The Most Consequential Elections in History: Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Election of 1932
FDR led America to victory in World War II
The stakes in this year's presidential campaign are high. But that's nothing new. There have been many other pivotal presidential elections in our history, some that set an entirely new course for the United States and a few that were crucial to the very survival of the republic. To put the current campaign in perspective, U.S. News's White House Correspondent Kenneth T. Walsh, author of four books on the presidency, examines the 10 most consequential elections in American history—the races that produced the biggest change and had the most lasting impact. An installment of this 10-part series will run on the U.S. News website each Wednesday through September. This is the eighth in the series.
In the fall of 1929, the stock market crashed, factories slashed production, companies made deep cuts in jobs, salaries plummeted, and the nation seemed to be in the middle of a nervous breakdown. As the months wore on, wage earners grew desperate. Many didn't have enough money for food and rent, and more businesses contracted, producing further cuts in jobs and wages. Charities couldn't care for the millions of people who needed help, and Americans increasingly looked to the government for relief. But President Herbert Hoover argued that "rugged individualism" would prevail and that it was not the government's job to intervene aggressively in the economy.
By the end of his term, Hoover, a Republican, relented and tried to use the federal government to help those in need. But, by then, it seemed too late for limited measures, and his credibility was shattered. To challenge him, the Democrats nominated New York Gov. Franklin D. Roosevelt, a wealthy American aristocrat and fifth cousin of former President Theodore Roosevelt. His platform called for unemployment assistance, old-age insurance under state laws, legislation to protect labor, assistance for farmers, development of power plants, a repeal of Prohibition, and a balanced budget. He promised a "New Deal" for the American people and this became the slogan for FDR's campaign and, later, his administration.
He won the 1932 election in a landslide with 22.8 million votes to Hoover's 15.7 million. Roosevelt carried 42 states to Hoover's six. Journalist William Allen White said FDR's victory showed "a firm desire on the part of the American people to use government as an agency for human welfare." The electorate had, in effect, taken nearly 150 years of tradition upholding limited government and, in their anxiety and anger, thrown it out the window.
In his inaugural address, carried to millions on the radio, the new president said, "This great nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror, which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." His prescription was clear and heartening: "This nation asks for action, and action now. Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require." What followed was an unprecedented accretion of federal power.
It didn't take long for FDR to jettison one of his major campaign promises—to balance the budget. He felt the pledge was outweighed by the need for government activism, and he began a new era of vast deficit spending. His approach was pragmatic, designed to get results and rebuild hope for the future.
FDR proceeded to win congressional approval for a wave of expensive social and economic programs. In the first 100 days, many new federal agencies were created to alleviate the nation's plight, including the Federal Emergency Relief Administration to channel money through the states to the unemployed, the Civil Works Administration to create jobs; later, the Works Progress Administration to build long-term projects and create more jobs, and the Public Works Administration to build power plants, hospitals, schools, and other long-term projects with federal funds. The National Recovery Act gave the government broad powers to increase industrial production and help workers, such as by requiring a minimum wage of 40 cents an hour and giving labor the right to organize and strike.
This was only the start of a fundamental restructuring of government to create a social safety net and assist those in need.
FDR also understood the need to communicate effectively with the country. He dominated the media of his time—newspapers and especially radio—and connected directly with everyday people. One of his most powerful tools was the "fireside chat" on the radio in which he talked in a folksy, approachable way about the problems of the country and what he was doing about them. Millions of Americans tuned in, and his voice became one of the most recognizable in history. Most important, his jaunty optimism proved infectious.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page >
Reader Comments
The Greatest president of the 20 century
Thanks to Mr Kenneth T. Walsh for excellent article on FDR.
How important it is to study History. There are some parallels to the present situation.
FDR is a great Favorite for me, like Lincoln and Kennedy.
There are also parallels of the present times ( year 2008 ) to Lincoln and Kennedy. Specially on the subject of critiques of "inexperienced candidate".
I have read biographies in which FDR is portrayed as tender, human and respectful of others, particularly blacks.
Other stories and gossip tell me that he was unfaithful to wife Eleanor, and that he said some foolish racist things.
FDR also made the mistake of attacking the Supreme Court, and these judges did not like him too much.
FDR was a great friend of Latin America and got lots of political support and materials for the second world war in that region.
FDR followed the advice of Bismark of being very patient for political developments, You can not do what you want but you have to wait for the "developments". Churchill had to wait for America's involment.
Thanks a lot, US News and World Report. You are a magazine of Intelligence and Quality.
Vicente Duque
1960 Kennedy Election
I think the 1960 election is as close to 2008 as one can get. A junior Democratic Senator running after an 8 year Republican administration in recession during wartime (Cold vs. Iraq) a young minority (Catholic) Democratic candidate creating uncertainty whether his religion would trump his office facing an older Republican stalwart. Yes, in 1960 there were naysayers about JFK even saying the absurd such as putting a rosary around the State of Liberty not to mention his abilities to handle foreign affairs against an older Khrushchev and the very real threat of nuclear war. As in 1960, nobody knows for certain the best decision for America however, somehow the chosen candidate seems to rise to the office regardless. I feel it is best to take a chance on the new which can grow than the old which can only wilt. So I guess I'll go with Obamelot just like Camelot!!!
Undermining FDR's Legacy is the Target of Reactionary GOP
1932 is the most important election of the 20th Century, when FDR effectively stabilized a collapsing country and started to rise all boats to become the superpower that it is now. In discussion of this election, its important to point out the sore losers of that election and their descendants our modern GOP party that has spent the last fifty years trying to undermine and reverse FDR's legacy.
FDR was America's greatest modern president and his policies created the prosperity of the last fifty years that has made the US the superpower that is is. The list of FDR accomplishments is extensive and undeniably the greatest contributions to the US's success in the 20th Century.
Thank god for FDR institutions like the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the FDIC. FDR inherited a collapsed country from Republican incompetence and restored a populist government to work for the people, thus created mortal enemies of America's wealthy aristocracies and privileged oligarchies.
Unfortunately the GOP has never got over the election of 1932, and now we have an aristocratic GOP presidential candidate who has promised to continue rolling back FDR's reforms, exemplified by his promise to kill Social Security. We are enduring an administration now that has done everything in its power to erode or destroy regulatory agencies, by withholding any regulatory enforcement funding and by installing incompetence political hacks and industry insiders with conflicts of interest.
Folks who grew up in the depression knew who screwed up the economy and voted Democratic religiously. Again we see history repeating itself with Republicans like Bush screwing up our economy, bringing us close to another collapse. Fortunately some of FDR's institutions are still firewalls to some of the GOP incompetence, but the US economy might not survive another round of Republican economic impotency and GOP fiscal irresponsibility.
It is time to dump Bush/McCain if we don't want to see our country's economy and integrity continued to be squandered. We need to dump the current aristocracy with a real regime change, to bring real reforms to recover for the incompetence of the past eight years.
While USN&WR defines FDR as one of five inexperienced presidents, FDR has the competence to make his first 100 days in office after the 1932 election the most important period of reform and stabilization of our country at one of its most dire times. The current Republican presidential candidate offers the experience of Coolidge and Hoover, while our country is desperate for the competence of a Democrat like FDR and Clinton.
advertisement










