Taxpayers and Private Groups Pay for Congress's Globe-trotting Over Memorial Day
One of the benefits of being a member of Congress is lavish trips, sometimes on the taxpayers' dime
Updated on 7/25/08


From May 25 to 31, four House lawmakers journeyed to Oslo and scenic Svalbard, a Norwegian archipelago of pristine arctic wilderness studded with mountains and glaciers, at the expense of sponsors including the nonprofit International Management and Development Institute. Reps. Rick Boucher of Virginia and his wife, Henry Johnson of Georgia and an aide, Mark Souder of Indiana and a son, and Deborah Pryce of Ohio and a sister all took the trip. Topics for the weeklong U.S.-Norwegian Congressional Roundtable included climate change and energy. The tab was $71,358. Johnson, in a statement to U.S. News, called global warming a pre-eminent issue and noted that he saw widespread thawing "occurring much more rapidly than a decade ago." Pryce, who is leaving Congress after this term, had no comment on the trip. "You've seen the disclosure statement? That kind of speaks for itself," says Rob Nichols, her spokesman.
Rep. John Sarbanes of Maryland flew to Athens for three nights for ceremonies honoring his father, former Sen. Paul Sarbanes, and met with Greek officials. The Constantinos Karamanlis Institute for Democracy paid costs of $7,811 for Representative Sarbanes, who spent time with relatives in Greece at his own expense. He noted in a statement to U.S. News that he is Greek-American and belongs to the congressional Hellenic Caucus and added: "Though it packed a lot into a few days, this was a unique opportunity to meet with a range of high-level officials to gain their perspective and insights."
Tougher rules now govern travel after an uproar over disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who ferried a few lawmakers to golf trips at the famed St Andrews Links in Scotland several years ago. Chief among the changes is that lobbyists, or firms that employ them, can't plan anything but the shortest trips. The Senate makes an exception for charities with lobbyists, as does the House for colleges and universities that retain them. Amid the new rules, an irony has emerged. While more sunlight streams into travel paid for by outsiders, like Aspen, there is comparatively less divulged when taxpayers foot the bill.
Two areas generally shielded are the cost of using military planes and that of bringing lawmakers' spouses on military flights. At the Department of Defense, spokesman Lt. Col. Brian Maka was asked for details on the "codels" (congressional delegation travel) for the Memorial Day period, including the Italy and Slovenia trip. He refused. "As a matter of practice, the department does not release the specifics of congressional delegation travel," he says.
At Public Citizen, a watchdog group, Craig Holman applauds the tighter restrictions on travel that took effect in 2007, especially the curbs on the influence of lobbyists. But he laments the limited disclosure made when lawmakers travel on the public dime. "A lot of these trips are educational," he says, but "we don't have a clue what goes on during those trips and how much (actually) is being spent." How many went abroad in late May is unclear, as reports still are trickling in, though current reports show that Democrats took nearly two thirds of the known trips.
The Aspen Congressional Program vastly outpaced other outside groups in footing the bill for congressional travel, spending nearly $5 million since 2000, according to figures compiled by Congressional Quarterly's MoneyLine. Lawmakers praise Aspen, but some acknowledge concern over how outsiders view lavish freebies. "Do I worry about perception? Sure," says one lawmaker who has taken part in Aspen conferences and spoke anonymously to be candid. "There's no question there've been boondoggles in the past...embarrassing abuses of congressional privilege." He once floated the idea that Aspen convene a congressional conference in a national park lodge rather than at a lavish foreign destination but was shot down. One reason is that the Senate rules limit such domestic trips to three days and foreign trips to seven days, not including travel. Another reason is Aspen's first two conferences on Maryland's Eastern Shore "were a disaster," Aspen's Clark says. "People came late, canceled, went back early, were on the phone all the time."
Reader Comments
The Evil of Two Lessers
Thank you for this fine article. Many of these responses indicate people are comprehending what is really happening inside the Beltway. Whether this is a mountain or molehill isn't the point. It is only a snapshot of the excess and abuse occurring everday at the taxpayers' expense. The whole portfolio is tantamount to a nightmare!
As for those who don't have a problem with this, perhaps voting for the lesser of two evils is your preference? My suggestion is don't deride those who think outside the box and vote for third party candidates. It is imperative to recognize all the problems in our government and NOT be dismissive of them. Voters should NOT accept the evil of two lessers and validate the type of corruption outlined in this article.
Indeed, term limits are essential. Here's a plan: 2 terms for Senators and 6 terms for Representatives. A dozen years is ample time to productively serve the public.
Meanwhile, saavy journalists and readers shall continue to lead you to the water in hopes that someday you'll drink it. Otherwise, enjoy the steady diet of coolaide the two major parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, are feeding you, the voting taxpayer, while they enjoy the finest wines in Rome, etc.
Net worth of Congressmen
If you want to see what the net worth of our poorly paid congressmen/women is go to http://www.sunlightfoundation.com and click on icon that reads "Fortune 535, Running the numbers on Congressional New Worth." You can look up net worth of congressment/women by state, individual, richest or poorest. In many ways these individuals are the best money can buy.
No problem with this, seconded
This article is bemoaning molehills while ignoring the MOUNTAINS of corporate excess in the private sector rob shareholders and customers to line their deep pockets. Remember Dennis Koslowski, Ken Lay, Al Dunlap, Michael Eisner, Michael Ovitz? They are only the ones who got caught, either by the law or the media spotlight - tip of the iceberg. And then a $20K junket to Rome is dwarfed by the multibillion dollar unnecessary wars the Bush family is so eager to engage our armed forces in. There are far more important issues to be addressed than who got what junket and whose wife got to come along for the ride...
If we are to attract talent into federal government, there needs to be some sort of reward, like lavish business trips. Right now, the pay is too small for many of the executive and legislative positions. This results in rather untalented people, like George W Bush, running for president nowadays. That position in particular needs a pay raise. The head of state in tiny Singapore makes a million a year. We should copy that to lure more talented people into running for office.
advertisement









