Lofgren: Ethics Report Leak Result of Hacking
The California Democrat says no inference should be made as to incorrect behavior based on the report
The chairwoman of the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct—commonly called the Ethics Committee—took to the floor of the House late Thursday to address the bombshell disclosure that more than two dozen House members are being investigated for allegations of influence peddling.
The investigations came to light, according to Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, as the result of a "cyberhacking incident of a confidential document of the committee." In an effort to reassure House members, she went on to say that the leak was an "isolated incident that to our knowledge has only occurred once." Lofgren said that the security system had not been breached.
In her one-minute address to the House, Lofgren quickly addressed the allegations themselves, explaining that at any one time "dozens of members' names are on our weekly report, and no inference should be made as to incorrect behavior on the part of those members." The Washington Post reported that House ethics investigators have been "scrutinizing" the activities of some 30 lawmakers for activities that include allegedly steering lucrative earmarks towards defense contractors in exchange for campaign contributions.
Lofgren downplayed the disclosure, noting that the committee is "obliged" to explore "extraneous matters that come to our attention, anything from a stray newspaper article to a comment involving members or staff, to make sure that there is nothing serious."
In the course of emphasizing this point on the House floor, she added, "For instance, when a colleague calls and asks about whether they can take a trip, their names would appear on this weekly report that the chair and ranking member receive. That doesn't mean that they are doing anything other than following the rules of the House to inquire whether they should take that trip or whether it is permissible."
A statement later released by the committee, Lofgren and ranking Republican member Jo Bonner of Alabama noted that an initial review suggested that "this unlawful access" to the confidential report which appeared in the Washington Post was the result of the use of file-sharing software by a junior staffer while working from home.
That staffer, according to the statement, "is no longer employed by the committee."
Reader Comments
Change Our Government
The current system is fatally flawed. Our elected officials don't listen to the people they were elected to represent. There are more than 30,000 lobbyists representing special interest groups and foreign governments. There are only 535 members of congress. Lobbyist use perks, jobs, trips, gifts, campaign contributions, bribes and even sex to influence our government. Term limits are a must. Nobody should be in office for life simply because they have a larger war chest for re-election. Every member of congress should be audited annually to insure they have not profited from their voting record.
On a side note, we should also do away with our presidential primary system. Do you realize that Iowa and New Hampshire decide which presidential candidates we vote for? These 2 states represent less than 1% of the population. They are easily manipulated by the wealthy elite. Do you really think the American people chose McCain and Obama as the best candidates for president? NO! Americans must demand a nationwide primary on the same day and put a stop to this practice. The current 2 party system guarantees the status quo. There are giving Americans ONE more choice than communists.
Checks and Balances
Wethe people must insist that all legislaters eg.Law makers. be subjectto mandatory "Term Limits". Like the Executive office all elected persons should be limited to a lenghth of tenure.
A career is one thing, sitting in a seat until death, that monarchy!
hacking? security not breached?
Hacking?
It was file sharing, meaning that the low level staffer left the front door open, not that a hacker attacked their system. It's called stupidity.
Security not breached?
We can read the report, right? Security was breached, from the inside, see above.
Let's put the blame where it belongs - on the committee, not on "cyberhackers". They can't even get there story straight.
advertisement









