compassion in a comment that uses the word "ninny" as a way to try to escape debate. Some commentators say they have "holes in their lives and they fill the holes with God and Christ." Those are elaborate hallucinations. Church income, how to get it and increase it, IS the reason for Ban-Abortion laws. Men have joined NARAL, National Abortion Rights Action League. They do this because they don't want to be FORCED to be fathers. The leading cause of death of pregnant women is to be killed by their impregnators.

aura, you are a ninny

aura, Compassion and I were reaching to someone. That is what Christians do. We share the love of God and the gospel. You think it is all about money. If it was all about money, why do pastors in foreign countries get beat up or even killed for their faith when they could simply pay off the government or whomever is persecuting them? Also, nobody puts a gun to your head when they pass the offerring plate. The worse you could get from a deacon or elder is a scowl for not giving something and that's it.

No, we do not believe an embryo or a fetus is a potential believer to pay tithes so that we must protect them. We believe that the fetus and the embryo is a human being created by God and deserves the chance to live life to the fullest. We are not talking about cancerous mass or a tape worm residing within a woman's body. We are talking about human life. And who are we to take away someone's life who has yet to commit one act, whether good or bad?

Do you believe Hitler was evil? If yes, then your last comment makes no sense. After all, where would all those Jews, gypsies, gays, mentally challenged, etc. be today? How could the world support them and their descendants? If you believe he wasn't evil, then you are crazy.

Where did somebody mispeak about mitosis?

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

Crossword Puzzle

Do You Like Crosswords?

We've added a new feature to our weekly digital magazine: an exclusive crossword puzzle!

advertisement

God & Country Blog

God and Country small square 78

Kennedy-Bishop Tiff: Your Thoughts

Comments on the public rift between Rep. Patrick Kennedy and Bishop Thomas Tobin fit a pattern.

Public Poll

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

SPECIAL REPORTS

A Muslim man lifts his hands up during Friday noon prayers in the southern holy city of Karbala, south of Baghdad.

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

The Maqbara hermitage at the Lama Foundation where a person can go on solo retreat.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Special Report: Women of the Bible

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.

Put U.S. News on Your Site

Keep up with the latest headlines by adding our news widget to your website.
Get this widget ยป


Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.