The Most Consequential Elections in History: Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Election of 1932
FDR led America to victory in World War II
Eventually, the economy would again stall and Roosevelt's opponents would slow his programs. He would be accused of overreaching and betraying the American values of self-reliance and free market capitalism. But the election of 1932 had changed America forever.
'FDR would go on to win three more terms and lead America to victory in World War II. In the process, he became one of the nation's most beloved presidents and built a vast and powerful governing coalition. It consisted in part of working-class whites, union members, immigrants, African Americans, Southern whites, Catholics, Jewish voters, and city dwellers. This coalition dominated American politics for more than a generation—another key part of FDR's legacy.
More from our Most Consequential Elections series:
George Washington and the Election of 1788
Thomas Jefferson and the Election of 1800
Andrew Jackson and the Election of 1828
Abraham Lincoln and the Election of 1860
Abraham Lincoln and the Election of 1864
Theodore Roosevelt and the Election of 1904
Woodrow Wilson and the Election of 1912
Lyndon Johnson and the Election of 1964
Ronald Reagan and the Election of 1980
Reader Comments
The Greatest president of the 20 century
Thanks to Mr Kenneth T. Walsh for excellent article on FDR.
How important it is to study History. There are some parallels to the present situation.
FDR is a great Favorite for me, like Lincoln and Kennedy.
There are also parallels of the present times ( year 2008 ) to Lincoln and Kennedy. Specially on the subject of critiques of "inexperienced candidate".
I have read biographies in which FDR is portrayed as tender, human and respectful of others, particularly blacks.
Other stories and gossip tell me that he was unfaithful to wife Eleanor, and that he said some foolish racist things.
FDR also made the mistake of attacking the Supreme Court, and these judges did not like him too much.
FDR was a great friend of Latin America and got lots of political support and materials for the second world war in that region.
FDR followed the advice of Bismark of being very patient for political developments, You can not do what you want but you have to wait for the "developments". Churchill had to wait for America's involment.
Thanks a lot, US News and World Report. You are a magazine of Intelligence and Quality.
Vicente Duque
1960 Kennedy Election
I think the 1960 election is as close to 2008 as one can get. A junior Democratic Senator running after an 8 year Republican administration in recession during wartime (Cold vs. Iraq) a young minority (Catholic) Democratic candidate creating uncertainty whether his religion would trump his office facing an older Republican stalwart. Yes, in 1960 there were naysayers about JFK even saying the absurd such as putting a rosary around the State of Liberty not to mention his abilities to handle foreign affairs against an older Khrushchev and the very real threat of nuclear war. As in 1960, nobody knows for certain the best decision for America however, somehow the chosen candidate seems to rise to the office regardless. I feel it is best to take a chance on the new which can grow than the old which can only wilt. So I guess I'll go with Obamelot just like Camelot!!!
Undermining FDR's Legacy is the Target of Reactionary GOP
1932 is the most important election of the 20th Century, when FDR effectively stabilized a collapsing country and started to rise all boats to become the superpower that it is now. In discussion of this election, its important to point out the sore losers of that election and their descendants our modern GOP party that has spent the last fifty years trying to undermine and reverse FDR's legacy.
FDR was America's greatest modern president and his policies created the prosperity of the last fifty years that has made the US the superpower that is is. The list of FDR accomplishments is extensive and undeniably the greatest contributions to the US's success in the 20th Century.
Thank god for FDR institutions like the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the FDIC. FDR inherited a collapsed country from Republican incompetence and restored a populist government to work for the people, thus created mortal enemies of America's wealthy aristocracies and privileged oligarchies.
Unfortunately the GOP has never got over the election of 1932, and now we have an aristocratic GOP presidential candidate who has promised to continue rolling back FDR's reforms, exemplified by his promise to kill Social Security. We are enduring an administration now that has done everything in its power to erode or destroy regulatory agencies, by withholding any regulatory enforcement funding and by installing incompetence political hacks and industry insiders with conflicts of interest.
Folks who grew up in the depression knew who screwed up the economy and voted Democratic religiously. Again we see history repeating itself with Republicans like Bush screwing up our economy, bringing us close to another collapse. Fortunately some of FDR's institutions are still firewalls to some of the GOP incompetence, but the US economy might not survive another round of Republican economic impotency and GOP fiscal irresponsibility.
It is time to dump Bush/McCain if we don't want to see our country's economy and integrity continued to be squandered. We need to dump the current aristocracy with a real regime change, to bring real reforms to recover for the incompetence of the past eight years.
While USN&WR defines FDR as one of five inexperienced presidents, FDR has the competence to make his first 100 days in office after the 1932 election the most important period of reform and stabilization of our country at one of its most dire times. The current Republican presidential candidate offers the experience of Coolidge and Hoover, while our country is desperate for the competence of a Democrat like FDR and Clinton.
advertisement










